Malfeasance in Vaccine Release and Promotion

[Ekklesian]

Interview with Dr. Peter McCullough.

Starting at 1:11

"Well, the US FDA regulatory guidance and vaccines, and there have been modern vaccines, you don't have to pick the old ones. We've had modern vaccines. Shingles vaccines, hepatitis B, meningococcal vaccines demand a minimum of two years of safety data, two years, by regulatory. In fact, these are kinda written and codified into the regulatory rules for the manufacturers. That was all thrown out and said, "Two months. For COVID, two months." So two months of observational data.


"This idea that we could vaccinate people that were not even tested in the trials, that has never been done before. We have never just thrown a vaccine at somebody without having any data. None. So the very first pregnant woman that was vaccinated here in the United States, it was done with no knowledge of safety and no knowledge of efficacy. And the argument that we've heard is, "Well, COVID-19 is a bad illness; 600,000 people have died. The vaccine could help them, we should give it a shot. Come on, we should just give it a shot." Well, that 600,000 died, I've already told you, 85% of that was preventable with early treatment, which was actively suppressed and squashed. And not only that, is if this vaccine can help them, the vaccine better be safe. It better be safe. And my comments on the vaccine are, "Safety, safety safety, let's see it, let's see it."


"And Americans ought, just like the Americans should have been getting weekly updates on treatment innovations, Americans should have been getting weekly updates on vaccine safety. Very important. Weekly updates from our Federal officials on safety. Super important. Those two things are probably the two largest acts of malfeasance in all of medical regulatory history. It will go down in the history of malfeasance, wrongdoing by those of authority. How come there was no updates on treatment and no promotion of early treatment to reduce hospitalization and death? And now, when we release the vaccine, why are there no safety updates? Why are there no attempts for risk mitigation in terms of making the vaccine program safer? How do we have all these vaccines? How do we know we can vaccinate pregnant women? We know because of years and years and years of safety data. Before a vaccine has ever been injected into a pregnant woman, it's probably been tested for decades before we try it in a pregnant woman.


"We would never, out-of-the-box, take a brand new technology that's never been tested before, ever. And we know that the vaccine technology produces the dangerous spike protein. It produced the Wuhan spike protein, the spicule on the ball of the virus itself, which damages blood vessels and causes blood clotting, and all of them do. We would never unleash that into a pregnant woman's body. Americans have to understand something is very wrong. What's going on? What's going on now in the world? These are examples, are clear-cut examples of wrongdoing that is at such a high level, the groupthink is in the wrong direction in such a consistent and overwhelming way that people are being harmed in an extraordinary fashion."

 

[Ekklesian]

1:34

"I always estimated maybe 20 million people need to be vaccinated, but that didn't seem to satisfy the vaccine stakeholders, which are Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, AstraZeneca, and any others that come forward, the CDC, the FDA, and the NIH and the White House. Massive vaccine stakeholders. You could throw in Gates Foundation, World Health Organization. You can throw those in as well. Massive stakeholders. And they wanted everybody to be vaccinated without exception. No one will escape the needle. We've actually never had this before. And the vaccine process is extraordinary. There's a consent form, it says, "This is investigational. We don't know if it's gonna work. There's only two months of data. The side effects could be a sore arm all the way to death, and we don't know. Sign here. We need your identifying information, we need a barcode on the vial, we need you identified, and now you're in a database. You're vaccinated." And so this mass vaccination is extraordinarily concerning. We never vaccinate into the middle of a pandemic, never. We've never had an effective vaccine for respiratory virus including influenza; it's only modestly effective."

 

[Twisted]

I appreciate you posting truth. Keep it up.

 

[Ekklesian]

1:35

"We knew from the published data that the attack rates in placebo in the vaccine arms were less than 1%. So we know that the vaccine can have a less than 1% effect in the population. Why would it be any different than the clinical trials? We knew from the clinical trials that it didn't stop COVID-19, so people can get COVID-19 anyway. What would be this incredible drive to vaccinate everybody? And now, all my Lord, now the vaccine within a few months has been completely weaponized. Now travel is related to the vaccine. People can't go to school without the vaccine. People are losing their jobs without the vaccine. Believe me, there is something very, very potent in this vaccine. It should be disturbing to everybody. The word "vaccine" ought to be the most disturbing word that they have seen."

