- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Messages
- 8,854
- Reaction score
- 843
- Points
- 113
https://mariomurilloministries.wordpress.com/2018/06/08/christians-who-hate-trump/
Christians who hate Trump.
- Thread starter Tarheel Baptist
- Start date
- Joined
- May 13, 2014
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I don't hate our President, I'm disappointed in the American people.
When I was a kid, I was told that character matters.
I watched as Bill Clinton was HAMMERED (and rightfully so) for his lies. Now the same people turn a blind eye as we see provable lies almost daily.
I watched as Christians called President Obama the anti-Christ and a secret Muslim and said he was not an American citizen, but now voted for a man who ADMITTEDLY groped women, who talked in interviews about walking into Miss Teen USA pageants dressing rooms (note than many contestants are under age) and who called for people to vote for an accused pedophile over a democrat. THAT SAME MAN calls himself a Christian, but when asked if he's ever asked for forgiveness said no, because he didn't think he needed it.... and Christian leaders called him a Christian.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2r_y4E5zUY and Bible verse 1 John 1:8
I've watched him say that white supremacists are "fine people" and that the Mexicans coming to America are murders and rapists (and SOME, I ASSUME, are good people). I've watched him condemn acts of terrorism, but I can tell the color of the person's skin by whether he says "Thoughts and prayers", or starts yelling about terrorists.
I've watched as he says that every intelligence agency that we have is lying, and that Russia did not hack us, because that's what Putin told him. Total witch hunt that he keeps desperately trying to stop... but that witch hunt has found a lot of witches.
I've watched Fox news do a 180 on numerous topics, such as talking to the North Korean dictator (When Obama did it, it was the end of the world, but when Trump does it, it's Nobel Prize worthy.
By the way, Fox News is the LARGEST news network in the country, and they seem to adore him, so I wouldn't say that 98% of the media is against him... especially when you factor in Sinclair broadcasting.
He HAS said that he wants to change the constitution, but not in so many words. He wants to remove libel laws, has said that we should take guns away from people without a trial, he thinks that people should be declared guilty by ICE without a trial (sounds like Judge Dredd)
He IS a businessman, but to be fair, he's avoid paying a lot of his contractors, gone bankrupt so many times, started a school that basically ripped of the students, and used his wealth to put an ad in the paper calling for the death penalty for the Central Park 5 (Who were eventually found not guilty, and who President Trump recently said should be in jail anyway).
The article mentions a number of things that he HAS done. God doesn't need Trump for those things. It could have been anyone. Just because Christians got what they wanted, doesn't mean that he's the right man. It just means that God provided. I also find it odd that at the end, he says we should support the president and vote... more people voted for his opponent than him. It also appears that Russia meddled in the election, but he refuses to admit it and the government isn't doing anything to stop it from happening again.
Let's ask ourselves. If democrats did these things, would we still be singing their praises? If not, then it's just partisanship over country.
When I was a kid, I was told that character matters.
I watched as Bill Clinton was HAMMERED (and rightfully so) for his lies. Now the same people turn a blind eye as we see provable lies almost daily.
I watched as Christians called President Obama the anti-Christ and a secret Muslim and said he was not an American citizen, but now voted for a man who ADMITTEDLY groped women, who talked in interviews about walking into Miss Teen USA pageants dressing rooms (note than many contestants are under age) and who called for people to vote for an accused pedophile over a democrat. THAT SAME MAN calls himself a Christian, but when asked if he's ever asked for forgiveness said no, because he didn't think he needed it.... and Christian leaders called him a Christian.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2r_y4E5zUY and Bible verse 1 John 1:8
I've watched him say that white supremacists are "fine people" and that the Mexicans coming to America are murders and rapists (and SOME, I ASSUME, are good people). I've watched him condemn acts of terrorism, but I can tell the color of the person's skin by whether he says "Thoughts and prayers", or starts yelling about terrorists.
I've watched as he says that every intelligence agency that we have is lying, and that Russia did not hack us, because that's what Putin told him. Total witch hunt that he keeps desperately trying to stop... but that witch hunt has found a lot of witches.
I've watched Fox news do a 180 on numerous topics, such as talking to the North Korean dictator (When Obama did it, it was the end of the world, but when Trump does it, it's Nobel Prize worthy.
By the way, Fox News is the LARGEST news network in the country, and they seem to adore him, so I wouldn't say that 98% of the media is against him... especially when you factor in Sinclair broadcasting.
He HAS said that he wants to change the constitution, but not in so many words. He wants to remove libel laws, has said that we should take guns away from people without a trial, he thinks that people should be declared guilty by ICE without a trial (sounds like Judge Dredd)
He IS a businessman, but to be fair, he's avoid paying a lot of his contractors, gone bankrupt so many times, started a school that basically ripped of the students, and used his wealth to put an ad in the paper calling for the death penalty for the Central Park 5 (Who were eventually found not guilty, and who President Trump recently said should be in jail anyway).
The article mentions a number of things that he HAS done. God doesn't need Trump for those things. It could have been anyone. Just because Christians got what they wanted, doesn't mean that he's the right man. It just means that God provided. I also find it odd that at the end, he says we should support the president and vote... more people voted for his opponent than him. It also appears that Russia meddled in the election, but he refuses to admit it and the government isn't doing anything to stop it from happening again.
Let's ask ourselves. If democrats did these things, would we still be singing their praises? If not, then it's just partisanship over country.
