cpizzle said:Preachers often talk of "suffering for Jesus" when they are actually just reaping the results of bad decisions.
subllibrm said:Is "suffering" to be expected by those who are in full time Christian ministry?
*I am working through the thought process that results in the clergy/laity divide.
cpizzle said:I oftentimes feel convicted about how good I actually have it. My church members love me and I have not had an angry member in over 4 years.
Walt said:subllibrm said:Is "suffering" to be expected by those who are in full time Christian ministry?
*I am working through the thought process that results in the clergy/laity divide.
Yes, but not only by them... it should be expected by all Christians.
Again, defining terms would be helpful -- what is meant by "suffering"? We live an a sin-soaked world, and we all have sin natures, so we will likely be disappointed by someone during our lives. We live in bodies cursed by sin - they break down, which is another form of suffering.
I'm not sure why people would think suffering is unique to Christians in full-time ministry -- by which I assume you mean Christians who early their living through a ministry, because, in a sense, all Christians are in a full-time ministry.
BibleGal said:It would be difficult to work Full Time if you are a Church Elder. Paul expects all men to work to support themselves and their family
A church is ran by a group of Elders (Male) so in the best circumstances, there should be no one assuming a huge burden
All other men of god to take the reins for a while when it's time. Be fair
This volunteer position isn't meant to be forever.
subllibrm said:How about your thoughts on this: "They don't understand what it means to be in ministry"
Does this mean that those who are in a ministry that pays are somehow different than those who are only volunteers? Again the clergy/laity distinction seems divisive and unnecessary.
Tarheel Baptist said:subllibrm said:How about your thoughts on this: "They don't understand what it means to be in ministry"
Does this mean that those who are in a ministry that pays are somehow different than those who are only volunteers? Again the clergy/laity distinction seems divisive and unnecessary.
Yet, you're the one who broached the subject.
subllibrm said:How about your thoughts on this: "They don't understand what it means to be in ministry"
Does this mean that those who are in a ministry that pays are somehow different than those who are only volunteers? Again the clergy/laity distinction seems divisive and unnecessary.
cpizzle said:"Ministry" is a broad term. All Christians are "in the ministry" in the sense that we have a work to do for Christ.
However, when Paul mentioned that God "put him in the ministry", it is obviously speaking of a higher calling.
We are all called to service, but few are called to "leadership." Leadership in the ministry does carry it's own set of burdens and blessings. This is especially true in "Full Time" Christian service. The expectations placed upon FT pastors and missionaries are enormous. In IFB circles, the "earthly reward" is hardly commiserate with the "labor." The constant judging of the leader and his family is probably the greatest cause of stress and misery. Every service, they are put on trial and one "slip up" can lose them an influential member. Even worse for FT assistants. The "Man of God" micromanages every aspect of their lives and pays them very low wages. Without the comfort of the Holy Ghost and a full reliance on divine grace, many of them burn out and become casualties. Or, they become pastors and joyfully wield the authority against others. They were beaten with whips, they will beat their assistants with scorpions.
cpizzle said:"Ministry" is a broad term. All Christians are "in the ministry" in the sense that we have a work to do for Christ.
However, when Paul mentioned that God "put him in the ministry", it is obviously speaking of a higher calling.
We are all called to service, but few are called to "leadership." Leadership in the ministry does carry it's own set of burdens and blessings. This is especially true in "Full Time" Christian service. The expectations placed upon FT pastors and missionaries are enormous. In IFB circles, the "earthly reward" is hardly commiserate with the "labor." The constant judging of the leader and his family is probably the greatest cause of stress and misery. Every service, they are put on trial and one "slip up" can lose them an influential member. Even worse for FT assistants. The "Man of God" micromanages every aspect of their lives and pays them very low wages. Without the comfort of the Holy Ghost and a full reliance on divine grace, many of them burn out and become casualties. Or, they become pastors and joyfully wield the authority against others. They were beaten with whips, they will beat their assistants with scorpions.
subllibrm said:How about your thoughts on this: "They don't understand what it means to be in ministry"
subllibrm said:Does this mean that those who are in a ministry that pays are somehow different than those who are only volunteers? Again the clergy/laity distinction seems divisive and unnecessary.
cpizzle said:We are all called to service, but few are called to "leadership." Leadership in the ministry does carry it's own set of burdens and blessings. This is especially true in "Full Time" Christian service. The expectations placed upon FT pastors and missionaries are enormous. In IFB circles, the "earthly reward" is hardly commiserate with the "labor." The constant judging of the leader and his family is probably the greatest cause of stress and misery. Every service, they are put on trial and one "slip up" can lose them an influential member. Even worse for FT assistants. The "Man of God" micromanages every aspect of their lives and pays them very low wages. Without the comfort of the Holy Ghost and a full reliance on divine grace, many of them burn out and become casualties. Or, they become pastors and joyfully wield the authority against others. They were beaten with whips, they will beat their assistants with scorpions.
Walt said:cpizzle said:We are all called to service, but few are called to "leadership." Leadership in the ministry does carry it's own set of burdens and blessings. This is especially true in "Full Time" Christian service. The expectations placed upon FT pastors and missionaries are enormous. In IFB circles, the "earthly reward" is hardly commiserate with the "labor." The constant judging of the leader and his family is probably the greatest cause of stress and misery. Every service, they are put on trial and one "slip up" can lose them an influential member. Even worse for FT assistants. The "Man of God" micromanages every aspect of their lives and pays them very low wages. Without the comfort of the Holy Ghost and a full reliance on divine grace, many of them burn out and become casualties. Or, they become pastors and joyfully wield the authority against others. They were beaten with whips, they will beat their assistants with scorpions.
Let's not forget the blessings... most pastors that I know of take off Mondays - most of the church members don't get ANY day off. They "work" their secular job Mon-Fri, do church visitation/soul-winning/bus work on Sat, and work their own "ministry" on Sunday (playing the piano, teaching SS, other items). So, they get NO days off at all, while the pastor gets off one day, and, usually, he can set his own hours and times.
In addition, many hotels or vacation spots have free housing (or deep discounts for ministers).
They don't have discounts for red-headed, Texan-speaking middle-aged guys, so I have to pay full price.