- Joined
- Jan 1, 2019
- Messages
- 1,155
- Reaction score
- 541
- Points
- 113
who cares what "american jews" think where israel is concerned?......most of them are ultra liberals who vote democrat.. ... being a jew in america does not make someone an israeli - nor does it give them any special insight where hamas and facing radical islamists is concerned..... most american jews have never even been to israel.... ... .... . . it;s the opinions of real israelis who actually live and work within range of hamas rockets that matter.... and most of them fully support trump and his ideas for what should be done in gaza......... .59% of American Jews are opposed to Trump's plan to "clear out" and take over Gaza, while 17% support it. This should settle the matter once and for all, especially for those who regard the Jews as, in some sense, "God's chosen people."
Loading…
www.timesofisrael.com
Thank you! I see people (even on the FFF) making this comment quite frequently, and I’ve always wondered why the thinking process of a Jewish American has any bearing on the thought process of Jews in Israel. No one ever says, “the Americans of Irish descent think…” or let’s poll African-Americans about a situation in Djibouti, Africa.” How ridiculous!who cares what "american jews" think where israel is concerned?......most of them are ultra liberals who vote democrat.. ... being a jew in america does not make someone an israeli - nor does it give them any special insight where hamas and facing radical islamists is concerned..
If what the residents in the area think is what really matters, why didn't it matter in 1947?Thank you! I see people (even on the FFF) making this comment quite frequently, and I’ve always wondered why the thinking process of a Jewish American has any bearing on the thought process of Jews in Israel. No one ever says, “the Americans of Irish descent think…” or let’s poll African-Americans about a situation in Djibouti, Africa.” How ridiculous!![]()
Because it ain’t 1947, dude! Time marches on….If what the residents in the area think is what really matters, why didn't it matter in 1947?
But the prize is their eventual expansion.
well why don;t you jump in your little time machine - go back to 1947 and ask president truman that question?...... none of us were around back then so how should we know?........... all i know is that it matters now....If what the residents in the area think is what really matters, why didn't it matter in 1947?
It was what the Jews that lived elsewhere were thinking that mattered the whole time.
When the Zionists were in favor of leaving Palestine under international control, it was for the purpose of an eventual independent Jewish state.
It's the same in regard to the Gaza strip. They're happy to have the international collaboration in cleaning it up and purging the Palestinians. But the prize is their eventual expansion.
I thought I heard him say something to the effect that "somebody ought to take over Gaza" and send the (so-called) Palestinians back where they came (the various countries around them - Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Etc.). Such would be better for the (so-called) Palestinians and everyone else in the region. Gaza ought to be a beautiful resort with a great deal of economic opportunity.Okay, okay, let's assume for the sake of argument (or to avoid an argument) that expelling all the Palestinians from Gaza is a great idea, that America has the unilateral right to do this, and we don't care what American Jews think, and we don't have any problem with sending the Marines to carry it out.
Where are we going to put all these Palestinians? President Trump has stated that we are not going to recompense them for lost real estate in Gaza - is that fair? Are we going to pay their relocation expense? Are we going to pay to construct or purchase housing for them in their new location? Where are we going to put them? Egypt, Jordan, Spain, Ireland and Norway have not agreed to accept them - how about Greenland? It this going to be any cheaper than our adventures in Afghanistan or Ukraine?
We can debate and fantasize about this all we want, but the bottom line is, this whole idea is impractical, and we really don't have the right to make it happen, and it shouldn't happen. Would we want anything like this done to us?
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told reporters “there’s probably a couple of kinks in that slinky” and predicted "obviously it’s not going to happen, I don’t know under what circumstance it would make sense even.”
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said the U.S. has “no business” occupying Gaza, adding “I thought we voted for America First.”
Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said “I don’t know that I think it’s the best use of United States resources” and that he doesn’t believe the U.S. should send troops to Gaza.
![]()
Republicans Break With Trump On Proposed Gaza Takeover—Here’s What To Know
“Obviously it’s not going to happen. I don’t know under what circumstance it would make sense even,” Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told reporters.www.forbes.com
Okay, okay, let's assume for the sake of argument (or to avoid an argument) that expelling all the Palestinians from Gaza is a great idea, that America has the unilateral right to do this, and we don't care what American Jews think, and we don't have any problem with sending the Marines to carry it out.
