Fake Media Stories

[qwerty]

Quoting Shaun King..... You are a hilarious snowflake.

Speaking of fake news, is he still pretending to be black?

He is the Martin Luther King of our generation....






We're screwed.

 

[biscuit1953]

Michael Brown was the biggest Fake News Story that millions of people still believe.

And Walter Scott, according to our justice system, wasn't murdered either:

Black racists are just as offensive as White racists.  One racist White juror is just as obscene as a jury full of Black racist jurors.  You are a vile, disgusting race baiter.

 

[Smellin Coffee]

Quoting Shaun King..... You are a hilarious snowflake.

Speaking of fake news, is he still pretending to be black?

Huh? He claims to be biracial, identifying with black culture.

Source

 

[Smellin Coffee]

Black racists are just as offensive as White racists.  One racist White juror is just as obscene as a jury full of Black racist jurors.  You are a vile, disgusting race baiter.

According to some on this forum, cops who are not arrested or proven innocent in a court of law for shooting an unarmed black man means they didn't do the crime. I've even used OJ as proof that lack of arrest or conviction does not necessarily mean complete innocence.

If speaking out against cops who shoot unarmed individuals when there are alternative means to keep him alive makes me a race-baiter, so be it.

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

Black racists are just as offensive as White racists.  One racist White juror is just as obscene as a jury full of Black racist jurors.  You are a vile, disgusting race baiter.

According to some on this forum, cops who are not arrested or proven innocent in a court of law for shooting an unarmed black man means they didn't do the crime. I've even used OJ as proof that lack of arrest or conviction does not necessarily mean complete innocence.

If speaking out against cops who shoot unarmed individuals when there are alternative means to keep him alive makes me a race-baiter, so be it.

So let it be....but remember that Jessie and Al won't let you have much of the spotlight. 

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

Quoting Shaun King..... You are a hilarious snowflake.

Speaking of fake news, is he still pretending to be black?

He joined the Rachel Dolezal fan club!

 

[Ransom]

Huh? He claims to be biracial, identifying with black culture.

He only started to claim that after people learned that the parents listed on his birth certificate were both white.

 

[qwerty]

Huh? He claims to be biracial, identifying with black culture.

He only started to claim that after people learned that the parents listed on his birth certificate were both white.

So he lied to create a false narrative ?

Remember that time MLK did that?

I am sure Shaun's mom would appreciate her son saying that she was a whore and slept around so he could be"relevant". No one is sacred in the liberal ideology. 

 

[HeDied4U]

 

[Smellin Coffee]

Huh? He claims to be biracial, identifying with black culture.

He only started to claim that after people learned that the parents listed on his birth certificate were both white.

Yeah. In middle school...

When I was 8 years old and in the second grade, black children first began asking me if I was ?mixed.? In our house, my white mother, the sweetest woman ever and one of the best friends I?ve ever had, didn?t talk much about race. Most white families don?t. It?s part of the privilege. I didn?t even know what ?mixed? was. This isn?t a secret. I?ve told this story publicly in front of thousands of people.

After that day when I was first asked if I was mixed, while I was still a very young child, kids and their well-intentioned parents began telling me they knew who my black father was, that I was so and so?s cousin, etc. This was in small-town Versailles, Kentucky, in the 1980s. It happened regularly for years on end. While I didn?t have an understanding of the national dialogue on interracial children, I knew even as a young child that what people were telling meant something very peculiar and unflattering about my mother. I was aware at how different I looked than my siblings, but didn?t understand DNA or genealogy. They were my family and I loved them.

I adored my mother so much then, that I just didn?t have the nerve to ever bring these things up to her. I was a child and loved our care-free relationship. She had been married and divorced several times and by the time I was in second grade she was raising my brother and me as a single mom. By the time I reached middle school, I fully identified myself not even as biracial, but just as black. A white classmate of mine from middle school just posted her recollection of this. Of course, that was an oversimplification of my story, but that was what made sense at that time. Adults who loved and knew me, on many occasions sat me down and told me that I was black. As you could imagine, this had a profound impact on me and soon became my truth.

Every friend I had was black, my girlfriends were black, I was seen as black, treated as black, and endured constant overt racism as a young black teenager. Never have I once identified myself as white. Not on forms, not for convenience or privilege, and not for fun and games, have I ever identified myself as white. I was never a white guy pretending to be black. Not once, ever, did it occur to me that I was being phony or fraudulent or fake. Quite the opposite?I always believed I was living the truest form of my self.

Race, love, hate, and me: A distinctly American story

 

[qwerty]

Huh? He claims to be biracial, identifying with black culture.

He only started to claim that after people learned that the parents listed on his birth certificate were both white.

Yeah. In middle school...

When I was 8 years old and in the second grade, black children first began asking me if I was ?mixed.? In our house, my white mother, the sweetest woman ever and one of the best friends I?ve ever had, didn?t talk much about race. Most white families don?t. It?s part of the privilege. I didn?t even know what ?mixed? was. This isn?t a secret. I?ve told this story publicly in front of thousands of people.

After that day when I was first asked if I was mixed, while I was still a very young child, kids and their well-intentioned parents began telling me they knew who my black father was, that I was so and so?s cousin, etc. This was in small-town Versailles, Kentucky, in the 1980s. It happened regularly for years on end. While I didn?t have an understanding of the national dialogue on interracial children, I knew even as a young child that what people were telling meant something very peculiar and unflattering about my mother. I was aware at how different I looked than my siblings, but didn?t understand DNA or genealogy. They were my family and I loved them.

