I was told there would be Rooooshin Kollusion.

Tarheel Baptist

Tarheel Baptist

Well-known member
Doctor
Elect
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
10,334
Reaction score
2,074
Points
113
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/mainstream-media-celebrities-stunned-as-mueller-report-filed-with-no-new-indictments-planned
 
Tarheel Baptist said:
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/mainstream-media-celebrities-stunned-as-mueller-report-filed-with-no-new-indictments-planned
Click to expand...

It's a sad day for the socialists.
 
I heard that a toll free number has been set up so that distraught liberals can call and get counseling. The number is 1-800-TOLD-U-SO

LOL!!  ;D  ;D
 
So Mueller's investigations yielded NO indictments? Hmmm...

Point is, the truth is in that report and we don't know what the report entails. Perhaps it implicates or perhaps exonerates Trump directly. There is no doubt his campaign colluded, even if he had no knowledge of it.

The point is to get to the truth. If Trump had no knowledge of the collusion, cool. Brings peace of mind to me he wasn't intentionally treasonous.

Funny though, to date, how many Trump folks were indicted or plead guilty with the two year investigation yet the Benghazi investigation over 6 years didn't yield any indictments or plea deals. Zero. Granted, this does not mean crime wasn't committed, but rather there was not enough evidence of intentional crime to convict and certainly not toward the number of both people and specific crimes the Trump Crime Machine committed.

So yeah, there was collusion. Whether or not Trump orchestrated or knew about it is another thing. But hey, don't let the truth sway you from Faux News propaganda!
 
Smellin Coffee said:
the Benghazi investigation over 6 years didn't yield any indictments or plea deals. Zero.
Click to expand...

Clinton M.O.

Dead men tell no tales.
 
Smellin Coffee said:
So Mueller's investigations yielded NO indictments? Hmmm...

Point is, the truth is in that report and we don't know what the report entails. Perhaps it implicates or perhaps exonerates Trump directly. There is no doubt his campaign colluded, even if he had no knowledge of it.

The point is to get to the truth. If Trump had no knowledge of the collusion, cool. Brings peace of mind to me he wasn't intentionally treasonous.

Funny though, to date, how many Trump folks were indicted or plead guilty with the two year investigation yet the Benghazi investigation over 6 years didn't yield any indictments or plea deals. Zero. Granted, this does not mean crime wasn't committed, but rather there was not enough evidence of intentional crime to convict and certainly not toward the number of both people and specific crimes the Trump Crime Machine committed.

So yeah, there was collusion. Whether or not Trump orchestrated or knew about it is another thing. But hey, don't let the truth sway you from Faux News propaganda!
Click to expand...

There is going to be an investigation into Muller colluding with the Russians to influence his investigation into Trump not colluding withthe Russians.

Don?t worry Elmer, they?ll get evil old Muller for not finding anything but process crimes.

Heh...heh...heh... ;)
 
Mr President, we?re sorry...
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/435552-apologies-to-president-trump
 
Smellin Coffee said:
So Mueller's investigations yielded NO indictments? Hmmm...

Point is, the truth is in that report and we don't know what the report entails. Perhaps it implicates or perhaps exonerates Trump directly. There is no doubt his campaign colluded, even if he had no knowledge of it.

The point is to get to the truth. If Trump had no knowledge of the collusion, cool. Brings peace of mind to me he wasn't intentionally treasonous.

Funny though, to date, how many Trump folks were indicted or plead guilty with the two year investigation yet the Benghazi investigation over 6 years didn't yield any indictments or plea deals. Zero. Granted, this does not mean crime wasn't committed, but rather there was not enough evidence of intentional crime to convict and certainly not toward the number of both people and specific crimes the Trump Crime Machine committed.

So yeah, there was collusion. Whether or not Trump orchestrated or knew about it is another thing. But hey, don't let the truth sway you from Faux News propaganda!
Click to expand...

Facts are important things...how many of those indictments of any of the President's people are for colluding with Russia?
 
T-Bone said:
Facts are important things...how many of those indictments of any of the President's people are for colluding with Russia?
Click to expand...

ZERO
 
Hope fully a few of them get saved before the Lord returns......

the bad news is gonna keep coming for them
 
http://www.facebook.com/BenSwannRealityCheck/videos/435550310548930/
 
Start at 6:15

http://youtu.be/Rkl35Gr2CWI
 
e471182e3315e0df89af3bfe83dc3bcf.jpg
 
http://www.bitchute.com/video/YpVYlXdJZbSh/
 
T-Bone said:
Smellin Coffee said:
So Mueller's investigations yielded NO indictments? Hmmm...

Point is, the truth is in that report and we don't know what the report entails. Perhaps it implicates or perhaps exonerates Trump directly. There is no doubt his campaign colluded, even if he had no knowledge of it.

