sword said:
http://www.christianitytoday.com/gleanings/2016/april/major-money-problems-of-church-planters-vs-other-pastors.html
The Major Money Problems of Church Planters vs. Other Pastors
Why your pastors can't save themselves.
Article states 1/3 of pastors have no money in savings at all. Over 50% have $50,000 or less saved for retirement. Most have no pension plan and some do not even pay into S.S.
1 in 5 church planters make less than $35,000 a year.
Article says the numbers are much worse for church planters are even worse. Statistics say most sr. pastors do not work a secular job in addition to their pastoral career.
Should pastors live in near poverty and what is the answer? Should churches fund retirement plans for their staff members?
http://www.christianitytoday.com/gleanings/2016/april/major-money-problems-of-church-planters-vs-other-pastors.html
Pastors are not along in this lack of savings... Americans approaching retirement have an average of $15,000 saved. That is appalling!
Large business have been dropping pension plans over the last decade or so, so it's not surprising to find more and more people, pastors included, with no pension plan.
It has only been recently that it is now recommended that pastors do NOT opt-out of social security -- when I was a new graduate, the move was to get pastors off of social security, and I suspect waves of pastors did so. I only wish I could have opted out -- I've paid them a LOT of money over my working career, and I doubt I'll ever get it back.
A church planter is a pastor; however, a pastor is not a church planter. We were talking about pastors, savings, and retirement, and then a church planter salary is brought up.
When a church is started from scratch, there is no way that they can afford to pay a pastor; the church planter must either be independently wealthy, or be supported by the sending church, or else take a secular job.
A work is no longer a "church plant" when they can pay their pastor sufficiently that he is not dependent upon outside income. After that, I think the goal should be to pay the pastor around what the average member with a regular job earns per year. They should do all that they can that is legal to reduce the tax burden (in America, this usually results in "allowances" for home, car, gas, utilities - such things used to not be taxable).
On the plus side, the pastor of a small church (no staff, or family helping out) has NO ONE checking that he is at the church studying or otherwise working on "church business". Another bonus: Most pastors take every Monday off, whereas most of the congregation works seven days a week: Mon-Fri or Sat at their secular job, and then they "work" at church on Sunday, teaching classes, etc.
On the negative side, a pastor can be called any time of the day or night with member emergencies. A visiting child may misquote something from a Sunday School lesson/teacher, and the parent is all over the pastor about the church being a cult or else the teacher teaching heresy. Like it or not, he is the face of the church, with all the negatives that can bring.
A small church will not be able to pay what a larger church can.
Tom Brennan had a great series of articles about pastoral pay; specifically, the problems a church can run into when the pastor cannot pastor because of age: if he has no retirement, and the church tries to support him in retirement, they may not be able to afford a new pastor.