So my net.scumbag stalker is harassing my family now

[praise_yeshua]

You're the idiot that thinks that's proof of something.

And who's the idiot who thinks a screenshot is proof of something?

Who said it was? I didn't. Prove it. I said all along there was no iron clad proof. You're the ones that say it proved that you DIDN'T do it.

So blame FSSL. He is the one said it was proof you blathering moron.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Whether you believe this or not....I never done such things. Not to you. Not to anyone.

I didn't say you did.

The lady protests too much, methinks.

You said...

Yeah, well, since a) I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt and assuming you're not the net.psycho and b) you are in no position to identify and report said net.psycho,

 

[praise_yeshua]

I think Tomato is behind all of this.

He is the only one who knows Ransoms and mine phone numbers. So... There we are. It must be him.

That was fun!

You don't know that at all.

1. He said "think" not "know".
2. The point went right over your head.

You the onethat doesn't understand a cartage return and line space....

I was answering FSSL second line...

He clearing said that Mater was the ONLY ONE that knew their number. He didn't say "I THINK" when it came to that declaration...

 

[praise_yeshua]

2. The point went right over your head.

I'm amazed it didn't get caught on the point on his head.

I'm not the "smart one" with a stalker problem.

 

[FSSL]

This is fun!! Throw a tiny bit of conspiracy theory into the FFF mosh pit and PY and Tomato start body surfing!

 

[FSSL]

So blame FSSL. He is the one said it was proof you blathering moron.

Correction. Tomato was asked for proof and he offered up the screenshot which didn't match Scott's profile on Facebook which hasn't changed in two years.

What fun!!!

FSSL demanded proof.  So I asked my son for a screen shot, and posted the picture below with Ransom (Scott's) last name blurred out so as not to break forum rules.

 

[praise_yeshua]

So blame FSSL. He is the one said it was proof you blathering moron.

Correction. Tomato was asked for proof and he offered up the screenshot which didn't match Scott's profile on Facebook which hasn't changed in two years.

What fun!!!

FSSL demanded proof.  So I asked my son for a screen shot, and posted the picture below with Ransom (Scott's) last name blurred out so as not to break forum rules.

So you've been monitoring it for 2 years?

 

[praise_yeshua]

This is fun!! Throw a tiny bit of conspiracy theory into the FFF mosh pit and PY and Tomato start body surfing!

The entire thread is nothing more than a way for you and Ransom to continually bash those you disagree with. Its a farce. It really is....

 

[subllibrm]

And you all said I was crazy ...

Well ....

















;D

Love ya Timmy!

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

So blame FSSL. He is the one said it was proof you blathering moron.

Correction. Tomato was asked for proof and he offered up the screenshot which didn't match Scott's profile on Facebook which hasn't changed in two years.

What fun!!!

FSSL demanded proof.  So I asked my son for a screen shot, and posted the picture below with Ransom (Scott's) last name blurred out so as not to break forum rules.

So you've been monitoring it for 2 years?

You don't even need to change your profile pic.  As I have mentioned multiple times, you can easily set up multiple Facebook accounts, each with a different profile pic.  And you can block discovery on one, but not another, so that if you search for "Joe Schmoe", and Joe has 10 accounts, you'll only see the one(s) that don't have profile search blocked. 

Oh, and for the record, FSSL demanded proof in the form of a screen shot.  I provided the screen shot with Ransom's last name blurred out.  Then Ransom claimed I blurred it out because it's not his real last name.  So I provided the screen shot without the blur, showing that it really was Ransom's real last name.  Only then did the profile pic become the "proof" that it wasn't Ransom. 

It is entirely possible that someone ELSE created a Ransom account with Ransom's real name, which is why the profile pic didn't match, even though Ransom's real name did match.  If so, then I have to give that person credit for studying exactly the way Ransom talks and behaves, because the message he sent my son is almost word-for-word how Ransom responded here.  So, if you want to talk "mental instability", I can't think of anything more mentally unstable than studying someone's manner of speaking and then reproducing it exactly in order to harass someone.  So.... was it you posing as Ransom, FSSL? 

 

[FSSL]

It is entirely possible that someone ELSE created a Ransom account with Ransom's real name, which is why the profile pic didn't match, even though Ransom's real name did match.

Ahhh.... so it IS possible.

If so, then I have to give that person credit for studying exactly the way Ransom talks and behaves, because the message he sent my son is almost word-for-word how Ransom responded here.

Calling someone a troll is hardly a unique response. That was the only common word used in the exchange.

Until this admission, you have been unrelenting and claimed to have more proof "behind the scenes." You have been bluffing all along, hoping, that it really was Ransom.

 

[praise_yeshua]

So blame FSSL. He is the one said it was proof you blathering moron.

