I Could Use $10,000

So, you prefer that waiters hide their income and Trump is doing nonsense for helping your nonrelatives avoid taxes legally.
When the bill runs out they gonna do it anyway
 
It's a bribe which is wrong. Always do what is right. I was lost for a few days thank you for helping me back on the forum. My computer updated and knocked me off.
 
Demon-crats - vote for us and we will give you something for nothing - free college, free healthcare, free child care, free busfare.

Republicans - vote for us and we will give you something for nothing - $5,000 for everybody.

(Oops, the Republicans are already backing off on this - J D Vance says that the rich will not get $5000. So I get nothing - bummer).
 
I've been trying to punish the Liberals for years. Unfortunately, I live in a safe Liberal riding.
I hear ya. I live in SE Washington, in a fairly conservative district. Sadly, Washington's population center, King County (Seattle) drives Washington politics. I work in Idaho, where if you're planning on carrying out a shooting, someone will likely be shooting back, but libs are currently pouring $$$$ into the state trying to change the state constitution and reinstate abortion.
 
Demon-crats - vote for us and we will give you something for nothing - free college, free healthcare, free child care, free busfare.

Republicans - vote for us and we will give you something for nothing - $5,000 for everybody.

(Oops, the Republicans are already backing off on this - J D Vance says that the rich will not get $5000. So I get nothing - bummer).
If we’d stop spending money on these forever wars we’d get all that. And it wouldn’t be free. It’s our tax dollars. We’d be getting back what they take from us.
 
Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno has sponsored a bill to pay for Trump's $5000 payout.

img_6112.jpg

 
Last edited:

"It’s not the first time that an absurd thing like this has been proposed. In 1972, George McGovern, the Democrat running against Nixon, sincerely proposed giving a thousand dollars to every American, in today’s dollars, that’s the equivalent of about $8000. The proposition made him into something of a laughingstock. But the US was a different country then in many ways. . . .

"Trump and Vance argue that tariff revenue could help pay for the checks. Can a government really create a genuine dividend by taxing Americans indirectly and then handing some of the money back to them?

"Doug Casey: The idea is absurd. Tariffs are paid by citizens, not foreign exporters. They ultimately come out of the economy through higher prices and reduced trade. Tariffs result in a lower standard of living, more revenue in the hands of the government, and less in the hands of the people. The fact Trump wasn’t met with howls of laughter and boos when he floated the concept tells me that the economic understanding and the moral character of U.S. citizens has reached a new low."
 
Conservatives have been for free trade. Tarrifs are a tool to get those charging us tarrifs to match with zero trade deficit.
Tariffs are the reason why republicans carry on the American tradition of irresponsible deficit spending? I wasn't aware of that. But even if tariffs were to increase revenue to any measurable extent, pouring it into the economy would have the same inflationary effect that the Covid money did. Probably worse because it is significantly more money. Nothing conservative about the plan. Of course Mr. Trump isn't a conservative.

FWIW I don't believe that there are any fiscal conservatives left in either party.
 
Back
Top