San Diego mosque shooters

ALAYMAN said:
Well, suit yourself. This is called the fighting forum for a reason, and you did invite him to have some fun and not take things so seriously. He’s having fun with you, lol.

The lesson that you should have learned is that he rarely makes statements without calculated verification of his opinions before he makes the statements. In this case, he showed you that there is indeed basis in fact for the two shooters having ties and sympathies to the philosophies and types of people that follow Fuentes.
Click to expand...
It is called the fighting forum and I have a life outside of the internet. Unlike many on here. And I’ll admit that he got me and good for him.
 
Bruh said:
It is called the fighting forum and I have a life outside of the internet. Unlike many on here. And I’ll admit that he got me and good for him.
Click to expand...
You keep implying other people have more time on their hands than you do as an excuse for not answering challenges to your arguments. Don’t you think that sounds a bit too convenient and self-serving? How do you know what other FFF people’s lives are like and how much they are involved in, particularly compared to yours? Or could this be just another assumption of yours that allows you to justify giving answers that are shallow and merely entertainment based?
 
ALAYMAN said:
You keep implying other people have more time on their hands than you do as an excuse for not answering challenges to your arguments. Don’t you think that sounds a bit too convenient and self-serving? How do you know what other FFF people’s lives are like and how much they are involved in, particularly compared to yours? Or could this be just another assumption of yours that allows you to justify giving answers that are shallow and merely entertainment based?
Click to expand...
I’m speaking specifically about Ransom. He actually went back as far as 2012 to try and dig up dirt on me from my old post 😂 his life is the FFF.

Look if you have time to try and trick people and to go back as far as 2012 trying to dig up dirt…….the internet might be your life….ya think?

The assumption is, I’m here to have fun and I do not take it that seriously. I admit when I’m wrong and go to task when I believe I’m right.

Like the Epstein files.
Nancy Pelosi stock market making millions and bc she’s never been investigated by the US government she definitely not doing insider trading.
Thomas Massie loosing Kentucky has nothing to do with him not taking money from AIPAC
 
ALAYMAN said:
Well, suit yourself. This is called the fighting forum for a reason, and you did invite him to have some fun and not take things so seriously. He’s having fun with you, lol.

The lesson that you should have learned is that he rarely makes statements without calculated verification of his opinions before he makes the statements. In this case, he showed you that there is indeed basis in fact for the two shooters having ties and sympathies to the philosophies and types of people that follow Fuentes.
Click to expand...
I agree he definitely puts a lot of thought and effort into the internet. It’s my understanding that this has become the life of a lot of people these days.
 
Bruh said:
I agree he definitely puts a lot of thought and effort into the internet. It’s my understanding that this has become the life of a lot of people these days.
Click to expand...
OK, so your standard answer when confronted (by Ransom, at least) on things that you post will be to say that you don’t have enough time to give any significant rebuttal to his argument and that he needs to get a life and stop spending as much time on the Internet. Got it.
 
ALAYMAN said:
OK, so your standard answer when confronted (by Ransom, at least) on things that you post will be to say that you don’t have enough time to give any significant rebuttal to his argument and that he needs to get a life and stop spending as much time on the Internet. Got it.
Click to expand...
No. This is one topic, the school shooting. Other topics I stood my ground. I was wrong on this one. He did his homework and I was going into work and gave my answer 😂 that’s what happened. I’ll do my best and try to take Ransom more seriously 😂

Epstein didn’t work alone in his sex trafficking network. I stood my ground and didn’t back down. My government is covering for some very rich high profile people.

Nancy Pelosi insider trading.
Iran war. We are over there on behalf of another country who refuses to put their boots on the ground, kinda like Iraq.

After Iraq how is it possible that anyone believes anything this government says?
 
ALAYMAN said:
OK, so your standard answer when confronted (by Ransom, at least) on things that you post will be to say that you don’t have enough time to give any significant rebuttal to his argument and that he needs to get a life and stop spending as much time on the Internet. Got it.
Click to expand...
Yeah maybe he should spend some time outside of the internet maybe spend some time out side in nature, I don’t know walk the neighborhood, go to the city park, how bout Starbucks? Take up gardening, maybe his church has a track he can walk around….how bout…… mow the lawn 😂 maybe less time on the internet would produce a girlfriend…the people skills would probably need some work though.
 