Correction. Tomato was asked for proof and he offered up the screenshot which didn't match Scott's profile on Facebook which hasn't changed in two years.

What fun!!!

FSSL demanded proof.  So I asked my son for a screen shot, and posted the picture below with Ransom (Scott's) last name blurred out so as not to break forum rules.

So you've been monitoring it for 2 years?

You don't even need to change your profile pic.  As I have mentioned multiple times, you can easily set up multiple Facebook accounts, each with a different profile pic.  And you can block discovery on one, but not another, so that if you search for "Joe Schmoe", and Joe has 10 accounts, you'll only see the one(s) that don't have profile search blocked. 

Oh, and for the record, FSSL demanded proof in the form of a screen shot.  I provided the screen shot with Ransom's last name blurred out.  Then Ransom claimed I blurred it out because it's not his real last name.  So I provided the screen shot without the blur, showing that it really was Ransom's real last name.  Only then did the profile pic become the "proof" that it wasn't Ransom. 

It is entirely possible that someone ELSE created a Ransom account with Ransom's real name, which is why the profile pic didn't match, even though Ransom's real name did match.  If so, then I have to give that person credit for studying exactly the way Ransom talks and behaves, because the message he sent my son is almost word-for-word how Ransom responded here.  So, if you want to talk "mental instability", I can't think of anything more mentally unstable than studying someone's manner of speaking and then reproducing it exactly in order to harass someone.  So.... was it you posing as Ransom, FSSL?

Its not worth it. It really isn't. I'm tired of arguing about it with them. This thread is a farse. Its only around to harass those who disagree with Ransom and FSSL.

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

So blame FSSL. He is the one said it was proof you blathering moron.

Correction. Tomato was asked for proof and he offered up the screenshot which didn't match Scott's profile on Facebook which hasn't changed in two years.

What fun!!!

FSSL demanded proof.  So I asked my son for a screen shot, and posted the picture below with Ransom (Scott's) last name blurred out so as not to break forum rules.

So you've been monitoring it for 2 years?

You don't even need to change your profile pic.  As I have mentioned multiple times, you can easily set up multiple Facebook accounts, each with a different profile pic.  And you can block discovery on one, but not another, so that if you search for "Joe Schmoe", and Joe has 10 accounts, you'll only see the one(s) that don't have profile search blocked. 

Oh, and for the record, FSSL demanded proof in the form of a screen shot.  I provided the screen shot with Ransom's last name blurred out.  Then Ransom claimed I blurred it out because it's not his real last name.  So I provided the screen shot without the blur, showing that it really was Ransom's real last name.  Only then did the profile pic become the "proof" that it wasn't Ransom. 

It is entirely possible that someone ELSE created a Ransom account with Ransom's real name, which is why the profile pic didn't match, even though Ransom's real name did match.  If so, then I have to give that person credit for studying exactly the way Ransom talks and behaves, because the message he sent my son is almost word-for-word how Ransom responded here.  So, if you want to talk "mental instability", I can't think of anything more mentally unstable than studying someone's manner of speaking and then reproducing it exactly in order to harass someone.  So.... was it you posing as Ransom, FSSL?

Its not worth it. It really isn't. I'm tired of arguing about it with them. This thread is a farse. Its only around to harass those who disagree with Ransom and FSSL.

I agree.  It's the ultimate irony.  The two people on here who cry the most about trolls, FSSL and Ransom, are spending all their time trolling now because they humiliated themselves and can't get past it. 

 

[FSSL]

Lol... That ignore button doesn't work

 

[FSSL]

So.... was it you posing as Ransom, FSSL?

It couldn't be. You already claimed to have tons of proof that it was Ransom.

 

[FreeToBeMe]

Its not worth it. It really isn't. I'm tired of arguing about it with them. This thread is a farse. Its only around to harass those who disagree with Ransom and FSSL.

Agreed.  This forum is and always has been merely a source of amusement for me, but the recent FSSL / Ransom / TRT debacle has taken it from amusement to a level below juvenile. 

 

[Ransom]

Its not worth it. It really isn't. I'm tired of arguing about it with them.

If you're neither stalker nor stalkee, then you have no one but yourself to blame for that, so quit whining.

 

[FSSL]

Its not worth it. It really isn't. I'm tired of arguing about it with them. This thread is a farse. Its only around to harass those who disagree with Ransom and FSSL.

Then why did you turn the thread to be all about you and Tomato?

 

[praise_yeshua]

Its not worth it. It really isn't. I'm tired of arguing about it with them. This thread is a farse. Its only around to harass those who disagree with Ransom and FSSL.

Then why did you turn the thread to be all about you and Tomato?

I didnt. You're the only allowing Ransom.to troll