Where are we going to put all these Palestinians? President Trump has stated that we are not going to recompense them for lost real estate in Gaza - is that fair? Are we going to pay their relocation expense? Are we going to pay to construct or purchase housing for them in their new location? Where are we going to put them? Egypt, Jordan, Spain, Ireland and Norway have not agreed to accept them - how about Greenland? It this going to be any cheaper than our adventures in Afghanistan or Ukraine?
We can debate and fantasize about this all we want, but the bottom line is, this whole idea is impractical, and we really don't have the right to make it happen, and it shouldn't happen. Would we want anything like this done to us?
like you - they all seem to have gotten blown away by the rhetoric and completely misunderstood how trumps negotiates or operates...... they are imagining extremes and reacting to worst case scenarios that won;t happen if the arab world gives up it;s fetish for controlling the rest of the world through terror.....Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told reporters “there’s probably a couple of kinks in that slinky” and predicted "obviously it’s not going to happen, I don’t know under what circumstance it would make sense even.”
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said the U.S. has “no business” occupying Gaza, adding “I thought we voted for America First.”
Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said “I don’t know that I think it’s the best use of United States resources” and that he doesn’t believe the U.S. should send troops to Gaza.
![]()
Republicans Break With Trump On Proposed Gaza Takeover—Here’s What To Know
“Obviously it’s not going to happen. I don’t know under what circumstance it would make sense even,” Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told reporters.www.forbes.com
Way more than that…they’ve been calling for the complete annihilation of Israel for years. I’ve noticed Ekk never gets upset about that point (for some strange reason)prior to the october 7th terror attacks and the palestinian calls for the extermination of israel that followed
More precisely, it was the Ottomans. And their alliance with Germany was probably more about defeating the British Empire than anything , just like our alliance with Communist Russia was about defeating the Axis powers.because palestinians had supported hitler just a few years before... .... in fact they were on the side of nazi germany
palestinians will be returned to gaza when gaza is rebuilt
Correction... I was confusing the WWs. I shouldn't post while at work. Anyway, the Ottomans were allied formally with Germany in WWI, but fast forward to WWII where a people would naturally collaborate with the enemies of their oppressors. Yet no one in Palestine was goose-stepping to Deutschland Uber Alles.More precisely, it was the Ottomans. And their alliance with Germany was probably more about defeating the British Empire than anything , just like our alliance with Communist Russia was about defeating the Axis powers.
When the Ottoman Empire was divided into Arab States, why was Palestine not given to sole Arab rule?
I have an idea, just get the U.N. to mandate it like the League of Nations did a hundred years ago.If we Americans do not want to take in millions of illegal migrants that the Latin American countries want to dump on us, then why should we expect other nations to do what we are not willing to do, and how can we force them to do so?
You're a sage.Because it ain’t 1947, dude! Time marches on….
t will be israeli troops that over see it.
And all the "Christians" said "Amen!"
![]()
Trump Approves $3 Billion Weapons Transfer to Israel - News From Antiwar.com
The White House used emergency powers to approve a $3 billion weapons transfer to Israel. The package includes arms that the Joe Biden administration was hesitant to send to Tel Aviv. On Friday, the Pentagon announced three arms packages for Israel totaling over $3 billion. The first sale is 35,500…news.antiwar.com
Clearly they're antisemitic.Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told reporters “there’s probably a couple of kinks in that slinky” and predicted "obviously it’s not going to happen, I don’t know under what circumstance it would make sense even.”
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said the U.S. has “no business” occupying Gaza, adding “I thought we voted for America First.”
Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said “I don’t know that I think it’s the best use of United States resources” and that he doesn’t believe the U.S. should send troops to Gaza.
![]()
Republicans Break With Trump On Proposed Gaza Takeover—Here’s What To Know
“Obviously it’s not going to happen. I don’t know under what circumstance it would make sense even,” Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told reporters.www.forbes.com
When one's land is promised to another people by a foreign government, it would seem to be the understandable reaction.Way more than that…they’ve been calling for the complete annihilation of Israel for years. I’ve noticed Ekk never gets upset about that point (for some strange reason)