 

[Ekklesian]

1:36

"Now we have 12-year-old children who are told they can decide on their own whether or not they could take a vaccine. So about 70% of my patients are vaccinated, I'm very pro-vaccine, I've taken all the vaccines myself about 70%, and they are all vaccinated in December, January, and February. But as we sit here today in May, we have over 4,000 vaccine-related deaths, and over 10,000 hospitalizations. The limit to shut down a program is about 25 to 50 deaths. Swine flu in 1976, 25 deaths, they shut down the program, it's not safe. All the vaccines in the United States per year, what AmbuLink has reported in the database is about 200. We're talking about vaccinating, probably 500 million injections. Here in the United States at 100 million people vaccinated, this is far and away the most lethal, toxic biologic agent ever injected into a human body in American history, and it's going strong with no mention of safety by our officials, with wild enthusiasm by our hospitals and hospital administrators, with doctors supporting it. Doctors are saying now they won't see patients in their waiting room without the vaccine."

 

[Ekklesian]

1:42

"There are now papers written by prominent scientists, calling for a worldwide halt in the program. There are prominent virologists, many of them, including Noble Prize winners, who have said, "Listen, if we've vaccinate people and we create a very narrow incomplete library of immunity, which what the vaccine is, the vaccines are all targeted to the original Wuhan spike protein, which is long gone, that's extinct,


"patients are getting vaccinated to something that doesn't even exist anymore."


"That Wuhan spike protein is gone. We're hoping the immunity covers the other variants, but that narrow immunity is a setup. It's just like giving everybody a narrow spectrum antibiotic. If you did that, what would happen? We grow up super bugs.


"There are warnings out there saying, "Don't do this. Don't vaccinate the entire world. All we're gonna do is set ourselves up for a super bug that's gonna really wipe out populations." So for many reasons, the vaccine... Indiscriminate vaccination is a horrendous idea, it's a horrendous bio-weapon that's been thrust onto the public, and it's gonna cause great personal harm, which it already has, thousands of people lost their lives. I've never lost a direct patient, but I've had my patients lose their family members, lots of them. I've filled out a safety report on a patient who developed blood clots after one of the Pfizer, Moderna vaccine, and I'm telling you, it took half an hour to do it, there was many pages, and each page said, "Warning, federal offense punishable by severe fines and penalties" if I falsify the report.


"All those thousands of Americans that have died with the vaccine and hospitalizations in the database I think are real, and they are far beyond anything we've ever seen."

 

[tmjbog]

1:42

"There are now papers written by prominent scientists, calling for a worldwide halt in the program. There are prominent virologists, many of them, including Noble Prize winners, who have said, "Listen, if we've vaccinate people and we create a very narrow incomplete library of immunity, which what the vaccine is, the vaccines are all targeted to the original Wuhan spike protein, which is long gone, that's extinct,


"patients are getting vaccinated to something that doesn't even exist anymore."


"That Wuhan spike protein is gone. We're hoping the immunity covers the other variants, but that narrow immunity is a setup. It's just like giving everybody a narrow spectrum antibiotic. If you did that, what would happen? We grow up super bugs.


"There are warnings out there saying, "Don't do this. Don't vaccinate the entire world. All we're gonna do is set ourselves up for a super bug that's gonna really wipe out populations." So for many reasons, the vaccine... Indiscriminate vaccination is a horrendous idea, it's a horrendous bio-weapon that's been thrust onto the public, and it's gonna cause great personal harm, which it already has, thousands of people lost their lives. I've never lost a direct patient, but I've had my patients lose their family members, lots of them. I've filled out a safety report on a patient who developed blood clots after one of the Pfizer, Moderna vaccine, and I'm telling you, it took half an hour to do it, there was many pages, and each page said, "Warning, federal offense punishable by severe fines and penalties" if I falsify the report.


"All those thousands of Americans that have died with the vaccine and hospitalizations in the database I think are real, and they are far beyond anything we've ever seen."

I'm assuming the good doctor is referring to the VAERS report that he used to report the blood clot. I've attached a PDF of the form. As you can see the page and a half form has no warning on the top of the pages. I could see this form taking half an hour for someone from WV to complete, but I'm surprised it would take a medical doctor half an hour to complete.

