To your point #1. Religious texts are not meant to be scientific. Verses shouldn't necessarily be interpreted by other Scripture, but can be corroborated. Rather, they should be looked at in the context: What is the culture? What was the penman trying to say? How was it to have been perceived by the ORIGINAL listener/reader? For the OT, you have to back to Judaism and rabbinical teachings. To take Genesis 1-3 literally is a misinterpretation. Consult Judaism for cultural interpretation. After all, it is preserved in their holy text. Not saying to take their theology as infallible, but rather use their hermeneutic to learn how the passage was intended as viewed by their culture/religion.
To you point #2, science is logical, faith isn't. I am NOT suggesting that science is always right (it is very fluid) nor suggesting faith is always wrong, but you used the term "logically" which would indicate a form of science over faith-based hermeneutic.
On both points, interpreting Genesis 1-3 as literal science/anthropology is a pretty shaky viewpoint at best.