I needed a diversion so I came here for an hour.

You didn't answer my question. Which group?
The network that he was operating exploiting underage girls.

That group!

A network is….a group or system of interconnected people or things.
A group of people who exchange information, contacts, and experience for professional or social purposes.

Prosecutors presented evidence that he operated a network exploiting underage girls.

That group of people. The group that he was networking with to exploit underage girls.

This is what our government is covering up.
 
And who were they?

What a weasel you are.
No, Ransom that is exactly who the government is covering up for. If there is a network that means there are others involved.

Who? I have no idea because that’s the cover up.

My government is hiding pedophiles. If people will do something like this and allow people to harm innocent children without consequences….I do not trust them.

This is why I do not believe generally that my government has the peoples best interest in mind. How can you?
 
Not in the least. But your conspiracy theory about who and why it is not all public is tinfoil hat wearing .
What conspiracy are you talking about? It was proven in court. There is no conspiracy. He had a network this is not a conspiracy. No one has been investigated this is not a conspiracy.

The cover up is not a conspiracy due to the fact that he had a network none of this is conspiracy.
 
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Most tinfoil hat loons at least try to sound plausible, you know.

What is asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence
Right because he had a network of people that he supplied underage girls to that worked at Walmart.
 
Back
Top