Dems abandoning their hero to win in the midterms
- Thread starter FSSL
- Start date
FSSL said:
Really....Trump's lawyer sent the money, not Trump. I honestly can't believe you would float that as an excuse.
Politically-motivated faux moralism-Republicans believing Clinton was rightfully impeached and should have been removed from office but voted for Donald Trump and to continue to defend him.
Bill Clinton was immoral. No question about it. The Democratic Party never claimed to be the party of the Moral Majority, Religious Right or the home of Evangelicals.
Roy Moore lost the election...so how would either be news at at point?
FSSL said:
Of course you get but Trump. Bill Clinton hasn't been President for 18 years and Trump is in the White House today. You can't fix what happen 2 decades ago but you can impact what is happening today.
Dems are not about fixing their sexual abuses.
They are all about digging into their opponents? past with no regard as to the changes they have made. As a Democrat, Trump did as Democrats do!
If Trump were to commit such abuses today, he would lose his support.
Clintons have not lost their support from the Dems. They just need to keep Bill quiet until after the mid-terms.
They are all about digging into their opponents? past with no regard as to the changes they have made. As a Democrat, Trump did as Democrats do!
If Trump were to commit such abuses today, he would lose his support.
Clintons have not lost their support from the Dems. They just need to keep Bill quiet until after the mid-terms.
FSSL said:
The Democrats like the Republicans have looked the other way in the past but they Democrats took Al Franken to take a hike quickly.
I really doubt Trump would lose what support. The $130,000 was paid by Trump's lawyer just prior to the election and no one is batting an eye.
Clintons are done in the Democratic party. Admittedly not because of immorality but their day is done. Hillary cost the Democrats an election that should have been won. People will smile nicely at them but the influence they have had in largely negated.
Clintons are done? Bahhh! Two words: ?Clinton Foundation ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LongGone said:
Above, you said anyone who believed this was absurd to ?float that as an excuse.? Looks like you have caught up on your homework .
No one cares because it is not an admission of guilt. It is a lawyer dealing with a woman making an accusation, in a lawyer-styled fashion.
FSSL said:
Fine....$130,000 is an expensive way to make sue something doesn't come out just before an election. You pay generally because you have something to hide. No one cares because it is just one more woman to add to the 19 that came forward and the Billy Bush bus conversation.
LongGone said:
Or... because defending yourself against accusers would require a lot more dough. I don't know what happened. Neither do you. So... here we are again... accusations.
Remember, Trump was a Democrat at the time. Is it all true? Maybe. Maybe not. The Billy Bush bus conversation is just the way Dems talk. They wear their vagina hats and get all riled up over his use of the word "p_ _ _ y."
Clinton's escapades have been verified as true.
FSSL said:
19 accusers plus Stormy and Karen McDougal. Trump includes porn stars, hush money, caught on tape crudeness and tawdry tabloids. It has been said Bill Clinton would blush at how easily Trump seems to duck consequences for it all.
To say the Billy Bush bus conversation is just the way Dems talk is really a stretch even for you.
What is verified is that both Clinton and Trump are immoral. What is also true is Evangelicals had nothing to do with the election of Clinton.
Well, here we are at the proverbial FFF tennis match.
Evangelicals were uneasy voting for Trump... they had no real alternative.
So far, he seems to be morally responsible and putting conservative, constitutionally-minded judges throughout the judicial system.
For that reason, many evangelicals are very supportive.
Evangelicals were uneasy voting for Trump... they had no real alternative.
So far, he seems to be morally responsible and putting conservative, constitutionally-minded judges throughout the judicial system.
For that reason, many evangelicals are very supportive.
FSSL said:
What you said is fair enough. What tends to look hypocritical is statements like "All these things were years ago" from Falwell Jr and Tony Perkins stating he and others are willing to give the president a "mulligan" on issues of personal morality because he champions an evangelical agenda.
Evangelicals have cried loudly about character in public leadership over the years.