Democrats have finally agreed on the statue to replace American historic figures

Now it is the fault of police?

BS... 30 year old grandmas told me how they work the system to get more welfare money.

Let's break this down...

Government gives money to mommas to be

Greedy people with no morals gain the money by getting prego

Greed, immorality and theft from the public treasury.
 
Smellin Coffee said:
In other words, the non-religious must take on your (and my) religious conviction concerning monogamy

No, they must take on our religious conviction concerning murder.

Monogamy and chastity are simply the most effective means to that end.
 
Smellin Coffee said:
Abortion makes up only 3% of PP's services.

You can make brownies that only have 3% manure in them but I won't be accepting your offer to enjoy a sweet treat.
 
Smellin Coffee said:
subllibrm said:
And white supremacists make up .00003% of Americans. Which is the bigger problem again?
Please show me where you got that statistic.

There has been a video circulating on FB. It is an interview of a KKK couple by a Latina reporter. As the video plays little "factiods" keep popping up. One of them reads "there are as many as 8000 of them in the country". In generally accepted numbers there are over 300 million people in the US. Using the basic mathematical formula for percentage I divided 8000 by 300 million and got .000026. I rounded the population down and the percentage up to realize the largest possible percentage. Statistical analysis is fun. I suggest that you try it.

BTW more that 8000 people show up to high school football playoff games in our little town. In that context it is a significant number. In the context of national population it is a rounding error.
 
Smellin Coffee said:
subllibrm said:
Smellin Coffee said:
FSSL said:
Smellin Coffee said:
No, living conditions such as poverty, abuse and lack of affordable healthcare.

... a welfare system designed to give unwed mothers more money for each child they birth encouraging promiscuity.

Wait, I though you were FOR babies? So you are willing to let them starve or die of illness because of unaffordable healthcare?

Weird pro-life stance here...

How about people keep their pants on until they are married and able to provide from themselves?

In other words, the non-religious must take on your (and my) religious conviction concerning monogamy in order to prevent poverty and give poor people INCLUDING BABIES healthcare without bankrupting them.

Until they conform to OUR moral code, we just won't care for them.

Again, how is that being pro-life?

You are obliging me to be morally responsible for the consequences of their actions but deny me the right to speak of the immorality that led to those consequences?
 
Smellin Coffee said:
So when you have daddies and mommies in jail for crimes they didn't commit, having to confess to crimes they didn't commit or continue in jail (research the Kalief Browden story) because of their poverty and refusal to admit guilt when they were innocent, its no wonder the family unit of the poor gets torn apart. Guess what happens? Promiscuity. Not condoning it, just saying...

That might be the dumbest example of rationalization I have ever read. Let me paraphrase it for you:

"I got arrested for a crime I didn't commit. I guess I will go diddle my girlfriend."
 
Dennis Prager sums up the whole issue quite nicely in this clip.  The "Left" does not fight real evil only statues.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umYuP-291d0
 
Back
Top