The point is to get to the truth. If Trump had no knowledge of the collusion, cool. Brings peace of mind to me he wasn't intentionally treasonous.

Funny though, to date, how many Trump folks were indicted or plead guilty with the two year investigation yet the Benghazi investigation over 6 years didn't yield any indictments or plea deals. Zero. Granted, this does not mean crime wasn't committed, but rather there was not enough evidence of intentional crime to convict and certainly not toward the number of both people and specific crimes the Trump Crime Machine committed.

So yeah, there was collusion. Whether or not Trump orchestrated or knew about it is another thing. But hey, don't let the truth sway you from Faux News propaganda!
Click to expand...

Facts are important things...how many of those indictments of any of the President's people are for colluding with Russia?
Click to expand...

True. But how many of the President's people were indicted or plead out for obstruction of justice and/or lying to investigators ABOUT the Russian collusion?


Remember, we don't have proof yet of what Mueller's report says. All we have to go by is the word of the guy Trump hired to exonerate him because the guy before him recused himself and wouldn't provide Trump cover.

Make the report public to prove it to the American people.


Is it any wonder why the Dems and the rest of us don't believe him after 9000+ documented lies, as well as all the criminal activity he brought into the White House?

I hope Mueller's report becomes public and clearly proves his innocence once and for all. That would put some of us at ease that there wasn't collusion, despite Russian interference.


Sorry, I'm not going to trust a serial liar nor those he put in position to protect him, until proven innocent.

What was Russia's ties with the NRA and the NRA's ties with the Republican party?

Why did Barr's son-in-law recently get a job working with Trump on "legal issues"?


Why did Barr wite a nineteen-page unsolicited memo to Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein, criticizing "Mueller's 'Obstruction' Theory" then as AG, he wrote a three-and-a-half-page memo summarizing the entire investigation? Is it ethical to give an admitted biased judge the right to implicate/exonerate?

What is going to happen with the Trump implications in campaign finance issues currently being investigated by the SDNY?

Even if no collusion, what is being done to stop Russian interference in the 2020 election, especially since they support the Republican Party?

It seems to me if the Mueller Report DID completely exonerate Trump and his team, then the report should be released, just like Trump asked publicly.

Oh, and for people complaing about the financing of the investigation, in December, the investigation reported bringing in almost double than its cost:

http://fortune.com/2018/12/14/mueller-investigation-cost-tax-cheats/

Not to mention, (for you "Law & Order" people), arrests both of citizens and foreign influencers for crimes commited in or against the US, so it was not a "waste of taxpayer funding". After all, if police raid a warehouse looking for gems from a jewelry heist and don't find jewels but find bricks of cocaine instead, would that be considered a "waste of taxpayer funding"? I don't think so.

Collusion or not, it was a needed investigation and there are still too many unanswered questions, some of which could be answered if the MR gets revealed to the public.
 
Smellin Coffee said:
T-Bone said:
Smellin Coffee said:
So Mueller's investigations yielded NO indictments? Hmmm...

Point is, the truth is in that report and we don't know what the report entails. Perhaps it implicates or perhaps exonerates Trump directly. There is no doubt his campaign colluded, even if he had no knowledge of it.

The point is to get to the truth. If Trump had no knowledge of the collusion, cool. Brings peace of mind to me he wasn't intentionally treasonous.

Funny though, to date, how many Trump folks were indicted or plead guilty with the two year investigation yet the Benghazi investigation over 6 years didn't yield any indictments or plea deals. Zero. Granted, this does not mean crime wasn't committed, but rather there was not enough evidence of intentional crime to convict and certainly not toward the number of both people and specific crimes the Trump Crime Machine committed.

So yeah, there was collusion. Whether or not Trump orchestrated or knew about it is another thing. But hey, don't let the truth sway you from Faux News propaganda!
Click to expand...

Facts are important things...how many of those indictments of any of the President's people are for colluding with Russia?
Click to expand...

True. But how many of the President's people were indicted or plead out for obstruction of justice and/or lying to investigators ABOUT the Russian collusion?


Remember, we don't have proof yet of what Mueller's report says. All we have to go by is the word of the guy Trump hired to exonerate him because the guy before him recused himself and wouldn't provide Trump cover.

Make the report public to prove it to the American people.


Is it any wonder why the Dems and the rest of us don't believe him after 9000+ documented lies, as well as all the criminal activity he brought into the White House?

I hope Mueller's report becomes public and clearly proves his innocence once and for all. That would put some of us at ease that there wasn't collusion, despite Russian interference.


Sorry, I'm not going to trust a serial liar nor those he put in position to protect him, until proven innocent.

What was Russia's ties with the NRA and the NRA's ties with the Republican party?

Why did Barr's son-in-law recently get a job working with Trump on "legal issues"?