 

[tmjbog]

1:34

"I always estimated maybe 20 million people need to be vaccinated, but that didn't seem to satisfy the vaccine stakeholders, which are Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, AstraZeneca, and any others that come forward, the CDC, the FDA, and the NIH and the White House. Massive vaccine stakeholders. You could throw in Gates Foundation, World Health Organization. You can throw those in as well. Massive stakeholders. And they wanted everybody to be vaccinated without exception. No one will escape the needle. We've actually never had this before. And the vaccine process is extraordinary. There's a consent form, it says, "This is investigational. We don't know if it's gonna work. There's only two months of data. The side effects could be a sore arm all the way to death, and we don't know. Sign here. We need your identifying information, we need a barcode on the vial, we need you identified, and now you're in a database. You're vaccinated." And so this mass vaccination is extraordinarily concerning. We never vaccinate into the middle of a pandemic, never. We've never had an effective vaccine for respiratory virus including influenza; it's only modestly effective."

Not to be one to let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory but we have nearly about 11 months of data not, not two.

 

[tmjbog]

1:36

"Now we have 12-year-old children who are told they can decide on their own whether or not they could take a vaccine. So about 70% of my patients are vaccinated, I'm very pro-vaccine, I've taken all the vaccines myself about 70%, and they are all vaccinated in December, January, and February. But as we sit here today in May, we have over 4,000 vaccine-related deaths, and over 10,000 hospitalizations. The limit to shut down a program is about 25 to 50 deaths. Swine flu in 1976, 25 deaths, they shut down the program, it's not safe. All the vaccines in the United States per year, what AmbuLink has reported in the database is about 200. We're talking about vaccinating, probably 500 million injections. Here in the United States at 100 million people vaccinated, this is far and away the most lethal, toxic biologic agent ever injected into a human body in American history, and it's going strong with no mention of safety by our officials, with wild enthusiasm by our hospitals and hospital administrators, with doctors supporting it. Doctors are saying now they won't see patients in their waiting room without the vaccine."

Of course the 4,000 deaths number comes from the VAERS system in which anyone can submit a claim of adverse reaction. I've attached a PDF of the form in another post. What the doctor misses is that dying some point after a vaccine is not the same as dying from a vaccine. I could go distribute apple sauce to 10,000 nursing home patients. If I go back a week later and 3 of them had died it doesn't mean my apple sauce killed them. Here's what David Gorski had to say about the good doctor's knowledge of the VAERS system:

"Dr. McCullough is also shockingly ignorant of how VAERS works. He claims that only a health care worker can access the system and that a patient or a loved one has to contact a physician or health care worker to enter a report. That is completely wrong. Indeed, one of the complaints about VAERS is that anybody—and I do mean anybody—can enter a report. It is this openness that is simultaneously one of VAERS greatest strengths and weaknesses. It’s a weakness in that this openness allows for gaming of the system, as lawyers for parents seeking to sue vaccine manufacturers for autism as a “vaccine injury” did 15 years ago. Seriously, this is an error huge enough to make me wonder about everything else, in particular whether he got his MPH out of a cereal box. This guy has an MPH and doesn’t know (or didn’t bother to find out) how VAERS actually works and that there are other vaccine safety monitoring systems other than VAERS? "

The COVID-19 “Vaccine Holocaust”: The latest antivaccine messaging

The latest antivaccine disinformation consists of pointing to the large numbers of reports of death (and other adverse events) to the VAERS database. It's nonsense.

sciencebasedmedicine.org

 

[Ekklesian]

I'm assuming the good doctor is referring to the VAERS report that he used to report the blood clot. I've attached a PDF of the form. As you can see the page and a half form has no warning on the top of the pages. I could see this form taking half an hour for someone from WV to complete, but I'm surprised it would take a medical doctor half an hour to complete.

You know what they say about assumptions.

 

[Ekklesian]

Not to be one to let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory but we have nearly about 11 months of data not, not two.

11 months of VAERS on the Covid vaccine? Wow. Time travel.

 

[Ekklesian]

Of course the 4,000 deaths number comes from the VAERS system in which anyone can submit a claim of adverse reaction. I've attached a PDF of the form in another post. What the doctor misses is that dying some point after a vaccine is not the same as dying from a vaccine. I could go distribute apple sauce to 10,000 nursing home patients. If I go back a week later and 3 of them had died it doesn't mean my apple sauce killed them. Here's what David Gorski had to say about the good doctor's knowledge of the VAERS system:

