- Joined
- Sep 11, 2013
- Messages
- 529
- Reaction score
- 304
- Points
- 63
This may sound funny coming from a skeptic but I have some thoughts on these threads about church services and music.
It seems to me that evangelism should be done Monday through Saturday by the christians OUTSIDE OF CHURCH and church should be for the edification of the saints as they assemble themselves together.
With that in mind, the tempo of the music and the style of dress is inimportant AS LONG AS it edifies you and encourages you. For me personally, I can't IMAGINE being encouraged by a Jim Morrison - Mick Jagger type of song. But that's just me. If there truly ARE people of you that are encouraged by that type of music and if, indeed, you are more comfortable in shorts, then hey.
HowEVER, I'd be careful to criticize or mock others that like a more traditional style. Different people have different tastes. If one is more comfortable with "Your are my Sonshine, baby" and another is more comfortable with "Guide me oh thou GREAT JEHOVAH" then it seems like there is a place for both AS LONG AS it helps you to remain focused.
But doesn't the Bible teach that "few" there be and that the road is "narrow"? Doesn't the Bible teach you that you must "take up your cross" in subjection to Christ.?
My point: By it's very nature the true number of saints in any church will be small and church leaders, it seems to me, should strive to make their services scriptural and condusive to the saints, not the mass crowd.
A pastor and his deacons should decide what their church is for:
is it to get as many people as they can so that they can have bigger tithes: then you must do whatever is necessary to get THE CROWDS - make it just as comfortable and entertaining as possible.
OR
is it to edify those FEW who have given up their lives in true subjection to Christ - denying themselves. If so, then it might not be so necessary to resemble "the world". . .
recently I was invited to church. I went (and the roof didn't fall in). This church was of the former type. no choir (no big deal), guitars (no big deal) shorts and sandals as opposed to suits (no big deal), "money changers" in the bookstore and coffee shop and so forth. And people everywhere. One would be tempted to say that "the spirit of the Lord" was in that place because there were so many people.
All those people included the lady that came up to me, praise Jesus, and greeted me . . . with her breasteses jiggling in her halter top.
Christians should stay focused on just WHAT church is for.
It seems to me that evangelism should be done Monday through Saturday by the christians OUTSIDE OF CHURCH and church should be for the edification of the saints as they assemble themselves together.
With that in mind, the tempo of the music and the style of dress is inimportant AS LONG AS it edifies you and encourages you. For me personally, I can't IMAGINE being encouraged by a Jim Morrison - Mick Jagger type of song. But that's just me. If there truly ARE people of you that are encouraged by that type of music and if, indeed, you are more comfortable in shorts, then hey.
HowEVER, I'd be careful to criticize or mock others that like a more traditional style. Different people have different tastes. If one is more comfortable with "Your are my Sonshine, baby" and another is more comfortable with "Guide me oh thou GREAT JEHOVAH" then it seems like there is a place for both AS LONG AS it helps you to remain focused.
But doesn't the Bible teach that "few" there be and that the road is "narrow"? Doesn't the Bible teach you that you must "take up your cross" in subjection to Christ.?
My point: By it's very nature the true number of saints in any church will be small and church leaders, it seems to me, should strive to make their services scriptural and condusive to the saints, not the mass crowd.
A pastor and his deacons should decide what their church is for:
is it to get as many people as they can so that they can have bigger tithes: then you must do whatever is necessary to get THE CROWDS - make it just as comfortable and entertaining as possible.
OR
is it to edify those FEW who have given up their lives in true subjection to Christ - denying themselves. If so, then it might not be so necessary to resemble "the world". . .
recently I was invited to church. I went (and the roof didn't fall in). This church was of the former type. no choir (no big deal), guitars (no big deal) shorts and sandals as opposed to suits (no big deal), "money changers" in the bookstore and coffee shop and so forth. And people everywhere. One would be tempted to say that "the spirit of the Lord" was in that place because there were so many people.
All those people included the lady that came up to me, praise Jesus, and greeted me . . . with her breasteses jiggling in her halter top.
Christians should stay focused on just WHAT church is for.