Another option:I do find it interesting that the different responses have a similar thought pattern. First express doubt that it happened at all then say something to the effect that even if it did happen he basically deserved it because he should have known better. The net conclusion is that the people reacted in a perfectly reasonable manner.
I'm not saying it didn't happen; I'm saying the narrative doesn't make sense. It's vague. It lacks context. It's constructed so that the reader is emotionally sucked in into one side then used to decry the politicizing of a congregation as though this is a perfect example of what's happening everywhere.