I needed a diversion so I came here for an hour.

[Bruh]

If you're investigated and there is not enough evidence to bring charges your name is not released. So it's entirely possible that the prosecutors chose to not file charges. Doing so doesn't mean they weren't investigated. In fact it means they were and the investigation didn't reveal enough evidence to warrant a trial that the prosecution couldn't win.

Therefore, he was wrongly convicted of having a sex trafficking network?

 

[Bruh]

Interesting indeed. I feel like I’m back in that logic philosophy class from so long ago. Perhaps Bruh would have been best served by stating that he thinks there’s a government coverup rather than stating there is a government coverup.

Are you saying that Epstein was wrongfully convicted of having a network with sex trafficking?

Network implies others were involved and he was convicted of this crime.

 

[Dr. Duck]

Are you saying that Epstein was wrongfully convicted of having a network with sex trafficking?

Network implies others were involved and he was convicted of this crime.

Nope, I’m saying I’m not convinced there’s a massive governmental coverup of his former network. After all, he did go to prison.