Many people flooded the comments in support of the young woman who works in marketing, with several calling for a four-day work week.
That 80% work week probably doesn't come with an 80% salary in their minds, either.
Brielle continued: 'I leave here and get on the train at like 7.30am and I don't get home until 6.15pm earliest. I don't have the time to do anything.'
That's terrible! At my first full-time job, at a mine in northern Ontario, the company school bus that took me out to the minesite was only one hour earlier than that.
'I don't have energy to work out, like that's out of the window. I'm so upset. Oh my god.'
Rule of thumb: When someone appends "oh my god" to her complaint, it automatically renders the complaint trivial.
She reflected that it 'could be worse,' stating: 'I know I could be working longer, but I get off and it's literally pitch black, like I don't have energy.'
You think it's bad now, toots, wait until winter when they turn the clocks back.
Another commenter added: '40 hour work week was designed with a homemaker to take care of house tasks.
'We need dual incomes now, so that's not possible. No time for anything.'
Yep. Women gained equal access to the workplace in the 1960s-70s, and since then the family wage has gone out the window, because instead of having a single breadwinner and a full-time homemaker, families were now dual-income and both spouses started working outside the home.
I don't think that's inherently bad. But if you don't like it, thank a feminist.
One person quipped: 'The other generations have gaslit themselves to say this was ok.'
It
is OK. You want to have fun, go on dates, meet friends and eat in nice restaurants? Wonderful. Me too. How do you bankroll those things? You earn money at a job.
That's the tradeoff.
If you can't hack being a 9-5 employee, start your own business and set your own hours. All the best in your future endeavours.