Yeah. That what they say about Calvinism AND Arianism.Is not.
By your own logic, you are refuted.
Bye.
Ha!
Yeah. That what they say about Calvinism AND Arianism.Is not.
By your own logic, you are refuted.
Bye.
Could we have your definition of heresy? And after defining it could you explain how monergism fits the definition?(So glad I ignored that woman)
Monergism is heresy. Your FIRST attack was based on that heresy according to your own words.
And then from that post to this, you pretend to have claimed the high ground.
Pftt!
Prov 26:5 back atcha.Prov. 26:4
Just a quick question here:And yet this thread was meant to discuss the harmony of two opinions.
But certain fellows of the baser sort chose discord instead.
![]()
Do what thou wilt.Prov. 26:4
I take it you have abandoned your argument in the original post, whatever it was supposed to be. Shall I lock the thread, since it serves no further purpose?
Answer:Just a quick question here:
Does God decree all things that come to pass? Why or why not?
Twisting like a snake: same as Calvin the heretic burner.If someone simultaneously declares many of a forum's members to be heretics, and gets hurt that "certain fellows of the baser sort chose discord instead," he is the very model of a double-minded man.
You gotta laugh.
Does God allow sin and rebellion to exist? Do you think he is powerless to stop it? If not, why doesn't he?Answer:
If God has decreed all things including sin and rebellion, how is that any different than fatslism?
Allowed and decreed are two very different things.Does God allow sin and rebellion to exist? Do you think he is powerless to stop it? If not, why doesn't he?
indeed... ... like calling someone a "looney leftist"..... a label he has tagged both meJim, you continue to throw out the term heretic and heresy. Are you at least going to do the intellectually honest thing and define the term? Otherwise it appears you are just engaging in ad hominem arguments equivalent to “you’re just a great big poopy head”.

Yep, name calling just exposes the weakness of the argument, and the one arguing.indeed... ... like calling someone a "looney leftist"..... a label he has tagged both me
and ransom with so far.. .... and for little more than disagreeing with him, it seems....
. ... ..in another thread he labelled me a racist.... then changed it to "ray cyst" before
offering a vile description to match his non-clever spelling... ....
a misuse of the label 'heretic"... applied where it doesn;t belong... could just as easily
be confused with "hairy tick"... ..i don;t have a description of a "hairy tick".. but i did
find a picture i made years ago of what i imagined one could look like......
View attachment 9068
ixodidas hirsutious.... ....aka.... hairy tick...
(my somewhat scientific contribution to the discussion.... i didn;t reply directly to
jim knox with this as apparently he has me on ignore.... so it would have been futile
to do so....... ...and....i must add...i offer sincerest apologies to any real scientist
in attendance who might be offended by my misuse of binomial nomenclature)![]()
That's what I am thankful for most here. No one has called me names in response to my posts.Yep, name calling just exposes the weakness of the argument, and the one arguing.
i know..... and you haven;t accused us of anything either... nor implied we sold our souls ...or had evil motives for voting republican... .That's what I am thankful for most here. No one has called me names in response to my posts.![]()
Heresy:Jim, you continue to throw out the term heretic and heresy. Are you at least going to do the intellectually honest thing and define the term? Otherwise it appears you are just engaging in ad hominem arguments equivalent to “you’re just a great big poopy head”.