- Joined
- Jan 31, 2012
- Messages
- 7,533
- Reaction score
- 508
- Points
- 113
You spelled "BUTT" wrong....This is exactly what Mr. Trump was being. He really needs to grow up. He really needs to have a talk with God regarding his salvation.
Butt he’s against abortionYou spelled "BUTT" wrong....This is exactly what Mr. Trump was being. He really needs to grow up. He really needs to have a talk with God regarding his salvation.
It is because, as I have stayed here before, Trump is an egotistical, narcissistic, proud, arrogant man!
Weird cause when I said that he is a vile and disgusting man this place went nuts.It is because, as I have stayed here before, Trump is an egotistical, narcissistic, proud, arrogant man!
And, if given the choice between him and Harris today, I’d still vote for him.
Unless you’re revealing your most moral candidate.
He really needs to grow up. He really needs to have a talk with God regarding his salvation.
And a friend to Israel™.Butt he’s against abortion
I’d say he’s more than a friend. I’ve never understood how a man who is the president of the United States of America who claims to be Christian can celebrate another religion.And a friend to Israel™.
I have said this "Trump is an egotistical, narcissistic, proud, arrogant man" multiple times here...and belive I've added "petty and vindictive" once or twice.Weird cause when I said that he is a vile and disgusting man this place went nuts.
Sub lets principle guide his vote. You let pragmatism guide yours. I'm not sure why you get so upset at sub for that.Perhaps you get a stronger response because you come across as one who is our moral superior and intellectual better.
How do I allow pragmatism to guide my vote?Sub lets principle guide his vote. You let pragmatism guide yours. I'm not sure why you get so upset at sub for that.
Voting for the lesser of two evils instead of a 3rd party because the 3rd party has no chance of winning.How do I allow pragmatism to guide my vote?
Again with the imaginary.Sub is, in his opinion, our moral better. With that, I take issue.
Now that’s where we might disagree on what constitutes pragmatism. Did you find Sub’s perfect moral candidate? Was your mystery candidate perfect? Were his policy positions perfect? If not your argument is moot.Voting for the lesser of two evils instead of a 3rd party because the 3rd party has no chance of winning
Oh! The irony.Again with the imaginary.
Since I never claimed such a person existed I really don't have any responsibility to dance with your straw man.Now that’s where we might disagree on what constitutes pragmatism. Did you find Sub’s perfect moral candidate? Was your mystery candidate perfect? Were his policy positions perfect? If not your argument is moot.
Maybe you could tell us who is was…is.
And the citation for this conclusion?Sub is, in his opinion, our moral better. With that, I take issue.
As I said earlier:Since I never claimed such a person existed I really don't have any responsibility to dance with your straw man.
On the other hand it would be interesting to hear your thoughts on Mr. Trump's tribute to Rob Reiner.
Your body of work, over and over and over again, on this subject.And the citation for this conclusion?
Again avoiding commenting on his attack on a dead man.As I said earlier:
It is because, as I have stayed here before, Trump is an egotistical, narcissistic, proud, arrogant man!
And, if given the choice between him and Harris today, I’d still vote for him.
Unless you’re revealing your most moral candidate.