Biblical Discipline:Things That Make You Go "What The .....?"

[BALAAM]

Ok who is it?

James I of England, clearly. However, he was just as much a queen as he was a king.

Like RevBlob?

 

[RevBob]

Here are some pics of a person from a child to an older person. Nice dresses and hosiery.

OK, they are pics of paintings not original photographs.

Man or woman you decide.

Who is this person?

Does it matter?  Again, are we to follow the Christian Bible completely and unconditionally, or are we to imitate people?

 

[Bruh]

Here are some pics of a person from a child to an older person. Nice dresses and hosiery.

OK, they are pics of paintings not original photographs.

Man or woman you decide.

Who is this person?

Does it matter?  Again, are we to follow the Christian Bible completely and unconditionally, or are we to imitate people?

Follow me as I follow Christ.

 

[Recovering IFB]

Does it matter?  Again, are we to follow the Christian Bible completely and unconditionally, or are we to imitate people?

you still haven't given us a definition of long hair yet. Can you please tell us what that particular length is?

 

[T-Bone]

Does it matter?  Again, are we to follow the Christian Bible completely and unconditionally, or are we to imitate people?

you still haven't given us a definition of long hair yet. Can you please tell us what that particular length is?

He is the normal ignorant KJVO nut...he either can't or won't answer questions from his inane statements..you know like his challenge to have someon provide a scripture that speaks of women being priests before God...here it is....



1 Peter 2:9-10King James Version (KJV)

9 But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light;

10 Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy.

King James Version (KJV)
by Public Domain

He remains silent...these nuts are all the same!

 

[bgwilkinson]

Here are some pics of a person from a child to an older person. Nice dresses and hosiery.

OK, they are pics of paintings not original photographs.

Man or woman you decide.

Who is this person?

Does it matter?  Again, are we to follow the Christian Bible completely and unconditionally, or are we to imitate people?

The person in the pics was the supreme monarch of England in the early 17th century.

He was the head of the Church of England.

If he was alive today he would be an LGBT hero.

He made critical translation decisions himself, not based on valid linguistic scholarship, but rather based on expedience, what would be the best translation to support his weak monarchy and his control of the people through the state church of which he was in absolute control.

Examples are church, baptism, Easter, etc. The ecclesiastical words that supported the state church not the honest translations that should have been made. The ones made by Tyndale for example.

Now if the man that was in control of the translation does not wear his hair as it says in his book how can we expect anyone else to obey the book rather than the personal example of King James?

If only effeminate James would obey the book and look more like this. Everything would be all right in my fathers house.

 

[RevBob]

1 Peter 2:9-10King James Version (KJV)

9 But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light;

10 Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy.

King James Version (KJV)
by Public Domain

He remains silent...these nuts are all the same!

So your claim is that these verses tell women to be priests?  Please do tell us how they can be priests while being commanded to be silent within churches and directed to not teach any men (instead receiving instruction from their pastors and husbands).

 

[RevBob]

The person in the pics was the supreme monarch of England in the early 17th century.

He was the head of the Church of England.

If he was alive today he would be an LGBT hero.

He made critical translation decisions himself, not based on valid linguistic scholarship, but rather based on expedience, what would be the best translation to support his weak monarchy and his control of the people through the state church of which he was in absolute control.

Examples are church, baptism, Easter, etc. The ecclesiastical words that supported the state church not the honest translations that should have been made. The ones made by Tyndale for example.

Now if the man that was in control of the translation does not wear his hair as it says in his book how can we expect anyone else to obey the book rather than the personal example of King James?

If only effeminate James would obey the book and look more like this. Everything would be all right in my fathers house.

Ya know, maybe your Cathlic bible doesn't say anything about spreading falsehoods and rumors, but my Christian Bible surely does!

https://www.chick.com/reading/books/158/158_03.asp

Here're some of King James' opinions on marriage and sodomy, from his book Basillikon Doron:

“But the principal blessing [is] in your marrying of a godly and virtuous wife … being flesh of your flesh and bone of your bone. … Marriage is the greatest earthly felicity” (p. 43).

“Keep your body clean and unpolluted while you give it to your wife whom to only it belongs for how can you justly crave to be joined with a Virgin if your body be polluted?” (p. 44).

“When you are married, keep inviolably your promise made to God in your marriage” (p. 45).

“Abstain from the filthy vice of adultery; remember only what solemn promise ye made to God at your marriage” (p. 54).

The king wrote plainly against the sin of homosexuality.

“Especially eschew to be effeminate” (Basilikon Doron, p. 46).

“There are some horrible crimes that ye are bound in conscience never to forgive: such as witchcraft, willful murder, incest, and sodomy” (p. 48).

 

[bgwilkinson]

The person in the pics was the supreme monarch of England in the early 17th century.

He was the head of the Church of England.

If he was alive today he would be an LGBT hero.

He made critical translation decisions himself, not based on valid linguistic scholarship, but rather based on expedience, what would be the best translation to support his weak monarchy and his control of the people through the state church of which he was in absolute control.

Examples are church, baptism, Easter, etc. The ecclesiastical words that supported the state church not the honest translations that should have been made. The ones made by Tyndale for example.

