If you don't listen to Fox News or Rush....

In short,  you cannot provide a link where I have stated what you claim I have stated.

Let me be blunt: you have no business being in a pulpit. You are dishonest, uncharitable, a slanderer, and more closely align yourself with modern American conservatism that the teachings of Jesus. You would lead people to follow a personal political ideal over the incarnate God.
 
rsc2a said:
In short,  you cannot provide a link where I have stated what you claim I have stated.

Let me be blunt: you have no business being in a pulpit. You are dishonest, uncharitable, a slanderer, and more closely align yourself with modern American conservatism that the teachings of Jesus. You would lead people to follow a personal political ideal over the incarnate God.

I note you don't answer ANY of my charges concerning your lack of first hand knowledge of Rush's positions or prove your slanderous accusations against him.

I am sorry I exposed your ridiculous position of questioning and criticizing Rush without first hand knowledge of what he actually believes. It does make you look short sighted and biased, which is the very thing you accuse me/us of.

Let me be blunt. You are dishonest, uncharitable, an ignorant slanderer, and judgemental.
And, concerning Rush, clueless...by your own admission.
 
Tarheel Baptist said:
As The Tomato has established even some liberals took them to task for it.

Wait...I thought liberals are all political lemmings that blindly follow their favorite liberal news source? You mean there are some that actually do discern against their own political party's beliefs and agenda at times?  :o

:-*
 
Tarheel Baptist said:
rsc2a said:
In short,  you cannot provide a link where I have stated what you claim I have stated.

Let me be blunt: you have no business being in a pulpit. You are dishonest, uncharitable, a slanderer, and more closely align yourself with modern American conservatism that the teachings of Jesus. You would lead people to follow a personal political ideal over the incarnate God.

I note you don't answer ANY of my charges concerning your lack of first hand knowledge of Rush's positions or prove your slanderous accusations against him.

I am sorry I exposed your ridiculous position of questioning and criticizing Rush without first hand knowledge of what he actually believes. It does make you look short sighted and biased, which is the very thing you accuse me/us of.

Do you have reading comprehension problems?  I've already said that I used to listen to him.

Let me be blunt. You are dishonest, uncharitable, an ignorant slanderer, and judgemental.
And, concerning Rush, clueless...by your own admission.

I'll take this as an admission on your part that you cannot find anything to prove the words that you shoved in my mouth nor do you care that they are blatantly false statements. In short, you are a liar and this fact doesn't bother you.
 
rsc2a said:
Tarheel Baptist said:
rsc2a said:
In short,  you cannot provide a link where I have stated what you claim I have stated.

Let me be blunt: you have no business being in a pulpit. You are dishonest, uncharitable, a slanderer, and more closely align yourself with modern American conservatism that the teachings of Jesus. You would lead people to follow a personal political ideal over the incarnate God.

I note you don't answer ANY of my charges concerning your lack of first hand knowledge of Rush's positions or prove your slanderous accusations against him.

I am sorry I exposed your ridiculous position of questioning and criticizing Rush without first hand knowledge of what he actually believes. It does make you look short sighted and biased, which is the very thing you accuse me/us of.

Do you have reading comprehension problems?  I've already said that I used to listen to him.

Let me be blunt. You are dishonest, uncharitable, an ignorant slanderer, and judgemental.
And, concerning Rush, clueless...by your own admission.

I'll take this as an admission on your part that you cannot find anything to prove the words that you shoved in my mouth nor do you care that they are blatantly false statements. In short, you are a liar and this fact doesn't bother you.


And I'll take your ignoring the point(s) as an admission that you did criticize Rush and those who listen to him with no proof, only hear-say. He's a racist because someone, somewhere said he was....

To claim disagreement with someone you listened to once upon a time in a galaxy far far away is intellectual malpractice and dishonesty.

 
Tarheel Baptist said:
To claim disagreement with someone you listened to once upon a time in a galaxy far far away is intellectual malpractice and dishonesty.

So you are unable to disagree with the "mainstream media" (there is that undefined word again) that you never listen to but somehow know what they say, think and report?
 
Tarheel Baptist said:
To claim disagreement with someone you listened to once upon a time in a galaxy far far away is intellectual malpractice and dishonesty.

Certainly you don't mean that. I mean, if what you say is true, I should still be a Hyles "yes-man" or I would be committing "intellectual malpractice and dishonesty" by rejecting his teaching, system and leadership.

Glad to know that a pastor encouraged Jesus' flock to remain blindly loyal to their church leadership when said leadership is wrong.

:)

 
TB is now moving the goalposts.  Instead of apologizing and admitting he was wrong,  "someone you have never listened to" has become "someone you haven't listened to in a long time".
 
rsc2a said:
TB is now moving the goalposts.  Instead of apologizing and admitting he was wrong,  "someone you have never listened to" has become "someone you haven't listened to in a long time".

I was merely correcting the record to correspond with your story...I don't listen...I used to listen.
I admire your dodge, changing the subject.
Again, you ignore my questions, how is Rush a racist?
What first have information do you have?
 
Smellin Coffee said:
Tarheel Baptist said:
To claim disagreement with someone you listened to once upon a time in a galaxy far far away is intellectual malpractice and dishonesty.

Certainly you don't mean that. I mean, if what you say is true, I should still be a Hyles "yes-man" or I would be committing "intellectual malpractice and dishonesty" by rejecting his teaching, system and leadership.

Glad to know that a pastor encouraged Jesus' flock to remain blindly loyal to their church leadership when said leadership is wrong.

:)

I admire your honest, always even handedness..... ::)
 
I have to admit they're beautiful and clearly very intelligent.  My favorites are Patti Ann Browne, Kimberly Guilfoyle, and Lauren Green (who is a very talented pianist, too). 

The Girls On Fox News Song
 
The Rogue Tomato said:
I have to admit they're beautiful and clearly very intelligent.  My favorites are Patti Ann Browne, Kimberly Guilfoyle, and Lauren Green (who is a very talented pianist, too). 

The Girls On Fox News Song

And, they don't wear pants or culottes!  :D
 
My favorite girls don't wear pants.
 
tumblr_nfgeogeJrW1s59098o1_1280.jpg
 
Back
Top