I adored my mother so much then, that I just didn?t have the nerve to ever bring these things up to her. I was a child and loved our care-free relationship. She had been married and divorced several times and by the time I was in second grade she was raising my brother and me as a single mom. By the time I reached middle school, I fully identified myself not even as biracial, but just as black. A white classmate of mine from middle school just posted her recollection of this. Of course, that was an oversimplification of my story, but that was what made sense at that time. Adults who loved and knew me, on many occasions sat me down and told me that I was black. As you could imagine, this had a profound impact on me and soon became my truth.

Every friend I had was black, my girlfriends were black, I was seen as black, treated as black, and endured constant overt racism as a young black teenager. Never have I once identified myself as white. Not on forms, not for convenience or privilege, and not for fun and games, have I ever identified myself as white. I was never a white guy pretending to be black. Not once, ever, did it occur to me that I was being phony or fraudulent or fake. Quite the opposite?I always believed I was living the truest form of my self.

Race, love, hate, and me: A distinctly American story

That was published when he was in middle school?......

Oh yeah, it wasn't...

 

[biscuit1953]

 

[qwerty]

Word to your mother.....

 

[Ransom]

Yeah. In middle school...

Has lefty brainwashing fried your reason? Look at the date on that article: It was published only a year and a half ago. So in addition to being a fake black, he's faking being a fake black in middle school.

 

[Smellin Coffee]

Yeah. In middle school...

Has lefty brainwashing fried your reason? Look at the date on that article: It was published only a year and a half ago. So in addition to being a fake black, he's faking being a fake black in middle school.

No, it just wasn't an issue with him until then. The point was moot so there was no previous need to be addressed.

There is no reason to believe he is not who he says he is.

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

Here is a story that is far from fake:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/30/obamas-party-and-its-bitter-reckoning/

 

[Smellin Coffee]

Here is a story that is far from fake:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/30/obamas-party-and-its-bitter-reckoning/

Quote from the article:

This year, however, without Mr. Obama on the ticket, Americans finally felt free to reject another four years of high unemployment, anemic economic growth, unsustainable spending and record-breaking deficits and debt, unpopular and bankrupting socialized medicine, record numbers of people on food stamps and living in poverty, and the escalating threats of nuclear and other proliferation and Islamic fundamentalism.

Wrong. Clinton had way more of the popular vote than Trump. It wasn't the "Americans" who "finally felt free to reject another four years" but rather the Americans with the most Electoral College votes. The issue is "which" Americans rejected Obama's time vs. the "number of" Americans.

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

Here is a story that is far from fake:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/30/obamas-party-and-its-bitter-reckoning/

Quote from the article:

This year, however, without Mr. Obama on the ticket, Americans finally felt free to reject another four years of high unemployment, anemic economic growth, unsustainable spending and record-breaking deficits and debt, unpopular and bankrupting socialized medicine, record numbers of people on food stamps and living in poverty, and the escalating threats of nuclear and other proliferation and Islamic fundamentalism.

Wrong. Clinton had way more of the popular vote than Trump. It wasn't the "Americans" who "finally felt free to reject another four years" but rather the Americans with the most Electoral College votes. The issue is "which" Americans rejected Obama's time vs. the "number of" Americans.

"Under President Obama, Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 governors, 69 House seats, 13 Senate seats,? Cooper tweeted. ?That's some legacy.? Under President Obama, Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 governors, 69 House seats, 13 Senate seats. That's some legacy."

 

[Smellin Coffee]

Here is a story that is far from fake:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/30/obamas-party-and-its-bitter-reckoning/

Quote from the article:

This year, however, without Mr. Obama on the ticket, Americans finally felt free to reject another four years of high unemployment, anemic economic growth, unsustainable spending and record-breaking deficits and debt, unpopular and bankrupting socialized medicine, record numbers of people on food stamps and living in poverty, and the escalating threats of nuclear and other proliferation and Islamic fundamentalism.

Wrong. Clinton had way more of the popular vote than Trump. It wasn't the "Americans" who "finally felt free to reject another four years" but rather the Americans with the most Electoral College votes. The issue is "which" Americans rejected Obama's time vs. the "number of" Americans.

"Under President Obama, Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 governors, 69 House seats, 13 Senate seats,? Cooper tweeted. ?That's some legacy.? Under President Obama, Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 governors, 69 House seats, 13 Senate seats. That's some legacy."

No doubt. Still the Dems won the popular vote for the White House so the point the article was making based on quantitative votes is nothing but a straw man.

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

Here is a story that is far from fake:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/30/obamas-party-and-its-bitter-reckoning/

Quote from the article:

This year, however, without Mr. Obama on the ticket, Americans finally felt free to reject another four years of high unemployment, anemic economic growth, unsustainable spending and record-breaking deficits and debt, unpopular and bankrupting socialized medicine, record numbers of people on food stamps and living in poverty, and the escalating threats of nuclear and other proliferation and Islamic fundamentalism.

Wrong. Clinton had way more of the popular vote than Trump. It wasn't the "Americans" who "finally felt free to reject another four years" but rather the Americans with the most Electoral College votes. The issue is "which" Americans rejected Obama's time vs. the "number of" Americans.

"Under President Obama, Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 governors, 69 House seats, 13 Senate seats,? Cooper tweeted. ?That's some legacy.? Under President Obama, Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 governors, 69 House seats, 13 Senate seats. That's some legacy."

No doubt. Still the Dems won the popular vote for the White House so the point the article was making based on quantitative votes is nothing but a straw man.

I'm sure to you that is very clear!