"Dr. McCullough is also shockingly ignorant of how VAERS works. He claims that only a health care worker can access the system and that a patient or a loved one has to contact a physician or health care worker to enter a report. That is completely wrong. Indeed, one of the complaints about VAERS is that anybody—and I do mean anybody—can enter a report. It is this openness that is simultaneously one of VAERS greatest strengths and weaknesses. It’s a weakness in that this openness allows for gaming of the system, as lawyers for parents seeking to sue vaccine manufacturers for autism as a “vaccine injury” did 15 years ago. Seriously, this is an error huge enough to make me wonder about everything else, in particular whether he got his MPH out of a cereal box. This guy has an MPH and doesn’t know (or didn’t bother to find out) how VAERS actually works and that there are other vaccine safety monitoring systems other than VAERS? "

The COVID-19 “Vaccine Holocaust”: The latest antivaccine messaging

The latest antivaccine disinformation consists of pointing to the large numbers of reports of death (and other adverse events) to the VAERS database. It's nonsense.

sciencebasedmedicine.org

*sigh*

tmjborg: Your doc is a quack. Look, I found something written by a quack that says so!

 

[tmjbog]

11 months of VAERS on the Covid vaccine? Wow. Time travel.

The beloved doc didn't mention VAERS when referencing there was only 2 months of data. However, I was incorrect, there isn't 11 months of data. There is 14 months of data. Clinical trials actually started in March 2020.

 

[Ekklesian]

tmjborg,

I'll save you some time. Look for the Journeyman Pictures series, Perspectives on the Pandemic. There you will find some people who were hitherto unimpeachable authorities until they countered the official narrative. I may cite one or two more of them in the future.

You can get a head start in finding Leftist blogger hit pieces on them.

 

[Ekklesian]

The beloved doc didn't mention VAERS when referencing there was only 2 months of data. However, I was incorrect, there isn't 11 months of data. There is 14 months of data. Clinical trials actually started in March 2020.

What trial went for 14 months . . . oh wait. You mean some testing started fourteen months ago. That's not 14 months of data.

Where did you go to school?

 

[tmjbog]

*sigh*

tmjborg: Your doc is a quack. Look, I found something written by a quack that says so!

You don't have to listen to what this other doc says research it yourself. Is the good doc right when he says only health professionals can submit a claim in VAERS. Is he correct when he says the form is many pages, takes 30 minutes for a doctor to fill out, and has federal legal warnings plastered atop every page. Go find the answer to those questions and you will know whether Dr. McCullough has any credibility.

 

[Ekklesian]

Group think, not medicine.

15:55

"When do we shunt patients away from one hospital... The fear that Ebola created because of this idea was terribly contagious and fatal quickly, I think set us on edge, and with SARS-CoV-2 virus, what we learned is the average person sits at home for two weeks, there's no immediate lethality to the virus. In fact, we've got a long window of time to make a diagnosis, organize treatment, and prevent hospitalization and death. So SARS-CoV-2 was very different from Ebola, but we look at other conditions where we readily accept the fact that somebody can fall ill at home, but if we start treatment early with an infection, we can save the patient. That exists for community-acquired pneumonias. It occurs for various forms of staff infection, staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome, it occurs for diverticulitis and abdominal conditions, it occurs for skin infections, various forms of cellulitis. It occurs from meningitis. For instance, if someone had a forming meningitis, we wouldn't say, Listen to sit at home for two weeks, and then if you're really, really bad and you're having seizures and you can't even breathe anymore, then come in the hospital and we'll start treatment.

"So the different unique aspect of the medical response to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 was for the first time we had an infectious disease where the medical community settled into a groupthink, and this was supported by the NIH, the CDC, the FDA, the American Medical Association, all the medical societies, it was supported by these societies to tell doctors, don't touch this virus, let patients stay at home, let them get as sick as humanly possible, and then when they can't breathe anymore, then go to the hospital. In fact, it was shocking in October 8th when the National Institutes of Health came out with our first set of treatment guidelines, because prior to that, none of the societies had any treatment guidelines, they actually didn't tell doctors how to treat the illness. Now there were suggestions about what should be done in the hospital but Americans cared about what was going on when they got sick at home, and the first set of guidelines said, you get sick at home, don't do anything. Don't do anything, come into the hospital when you really can't breathe, still don't do anything. Until a patient needs oxygen, then start doing something, then actually give the first anti-viral drug, which was Remdesivir.

