- Joined
- Aug 30, 2013
- Messages
- 904
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Church is primarily for the saved period, no matter which service. The AM service has certainly been used for evangelism, and I am ok with that, but church is for the saved.QuestioningIFB said:A lot of seeker-sensitive Southern Baptist churches in my town are no longer calling themselves Baptist even though they still completely are at a doctrinal level. The church leadership will many times say that Baptist turns away non-believers who need to hear the Gospel because of the stigma associated with it. It comes down to your belief on the role of the church to begin with.
Do you take the approach that the Sunday morning church service should primarily be aimed at bringing in the unsaved to hear the Gospel? Or is it primarily for the saved and therefore the church likely has a soul winning ministry in which they go out door to door sharing the Gospel. If the church's mission is to bring in the world to proclaim the Gospel to them, then if something simple like a church name is a stumbling block to bringing them in, it would be right to drop it. If its primarily for the saved, then absolutely not because denominations will really help people narrow down the search to find a church that believes similar to how they do. Though even today there is a wide range of beliefs within the Baptist church, when a church calls itself Baptist for the most part you know where they stand on the fundamentals of the faith.
The gospel is to be taken to people, not people to the gospel. That doesnt mean you shouldn't preach the gospel at church or that people won't get saved at church, but the local church is a called out assembly of baptized believers and they gather for edification.