JustVisiting said:
Can you provide some proof, it do you have some inside information that no one else knows about, even the Liberal Cheerleaders? https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/09/politics/north-korea-trump-obama-bush-clinton/index.html
JustVisiting said:
If you read the indictment, this all happened while Obama was president and as his usual practice, did nothing when informed of it. The indictment said there was not vote tampering. Not a single person in the current administration was mentioned. Weird to see you be flippant about the Constitution and the Electorial College, but concerned when it comes to due process and guns... Hypocrite much?
JustVisiting said:
So JustVisiting seems to be just another fool that regurgitates what is fed to them by the news media. While posting "facts" and selective Constitutional support, she fails to see the differences between the Liberal and Conservative presidencies.
Just think about the supreme court choices, and compare the last two and the previous two? Who had the professionally made signs to object to any candidate, the coordinated resistance, the ads hiring protestors?
- Joined
- May 13, 2014
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Yeah, I have inside information. It's recorded from Fox news: https://nowthisnews.com/videos/politics/fox-news-different-reactions-regarding-negotiations-with-north-korea I pay attention. if that's inside information, so be it.
Flippant about the constitution? Please? in what way? I think our voting process security is worth looking into and protecting. The scope of the investigation is to look into Russia meddling in the investigation. What's wrong with that? Now in investigating that, they've come across people who were taking kick backs and lying (or forgetting) about who they were in contact with. Some of those people were eventually charged with lying to the FBI... Interestingly, most of who they forgot they met with were Russians. Now we need to investigate further to make sure that the Russians didn't get farther.
I want Russia held accountable. This week, russian military officers were indicted for hacking the DNC and attempting to hack voting machines.... the President had been notified, but the same morning still called the investigation a witch hunt. He's the one who stood in front of camera and asked Russia to find the emails. They began to work on it THAT DAY. You're right, Obama should have done something more than he did (expelling a few Russians - https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/29/barack-obama-sanctions-russia-election-hack, and seizing their properties before our current president gave them back) according to widespread reporting and Obama aides including vice-president Joe Biden, chief of staff Denis McDonough and senior adviser Ben Rhodes, Obama attempted to formulate a bipartisan statement on Russian election interference in September 2016, two months before the election, but saw the effort ?watered down? by Republican Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell.
Sources for that: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2017/world/national-security/obama-putin-election-hacking/?utm_term=.c46cc7cbea7a
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/23/mitch-mcconnell-russia-obama-joe-biden-359531
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/30/us/politics/obama-reaction-trump-election-benjamin-rhodes.html
But why turn a blind eye to it now?
Paid protestors? Do only dems do that? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/01/20/even-the-firm-that-hired-actors-to-cheer-trumps-campaign-launch-had-to-wait-to-be-paid/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.c64658c85434
It's alright, I understand that you're going to discount my opinion because I used liberal media sources rather than the president's friends at Fox and Brietbart and even Infowars, just note that I voted for= John McCain and Mitt Romney, and Evan McMullin. Do you think Those people would have selected liberal judges? BTW, I'd rather see judges that are in the middle as I personally believe that they are more likely to be able to judge fairly, but that's just my opinion. I don't have sources on that one.
Flippant about the constitution? Please? in what way? I think our voting process security is worth looking into and protecting. The scope of the investigation is to look into Russia meddling in the investigation. What's wrong with that? Now in investigating that, they've come across people who were taking kick backs and lying (or forgetting) about who they were in contact with. Some of those people were eventually charged with lying to the FBI... Interestingly, most of who they forgot they met with were Russians. Now we need to investigate further to make sure that the Russians didn't get farther.
I want Russia held accountable. This week, russian military officers were indicted for hacking the DNC and attempting to hack voting machines.... the President had been notified, but the same morning still called the investigation a witch hunt. He's the one who stood in front of camera and asked Russia to find the emails. They began to work on it THAT DAY. You're right, Obama should have done something more than he did (expelling a few Russians - https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/29/barack-obama-sanctions-russia-election-hack, and seizing their properties before our current president gave them back) according to widespread reporting and Obama aides including vice-president Joe Biden, chief of staff Denis McDonough and senior adviser Ben Rhodes, Obama attempted to formulate a bipartisan statement on Russian election interference in September 2016, two months before the election, but saw the effort ?watered down? by Republican Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell.
Sources for that: https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2017/world/national-security/obama-putin-election-hacking/?utm_term=.c46cc7cbea7a
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/23/mitch-mcconnell-russia-obama-joe-biden-359531
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/30/us/politics/obama-reaction-trump-election-benjamin-rhodes.html
But why turn a blind eye to it now?
Paid protestors? Do only dems do that? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/01/20/even-the-firm-that-hired-actors-to-cheer-trumps-campaign-launch-had-to-wait-to-be-paid/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.c64658c85434
It's alright, I understand that you're going to discount my opinion because I used liberal media sources rather than the president's friends at Fox and Brietbart and even Infowars, just note that I voted for= John McCain and Mitt Romney, and Evan McMullin. Do you think Those people would have selected liberal judges? BTW, I'd rather see judges that are in the middle as I personally believe that they are more likely to be able to judge fairly, but that's just my opinion. I don't have sources on that one.
JustVisiting said:
I hope you find professional help.....
Indeed... Politics is basically a contest where the cow patty that smells the least wins.subllibrm said:
