I needed a diversion so I came here for an hour.

Dr. Duck said:
@Bruh - which “group” are you referring to?
Click to expand...
The network.

There was a network of people (according to court documents) and no one has been investigated.

Who the network of people are is who the Trump administration is covering for.

Why is this so hard to understand?
 
Bruh said:
Why is this so hard to understand?
Click to expand...

Your inability to name names is easy to misunderstand. You're imagining it.

And while there very well be a secret cabal of wealthy and powerful child sex traffickers, they will be discovered and prosecuted in spite of your vague aspersions--in no way because of them. :ROFLMAO:
 
Ransom said:
We know that. Duh!

You said there was a government coverup of some "group" you can't identify, so you're avoiding an answer by changing the subject and repeating the obvious. Duh²!

You say there's a coverup, but you can't provide any evidence of a coverup. It's nothing but a supposition on your part--indistinguishable from make-believe.

As I said--even the most tinfoil-hatted whackjobs can at least tell us how to connect the dots. You don't even have any dots. :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
The network is the group. Names? I don’t know. That’s the cover up for the network that Epstein was running.

Question.

Do you believe that Epstein was involved in sex trafficking?
 
Bruh said:
The network is the group. Names? I don’t know. That’s the cover up for the network that Epstein was running.
Click to expand...

The group that you can't name, but you're certain it's covering up a network that you also can't name. :ROFLMAO:

Do you believe that Epstein was involved in sex trafficking?
Click to expand...

Sure. Do you? Because that's what the government tells you. :ROFLMAO:

I also believe he killed himself. Because I don't just believe everything people tell me.
 
Ransom said:
The group that you can't name, but you're certain it's covering up a network that you also can't name. :ROFLMAO:



Sure. Do you? Because that's what the government tells you. :ROFLMAO:

I also believe he killed himself. Because I don't just believe everything people tell me.
Click to expand...
Ok no cover up. No sex trafficking he’s an innocent man. You’re right I’m wrong. Im convinced the government has nothing to hide. I believe our government has our best interest in mind. I believe our government is looking out for kids.
 
Bruh said:
And no investigation into those names. Right? Or am I wrong?
Click to expand...
I think the group depends on which side is referring to the Epstein files.
I also think it took some form of investigation in order to get those names, but am no expert on the subject. Both Democrat and Republican administrations have had the files, but in my opinion, have not pressed them mainly because it gave neither side a cudgel with which to beat the opposition. Now both sides just say there’s a cover up because they’re protecting people on their side. It makes me weary.

Personally I think that if Trump could be implicated, the Democrats would have exposed it long ago.
 
Bruh said:
And no investigation into those names. Right? Or am I wrong?
Click to expand...
I’m sure there’s the possibility that a few high powered profiles are being redacted and protected, but I think most of it’s on the table now. There are always going to be certain people who receive protection. It’s a fact of life that I accept and don’t dwell on because I’m in no position to be privy to the 100% truth.
 
Tarheel Baptist said:
I think the group depends on which side is referring to the Epstein files.
I also think it took some form of investigation in order to get those names, but am no expert on the subject. Both Democrat and Republican administrations have had the files, but in my opinion, have not pressed them mainly because it gave neither side a cudgel with which to beat the opposition. Now both sides just say there’s a cover up because they’re protecting people on their side. It makes me weary.

Personally I think that if Trump could be implicated, the Democrats would have exposed it long ago.
Click to expand...
They’re protecting people on their side.

These guys over here keep saying I’m a loon with a tin foil hat. What people are they protecting on their side?

Trust me, I agree with what you’re saying. And this does not make me a tin foil hat guy.
 
Dr. Duck said:
I’m sure there’s the possibility that a few high powered profiles are being redacted and protected, but I think most of it’s on the table now. There are always going to be certain people who receive protection. It’s a fact of life that I accept and don’t dwell on because I’m in no position to be privy to the 100% truth.
Click to expand...
There are always going to be certain people who receive protection.

Does this make you a tin foil hat guy? Because this is what I’m being accused of when I say a group of people.

No investigation and no arrests outside of Epstein and Maxwell.

Therefore, there is a group of people because there is a network.

It’s a coverup by both sides, yes.
 
Bruh said:
Poncho 😂

I’m on a land at the moment.
Click to expand...
no..... it;s pocho ..you idiot... ....... go look it up..... the fact you don;t know what it means proves you are one......

and how would anyone know when you are on land or working on your rig?.... you post away 24/7 on the fff while claiming to be doing both..... 😆
 
Bruh said:
There are always going to be certain people who receive protection.

Does this make you a tin foil hat guy?
Click to expand...
No, but I think the difference is I’m referring to the likelihood that there might be a person or two not being revealed. This doesn’t mean they won’t be revealed. You seem to be indicating a large scale network of individuals.

BTW, are you familiar with what has happened to the now former Prince Andrew due to Epstein? Are you familiar with the professional fallout of individuals connected to the sordid scandal? Many have suffered, even if not behind bars in prison. The fact is many of the crimes occurred many years ago and we have statute of limitations that kick in, particularly when certain key players are dead.
 
aleshanee said:
no..... it;s pocho ..you idiot... ....... go look it up..... the fact you don;t know what it means proves you are one......

and how would anyone know when you are on land or working on your rig?.... you post away 24/7 on the fff while claiming to be doing both..... 😆
Click to expand...
Don’t you live in a halfway house or something??
 
Dr. Duck said:
No, but I think the difference is I’m referring to the likelihood that there might be a person or two not being revealed. This doesn’t mean they won’t be revealed. You seem to be indicating a large scale network of individuals.

BTW, are you familiar with what has happened to the now former Prince Andrew due to Epstein? Are you familiar with the professional fallout of individuals connected to the sordid scandal? Many have suffered, even if not behind bars in prison. The fact is many of the crimes occurred many years ago and we have statute of limitations that kick in, particularly when certain key players are dead.
Click to expand...
The court said it was a network.

A group or system of interconnected people or things: a trade network. That’s a large scale. Even I can understand this definition.

Yes I am familiar with what happened to Prince Andrew. Losing a title isn’t a consequence. He continues to live a very plush lifestyle in a castle or mansion or not like in a prison cell.

Key players? Who are these key players?

Many have suffered, even if not behind bars in prison.

I don’t know you but it feels like you are better than this. Suffered? Suffered how?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top