"Well that's 14 days after the virus had already started replicating, by that time, the virus is long gone. When people can't breathe, the problem is micro-blood clotting in the lungs, so the federal agencies, CDC, the NIH and FDA, were enormously inept in terms of perceiving what this problem was. Incredibly inept in applying any type of judgment or direction to doctors. And what had happened among the doctors was we're so terribly frightened, we're not gonna do anything unless we have the intellectual support from our associations, from our federal agencies, from our medical societies, and it was just the opposite of what medicine had always been. Medicine had always been early innovation by doctors, empiric treatment, small studies, randomized trials, and then sponsored large randomized trials in that order, and then after large randomized trials, then guidelines bodies would then look at all those large randomized trials, make determinations of what should be done, and then those guidelines bodies would issue guidelines, and then the federal agencies would follow the guidelines. That's exactly what we do for mammography, colonoscopy, treatment of myocardial infarction, treatment of pneumonia. It always started out with early empiricism, then getting to guidelines and agency statements years later."

 

[tmjbog]

What trial went for 14 months . . . oh wait. You mean some testing started fourteen months ago. That's not 14 months of data.

Where did you go to school?

Clinical trials phase I-shots in arms. As far as data, if that word doesn't work for you than we can just say that they were tracking those who were involved in the phase I clinical trials and jotting down notes and information and reporting on progress and adverse effects as well as other details of those involved in the clinical trials. Below is a link for a summary of the the Moderna phase I trials. If you scroll down to "Outcome Measures" you will see what items they were tracking. This data...I mean information was reported to the relevant parties involved. Also provided screenshot showing the start date of phase I clinical trials was March 16, 2020.

ClinicalTrials.gov

clinicaltrials.gov

 

[Ekklesian]

Clinical trials phase I-shots in arms. As far as data, if that word doesn't work for you than we can just say that they were tracking those who were involved in the phase I clinical trials and jotting down notes and information and reporting on progress and adverse effects as well as other details of those involved in the clinical trials. Below is a link for a summary of the the Moderna phase I trials. If you scroll down to "Outcome Measures" you will see what items they were tracking. This data...I mean information was reported to the relevant parties involved. Also provided screenshot showing the start date of phase I clinical trials was March 16, 2020.

ClinicalTrials.gov

clinicaltrials.gov

You've posted a 1.8% death rate multiple times, not understanding how death rates are calculated or the difference between that and a case fatality rate, even after being told.

And you are going to lecture me on the data from the clinical trials? That's notfourteen months of data.

As far as VAERS and the good doctor, who is actually a good doctor, btw, and you are not (Let's just keep that in perspective) "The site says this: Safety monitoring in VAERS relies on receiving reports of vaccine adverse events from healthcare professionals. The following information provides guidance to healthcare professionals about how to submit accurate, complete and timely VAERS reports."

Now, wouldn't that imply a form and certain access that is granted to health care professionals that isn't the same form that is publicly accessible to your creepy Uncle Arthur?

What information would be required from a professional that isn't from your creepy uncle?

Unless you sling fries at McDonald's, you probably don't get to use the 1040 EZ form for your taxes. And, you probably pay someone to do them. I don't know, but I'd guess 30 minutes is a good time to fill out your tax forms. And, though I can't say for certain, I'll bet it's a good 30 minutes for a professions to make an accurate and complete report? Even if its the publicly available form I've downloaded, which is much simpler than the 1040A, and slightly more involved than a W4.

But you have to do better than hit pieces by agenda-driven atheists who are, by their own admission, routinely criticized by medical practioners.

 

[tmjbog]

As far as VAERS and the good doctor, who is actually a good doctor, btw, and you are not (Let's just keep that in perspective) "The site says this: Safety monitoring in VAERS relies on receiving reports of vaccine adverse events from healthcare professionals. The following information provides guidance to healthcare professionals about how to submit accurate, complete and timely VAERS reports."

Now, wouldn't that imply a form and certain access that is granted to health care professionals that isn't the same form that is publicly accessible to your creepy Uncle Arthur?

What information would be required from a professional that isn't from your creepy uncle?

Nope. Same form. From first page of the form you see the option to select whether you are the patient/healthcare provider/parent/other (screenshot provided). Indeed my creepy Uncle Arthur can submit. That's why the data...er information provided in VAERS is good for spotting potential trends but not as reliable for knowing which deaths/injuries were actually caused by the vaccine. On a side note this very issue was a big deal in early 2000s when anti vaxxers were posting claims about adverse reactions to vaccines in an effort to bolster a class action lawsuit.