Sub, you think I didn't know that? I'm losing faith in your powers of perception.
You were comparing the alleged fiscal irresponsibility of Trump's 2k kickback to splurging on tattoos (despite Trump's tariffs in relatively extremely greater proportion paying down our debt, to the tune of 4 trillion dollars by some estimates). So I used the outlandish and impertinent claim of Dems about Trump's expensive East wing ballroom (even though no taxpayer money was being spent) to highlight the absurd length Dems go to in their TDS.
And to add insult to TDS of injury, once the Dems are told none of their tax dollars are being spent on the ballroom they pivot the argument to something about "bad optics", or "tearing down history". It seems like a danged if you do danged if you don't proposition.