Why did Barr wite a nineteen-page unsolicited memo to Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein, criticizing "Mueller's 'Obstruction' Theory" then as AG, he wrote a three-and-a-half-page memo summarizing the entire investigation? Is it ethical to give an admitted biased judge the right to implicate/exonerate?

What is going to happen with the Trump implications in campaign finance issues currently being investigated by the SDNY?

Even if no collusion, what is being done to stop Russian interference in the 2020 election, especially since they support the Republican Party?

It seems to me if the Mueller Report DID completely exonerate Trump and his team, then the report should be released, just like Trump asked publicly.

Oh, and for people complaing about the financing of the investigation, in December, the investigation reported bringing in almost double than its cost:

http://fortune.com/2018/12/14/mueller-investigation-cost-tax-cheats/

Not to mention, (for you "Law & Order" people), arrests both of citizens and foreign influencers for crimes commited in or against the US, so it was not a "waste of taxpayer funding". After all, if police raid a warehouse looking for gems from a jewelry heist and don't find jewels but find bricks of cocaine instead, would that be considered a "waste of taxpayer funding"? I don't think so.

Collusion or not, it was a needed investigation and there are still too many unanswered questions, some of which could be answered if the MR gets revealed to the public.
Click to expand...

Your first sentence make the rest of your statement moot.  How do you lie about what did not happen?  Answer that question and maybe you can possibly see that many of the other indictments were the result of a investigator who had no restrictions of power and were part of setting the stage for how awful the President really is...with or without any evidence of him being so.
 
Smellin Coffee said:
T-Bone said:
Smellin Coffee said:
So Mueller's investigations yielded NO indictments? Hmmm...

Point is, the truth is in that report and we don't know what the report entails. Perhaps it implicates or perhaps exonerates Trump directly. There is no doubt his campaign colluded, even if he had no knowledge of it.

The point is to get to the truth. If Trump had no knowledge of the collusion, cool. Brings peace of mind to me he wasn't intentionally treasonous.

Funny though, to date, how many Trump folks were indicted or plead guilty with the two year investigation yet the Benghazi investigation over 6 years didn't yield any indictments or plea deals. Zero. Granted, this does not mean crime wasn't committed, but rather there was not enough evidence of intentional crime to convict and certainly not toward the number of both people and specific crimes the Trump Crime Machine committed.

So yeah, there was collusion. Whether or not Trump orchestrated or knew about it is another thing. But hey, don't let the truth sway you from Faux News propaganda!
Click to expand...

Facts are important things...how many of those indictments of any of the President's people are for colluding with Russia?
Click to expand...

True. But how many of the President's people were indicted or plead out for obstruction of justice and/or lying to investigators ABOUT the Russian collusion?


Remember, we don't have proof yet of what Mueller's report says. All we have to go by is the word of the guy Trump hired to exonerate him because the guy before him recused himself and wouldn't provide Trump cover.

Make the report public to prove it to the American people.


Is it any wonder why the Dems and the rest of us don't believe him after 9000+ documented lies, as well as all the criminal activity he brought into the White House?

I hope Mueller's report becomes public and clearly proves his innocence once and for all. That would put some of us at ease that there wasn't collusion, despite Russian interference.


Sorry, I'm not going to trust a serial liar nor those he put in position to protect him, until proven innocent.

What was Russia's ties with the NRA and the NRA's ties with the Republican party?

Why did Barr's son-in-law recently get a job working with Trump on "legal issues"?


Why did Barr wite a nineteen-page unsolicited memo to Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein, criticizing "Mueller's 'Obstruction' Theory" then as AG, he wrote a three-and-a-half-page memo summarizing the entire investigation? Is it ethical to give an admitted biased judge the right to implicate/exonerate?

What is going to happen with the Trump implications in campaign finance issues currently being investigated by the SDNY?

Even if no collusion, what is being done to stop Russian interference in the 2020 election, especially since they support the Republican Party?

It seems to me if the Mueller Report DID completely exonerate Trump and his team, then the report should be released, just like Trump asked publicly.

Oh, and for people complaing about the financing of the investigation, in December, the investigation reported bringing in almost double than its cost:

http://fortune.com/2018/12/14/mueller-investigation-cost-tax-cheats/

Not to mention, (for you "Law & Order" people), arrests both of citizens and foreign influencers for crimes commited in or against the US, so it was not a "waste of taxpayer funding". After all, if police raid a warehouse looking for gems from a jewelry heist and don't find jewels but find bricks of cocaine instead, would that be considered a "waste of taxpayer funding"? I don't think so.

Collusion or not, it was a needed investigation and there are still too many unanswered questions, some of which could be answered if the MR gets revealed to the public.
Click to expand...

We will have Muller and some Democrat lawyers look into all of that for you... ;)
For real collusion, look at socialist liberal democrats colluding with Venezuela.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top