We are on the 4th (?) permutation of the FFF. How would some of you old-timers describe the differences?
ALAYMAN said:The original incarnation (which I barely missed) was apparently just a Jack Hyles lampoon-fest. The second iteration was a wild slug-fest of folks fighting out similar issues that you hear about on this one, but the depth of it was much richer (Phil Johnson, Edwards, etc). The third form of it (FFF.net) became a slimepit, and Barry (our illustrious OP starter) brought us this jewel, which is shallow as the Kardashians.
Tim said:praise_yeshua said:All the forums have been freewheeling. Andrew was a pain. He was far too selective in how he governed. Which is pretty much evident in his primary focus on his "other" forum.
Quality is all about the posters. Some are gone. Some don't participate and others were never as good as they thought they were.....
Overall. I agree with Ransom. Social media has pretty much left the "forum" behind. Its not entirely left behind. Just suffering a little. There is some much information to capture the mind anymore........
That and the fundies have pretty much self destructed. Lies pretty much live for a lifetime...... in this digital age.
From what I see on Facebook - lots of folks self-publishing their brand of ideology with more control. My guess is that the forum was their platform in the past and they have moved on ...
praise_yeshua said:Tim said:praise_yeshua said:All the forums have been freewheeling. Andrew was a pain. He was far too selective in how he governed. Which is pretty much evident in his primary focus on his "other" forum.
Quality is all about the posters. Some are gone. Some don't participate and others were never as good as they thought they were.....
Overall. I agree with Ransom. Social media has pretty much left the "forum" behind. Its not entirely left behind. Just suffering a little. There is some much information to capture the mind anymore........
That and the fundies have pretty much self destructed. Lies pretty much live for a lifetime...... in this digital age.
From what I see on Facebook - lots of folks self-publishing their brand of ideology with more control. My guess is that the forum was their platform in the past and they have moved on ...
They have more control over such content. They can endless edit what they write and even be selective in who sees what they say. You don't get that level of control in this environment. Which is one of the reasons I like this environment much better. Others don't. There is a reason they don't....
Ransom said:The first iteration was freewheeling. It had minimal rules and minimal moderation - just enough to keep things generally civil, if heated. Lots of traffic, and lots of good theological discussions thanks to a number of thoughtful posters (e.g. Phil Johnson, Edwards, Coyote, CorpseNoMore, and others) who brought a counterpoint to some of the extremes of the psycho-fundies and Jack Hyles worshippers.
The second iteration happened when Don finally rebooted the forum on phpBB instead of the obsolete Miva platform it had been on. The character of the forum was pretty much the same, until Katrina happened, and with Don trying to rebuild his destroyed church and town, the trolls and spammers moved in and it became anarchic. Finally Don shut it down.
The third iteration, Andrew's, was somewhat tamer since he moderated a bit more strictly. Unfortunately, when he sold it to owners that couldn't care less about it, it turned into a haven for link spam, I Am Am Angel's spew, and so forth.
This iteration is much like the first apart from the updated software, only a little tamer, perhaps. Not as many weirdos and psycho-fundies around anymore. I don't know what to blame for that. Perhaps with the demise of Hyles and the subsequent decline of FBCH in influence, there aren't as many around. Traffic is considerably lower, too, but I figure social media is responsible for that. Still lots of people around, but they're spending more of their time in other places, too. That's probably true of forums of this kind, overall.
Ransom said:........... Lots of traffic, and lots of good theological discussions thanks to a number of thoughtful posters.....
Bob H said:I thought about adding that also. "Friends" and "enemies" were a "tad bit" smarter back then.
Jim Jones said:Don deserves all the credit.
praise_yeshua said:All the forums have been freewheeling. Andrew was a pain. He was far too selective in how he governed. Which is pretty much evident in his primary focus on his "other" forum.
Quality is all about the posters. Some are gone. Some don't participate and others were never as good as they thought they were.....
Overall. I agree with Ransom. Social media has pretty much left the "forum" behind. Its not entirely left behind. Just suffering a little. There is so much information to capture the mind anymore........
That..... and the fundies have pretty much self destructed. Lies pretty much live for a lifetime...... in this digital age.
Ya reckon it could be a guitar-wielding charismaniac from the olden days? Or perhaps one of his relatives?Bob H said:Jim Jones said:Don deserves all the credit.
We'll figure out who you were. Ya might as well fess up
PappaBear said:Ya reckon it could be a guitar-wielding charismaniac from the olden days? Or perhaps one of his relatives?Bob H said:Jim Jones said:Don deserves all the credit.
We'll figure out who you were. Ya might as well fess up
PappaBear said:]
Ya reckon it could be a guitar-wielding charismaniac from the olden days? Or perhaps one of his relatives?
Web said:I thought that was Escapee.