Bruh said:
No. This is one topic, the school shooting. Other topics I stood my ground. I was wrong on this one. He did his homework and I was going into work and gave my answer 😂 that’s what happened. I’ll do my best and try to take Ransom more seriously 😂

Epstein didn’t work alone in his sex trafficking network. I stood my ground and didn’t back down. My government is covering for some very rich high profile people.

Nancy Pelosi insider trading.
Iran war. We are over there on behalf of another country who refuses to put their boots on the ground, kinda like Iraq.

After Iraq how is it possible that anyone believes anything this government says?
Click to expand...
I would encourage you to engage the person’s arguments rather than just toss out memes, slogans, or other people’s ideas whom you follow/respect.

I will take one example from your latest list. The “After Iraq how is it possible that anyone believes anything this government says” statement for instance. Just because something was true in one situation doesn’t mean it’s equally true in similar situations. To quote an old axiom “correlation does not equal causation”. If you don’t know what that means, take time to look it up. It’s a great scientific proof that enables us to use proper deductive reasoning when coming to conclusions.
 
Bruh said:
I’m speaking specifically about Ransom. He actually went back as far as 2012 to try and dig up dirt on me from my old post 😂 his life is the FFF.
Click to expand...
Imagine being so clueless you think running a search engine takes more than 30 seconds.

Duh!

:ROFLMAO:
 
Bruh said:
I agree he definitely puts a lot of thought and effort into the internet. It’s my understanding that this has become the life of a lot of people these days.
Click to expand...
God blessed you with a wife and kids. Not everyone in life was given that blessing. No need to poke fun at those who weren’t. I don’t know you aside from this forum, but I still feel like you’re a better person than that.
 
ALAYMAN said:
I would encourage you to engage the person’s arguments rather than just toss out memes, slogans, or other people’s ideas whom you follow/respect.

I will take one example from your latest list. The “After Iraq how is it possible that anyone believes anything this government says” statement for instance. Just because something was true in one situation doesn’t mean it’s equally true in similar situations. To quote an old axiom “correlation does not equal causation”. If you don’t know what that means, take time to look it up. It’s a great scientific proof that enables us to use proper deductive reasoning when coming to conclusions.
Click to expand...
It was a blatant lie, this is a fact I don’t believe anyone refutes at this point. Therefore, how can they be trusted.

How many times does someone need to lie to you before you stop believing anything they say.

Everything is built on trust. People died in Iraq. Moms, dads, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, cousins, sons, daughters not to mention the innocent children that died. This is a reality that people here in America continue to live with. All because our government lied to us. Just like our government lied about Vietnam.

Does this make sense?

So please explain to me why now are they 100% telling you the truth?
 
Dr. Duck said:
God blessed you with a wife and kids. Not everyone in life was given that blessing. No need to poke fun at those who weren’t. I don’t know you aside from this forum, but I still feel like you’re a better person than that.
Click to expand...
Awwwwee thanks
:)
 
Bruh said:
It was a blatant lie, this is a fact I don’t believe anyone refutes at this point. Therefore, how can they be trusted.

How many times does someone need to lie to you before you stop believing anything they say.

Everything is built on trust. People died in Iraq. Moms, dads, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, cousins, sons, daughters not to mention the innocent children that died. This is a reality that people here in America continue to live with. All because our government lied to us. Just like our government lied about Vietnam.

Does this make sense?

So please explain to me why now are they 100% telling you the truth?
Click to expand...
You are still arguing for the same weak conclusion. They lied (which I agree with btw) so that means they are lying.

The distortion of information and WMDs to justify the invasion of Iraq have been proven to be misused at best. That was nearly 25 years ago. Your conclusion that they are lying is problematic for two reasons. 1. This is a completely different "they" running the country. 2. While time may prove that there have been lies, it is too soon for us to know that. In essence you are arguing for your gut instincts, not verifiable facts.

I'm not good with the names of particular argumentation tactics like Ransom. But I do recognize that your thinking process is very similar to the "if we can put a man on the moon why can't we....?" logic. If it has a special name I will leave it to someone else to present it to us.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top