Sounds like he’s a Grade-A nut: https://www.sltrib.com/news/2025/09/10/george-zinn-what-we-know-about-man/The guy they got in custody for questioning is George Zinn. He's pretty well known in Utah as a "politcal gadfly".
Sounds like he’s a Grade-A nut: https://www.sltrib.com/news/2025/09/10/george-zinn-what-we-know-about-man/The guy they got in custody for questioning is George Zinn. He's pretty well known in Utah as a "politcal gadfly".
Yes Kirk was usually reserved and respectful in his discourse…yet t they still murdered him. Which goes to the point that hatred and vitriol run deep.I enjoyed his interactions with people of other opinions. He was very gracious and respectful. I found him to be a breath of fresh air in comparison to the normal right wing bluster and blather. Mocking and belittling was far beneath him. While I have no way to prove it, I highly doubt that the words "black tranny" ever came out of his mouth.
On both sides.Yes Kirk was usually reserved and respectful in his discourse…yet t they still murdered him. Which goes to the point that hatred and vitriol run deep.
I actually only recently found out he was an evangelical Christian when he had a friendly religious debate with Michael Knowles of the Daily Wire. Michael Knowles is a Catholic.
One of my favorite former coworker is Catholic and the spiritual conversations we had were a wonderful experience. Take the doctrinal debates out and what was left was a pair of guys working out their salvation.J. D. Vance tweeted something similar. They became friends some time ago, and he particularly remarked how much he enjoyed their religious discussions/debates (Vance also being Catholic).
On both sides.
One of my favorite former coworker is Catholic and the spiritual conversations we had were a wonderful experience. Take the doctrinal debates out and what was left was a pair of guys working out their salvation.
None of which excuses the "hate and vitriol" that I was addressing.Maybe, but one side in particular is disproportionately over-represented when it comes to political violence and assassination.
Maybe John Wilkes Booth could be considerled right-wing, being pro-slavery and pro-Confederacy. The (would-be) assassins of Garfield and Reagan were loons, and perhaps acting for personal rather than political reasons. And I think we still don't know enough about Trump's shooter to ascribe a specific political motive. Other than that, from McKinley on up, I can only think of progressives and political radicals.
Your moral equivalency argument aside, the left, by their “Trump is a racist and fascist and will end Democracy and have no further elections etc” arguments give loons a reason to be extreme.None of which excuses the "hate and vitriol" that I was addressing.
BTW the right has her fair share of political radicals.
"A surgically and chemically emasculated, feminized brute with a high concentration of epidermal melanin." Feel better?I highly doubt that the words "black tranny" ever came out of his mouth.
Do you?"A surgically and chemically emasculated, feminized brute with a high concentration of epidermal melanin." Feel better?
BTW the right has her fair share of political radicals.