Shocking Interview with Son of Steve Anderson

I'll never understand you NonTrump types. 🤦🏻‍♂️

Tell us what policies we should be resisiting right now?
There are no policies that are draining the swamp. Unless, you can point to some that are doing that?
 
Debating a negative is not logical.

This last week, Pulte got rid of a ton of "swamp" people. Trump cleaned up the election security group... the biggest problem "nonelected Feds" just went through the Supreme Court.

You may not like the speed and amount of unreported firings, but the swamp is certainly "losing ground."

Still... the question is unanswered "what policies should we be resisting?"
 
The Epstein files are a policy? 6 million documents have been released.

Well... the Middle East seems to be going quite fast and is productive.
 
The Epstein files are a policy? 6 million documents have been released.

Well... the Middle East seems to be going quite fast and is productive.
Obviously no one wants the names of the victims to be known. But what about all the other names that have been redacted? How can anyone defend this?
 
Obviously no one wants the names of the victims to be known. But what about all the other names that have been redacted? How can anyone defend this?

Defend what? Not publicly releasing the Epstein files? So the alleged perpetrators can be tried and convicted in the public mind?

Are you sure the FBI or whomever isn't conducting an investigation as we speak? How do you know this?
 
I
Defend what? Not publicly releasing the Epstein files? So the alleged perpetrators can be tried and convicted in the public mind?

Are you sure the FBI or whomever isn't conducting an investigation as we speak? How do you know this?
hope your right. JD just said on Rogans podcast that Epstein definitely had connections at the highest levels with our government and Israel. That being said, if they are secretly investigating he wouldn’t have said that.
 
Obviously no one wants the names of the victims to be known. But what about all the other names that have been redacted? How can anyone defend this?
If my name was in the files, I would want it redacted because I know I'm innocent - but the way society is today, just a hint of possible association and you get crucified.

Having said that, I do want everyone investigated that the documents mention if they were mentioned in a way that raises suspicion of illegal activity.
 
I

hope your right.

You didn't answer my question, though. You just assume, out of your own ignorance, that since the Epstein files are not made public, that no investigation is going on.
 
You didn't answer my question, though. You just assume, out of your own ignorance, that since the Epstein files are not made public, that no investigation is going on.
Defending not publicly releasing the Epstein files without redacting names.

JD just said on Rogans podcast that Epstein definitely had connections at the highest levels with our government and Israel. That being said, if they are secretly investigating he wouldn’t have said that.
 
Back
Top