Now if the man that was in control of the translation does not wear his hair as it says in his book how can we expect anyone else to obey the book rather than the personal example of King James?

If only effeminate James would obey the book and look more like this. Everything would be all right in my fathers house.

Ya know, maybe your Cathlic bible doesn't say anything about spreading falsehoods and rumors, but my Christian Bible surely does!

https://www.chick.com/reading/books/158/158_03.asp

Here're some of King James' opinions on marriage and sodomy, from his book Basillikon Doron:

“But the principal blessing [is] in your marrying of a godly and virtuous wife … being flesh of your flesh and bone of your bone. … Marriage is the greatest earthly felicity” (p. 43).

“Keep your body clean and unpolluted while you give it to your wife whom to only it belongs for how can you justly crave to be joined with a Virgin if your body be polluted?” (p. 44).

“When you are married, keep inviolably your promise made to God in your marriage” (p. 45).

“Abstain from the filthy vice of adultery; remember only what solemn promise ye made to God at your marriage” (p. 54).

The king wrote plainly against the sin of homosexuality.

“Especially eschew to be effeminate” (Basilikon Doron, p. 46).

“There are some horrible crimes that ye are bound in conscience never to forgive: such as witchcraft, willful murder, incest, and sodomy” (p. 48).

The issue is his effeminate clothes and particularly his long shaggy hair.

We are not discussing his writing except for his ordered translations.

 

[T-Bone]

1 Peter 2:9-10King James Version (KJV)

9 But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light;

10 Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy.

King James Version (KJV)
by Public Domain

He remains silent...these nuts are all the same!

So your claim is that these verses tell women to be priests?  Please do tell us how they can be priests while being commanded to be silent within churches and directed to not teach any men (instead receiving instruction from their pastors and husbands).

Do you have the ability to comprehend the KJV Bible you worship? If so your argument is not with me, but with Peter and the Holy Spirit who inspired him.  Those in the church  are a royal priesthood ...who's in the church, both male & female believers....surely even you can understand this...but then again probably not.

 

[BALAAM]

1 Peter 2:9-10King James Version (KJV)

9 But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light;

10 Which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy.

King James Version (KJV)
by Public Domain

He remains silent...these nuts are all the same!

So your claim is that these verses tell women to be priests?  Please do tell us how they can be priests while being commanded to be silent within churches and directed to not teach any men (instead receiving instruction from their pastors and husbands).

Wow! You are more clueless than I had originally thought! And that's not easy.

 

[RevBob]

Do you have the ability to comprehend the KJV Bible you worship? If so your argument is not with me, but with Peter and the Holy Spirit who inspired him.  Those in the church  are a royal priesthood ...who's in the church, both male & female believers....surely even you can understand this...but then again probably not.

I don't worship the Christian Bible, I follow it.  Try again, cretin.

 

[RevBob]

The issue is his effeminate clothes and particularly his long shaggy hair.

We are not discussing his writing except for his ordered translations.

I get that you're just trying to be stupid with these "cute" little remarks of yours, but I'll remind you, nevertheless, that I addressed these already: he must have not been corrected in his errors.  And even if he was purposefully in error, it makes none of the difference.  We follow the Christian Bible, not King James. 

And, btw, I see nothing effeminate about his clothes.  He wears pants, like a normal man.  The women of his time wore dresses, like normal women. 

 

[bgwilkinson]

The blind can not see.
The willfully ignorant can not understand.

 

[RevBob]

The blind can not see.
The willfully ignorant can not understand.

To quote Reverend Pastor Cal Smith, Jesus hates you, but it doesn't have to be this way!

I urge you to repent of your evil unbelief, accept the true Jesus of the Christian Bible, and be Saved by His Grace!  Or you will burn in Hell.  The choice is yours to either put away these childish things (1 Cor 13:11), or to continue on your road to eternal damnation.

 

[BALAAM]

The Bible says to admonish a heretic and if he won't listen to reject him. You revblob are a heretic.

 

[Ransom]

The Bible says to admonish a heretic and if he won't listen to reject him. You revblob are a heretic.

RevPoe would have to be a Christian of some kind before he was a heretic. I think he's just a run-of-the-mill unbeliever: probably some bargain-basement, teenage atheist dilettante doing a poor imitation of a fundy preacher to impress his teen buddies at www.athiests-r-4w3sum.com.

 

[RevBob]

The Bible says to admonish a heretic and if he won't listen to reject him. You revblob are a heretic.

Correct, the Christian Bible does tell us to admonish heretics.  Therefore I admonish you, yet again.  I urge to reject your satanic racism and homosexuality, repent of your sins, and accept the true Jesus of the Christian Bible and His gift of Salvation.

 

[subllibrm]

Sorry to disappoint YOU--I'm a real man, happily married to a good Christian woman!  I have no interest in your homofaggotry!

And only  occasional child making.

 

[T-Bone]

Do you have the ability to comprehend the KJV Bible you worship? If so your argument is not with me, but with Peter and the Holy Spirit who inspired him.  Those in the church  are a royal priesthood ...who's in the church, both male & female believers....surely even you can understand this...but then again probably not.

I don't worship the Christian Bible, I follow it.  Try again, cretin.

Wow...I bet you looked that word up! Pretty impressive for a troll...though you seem to be losing your cool. ?