SO NOW WE HAVE IT!

[Route_70]

I said the following to Ransom:  "You do nothing but scoff."

He responded with:  "That's my morality."

So he admits to being a scoffer.  This kind of behavior just proves my point, that Christianity is a fraud.

My threads are all intended to invoke discussion about topics that deeply divide us.  Instead of trolling someone else's thread I start my own.  Everyone has the option of ignoring me.  But not everyone does.  And in many cases, instead of being honest and responding respectfully the thread is trolled.

Personally I am not offended, but it should be obvious to anyone who is not already prejudiced that Ransom's comments are intended to be denigrating.  Instead of engaging in professional behavior, he scoffs.  Then when he gets a comment that is beyond his childish abilities to cope, he blocks the thread.

It is time for FSSL to demote Ransom, and replace him with someone with more maturity and professionalism.  I would do it, but I really do not have the time.

 

[FreeToBeMe]

It is time for FSSL to demote Ransom, and replace him with someone with more maturity and professionalism. 

It is time for you to get a life, troll.

 

[FSSL]

All I get from your threads is that you keep reminding us that you helped out a child molester (and wrongly criticizing the rest of us for not doing so).

You have fully let your "acts of righteousness be known. You have your reward."

 

[Route_70]

All I get from your threads is that you keep reminding us that you helped out a child molester (and wrongly criticizing the rest of us for not doing so).

Stop being a "homer."  All I have done is point out the salient fact that you can have all the justification for morality that you want; but what good is that if all you have is a system of morality and you do not act on that system of morality?

Furthermore, my criticism has been directed at the leadership of NCBC because I have direct and personal information about how they behaved.  The criticism I have toward certain members  of this forum is the petulant way they troll the threads I start -- and Ransom with the petulant and childish way he locks my threads ... for what good reason other than just because he can!

 

[Ransom]

First Rooty tries to argue that morality is subjective, then he starts complaining because I act in a way that is consistent with a subjective morality. Of course, he has no grounds for complaining: if morality is subjective, then mine's just as good as his.

In order to defend his worldview, Rooty has to steal ours. And when he gets called on it, he proves himself a whiner, a crybully, and a fruitcake.

 

[Ransom]

It is time for FSSL to demote Ransom,

I thought morality was subjective? Why are you demanding that others follow yours?

 

[Ransom]

Ransom with the petulant and childish way he locks my threads ... for what good reason other than just because he can!

That's subjective morality for you. Since there's no objective reason why I should behave in a certain way, my only justification need be that I feel like it.

I'm not going to lock this thread. Not because it's any different in kind from the ones I've already locked, but because I'm not in the mood.

If FSSL wants to lock it, on the other hand, who am I to judge him?

 

[T-Bone]

Someone needs a little cheese with his whine...  "someone mature", like Route 70 ...Bwhahahahahaha!

 

[FSSL]

The droning on and on about how "I, Route_70 and the only one who acts morally" when it comes to pedophiles is nauseating.

My system of morality is remarkably different.

1) I seek to expose the threat
2) I confront the threat following Galatians 6.1
3) I work along the guidelines of Matthew 6 to seek the individual's restoration.

Route_70... You only seek to expose threats and think you are the only one doing so. Your reward is to tell people on the internet that it was you. Unfortunately, your "morality" does nothing, zip, nada for the victim and for eternity.

What good have you really done by just exposing the threat, anonymously on the Internet, not seeking to restore the individual so future threats are exacerbated? The victim has only an average 18 months of freedom (assuming the pedophile is locked up).

With that... Go spread your "morality" somewhere else.

 

[Route_70]

My system of morality is remarkably different.

1) I seek to expose the threat
2) I confront the threat following Galatians 6.1
3) I work along the guidelines of Matthew 6 to seek the individual's restoration.

And my system of morality is based upon the law -- not the Bible.  And therein lies the reason why my system worked, in the case of one particular child molester -- and yours did not.  As a matter of fact yours most often leads to the continuance of child molestation.  To wit, your kind typically just shuffles the perpetrator off to another venue where he continues to ply his wicked trade, viz-a-viz, David Hyles, along with scores of others.

 

[Smellin Coffee]

My system of morality is remarkably different.

1) I seek to expose the threat
2) I confront the threat following Galatians 6.1
3) I work along the guidelines of Matthew 6 to seek the individual's restoration.

Can you give us an example (not naming any persons, of course) where you enacted this plan involving a child molester? Was the police notified/involved? How was the offender "restored"? Did you see the molester through the entire process from original confrontation through arrest/incarceration/release/restoration?

And would you have done this if the victim was one of your own children?

 

[Tarheel Baptist]

My system of morality is remarkably different.

1) I seek to expose the threat
2) I confront the threat following Galatians 6.1
3) I work along the guidelines of Matthew 6 to seek the individual's restoration.

Can you give us an example (not naming any persons, of course) where you enacted this plan involving a child molester? Was the police notified/involved? How was the offender "restored"? Did you see the molester through the entire process from original confrontation through arrest/incarceration/release/restoration?

And would you have done this if the victim was one of your own children?

To be consistent with BLM, before dealing with an accusation of abuse, we would first determine if the victim was black. If not, it doesn't matter.

 

[Jim Jones]

I want to know what lie was told to obtain employment by said poster?

An open atheist?

Hired at a baptist church school?

 

[FSSL]

On 5 occasions, I dealt with child molesters.

Of course, the police were involved. Some spent jail time, some I referred to police.

Only one came to full repentance. However, the entire church took action in all of these cases. The victims were treated as victims and given spiritual help and protection. Only 2 of the molesters (1 convicted; 1 not yet) are in churches today. One is doing quite well in a different church than the original molestation, but their world has become smaller (tightened restrictions) than the victim.

One of my children was a target (among many others). You cannot work in a sizable church and never expect to have to deal with this from time-to-time.

The self-righteous Route_70 can stuff it. His approach is actually, immoral. He wants to get glory from a tragic situation from people he never met. What good comes from that?

 

[Route_70]

I want to know what lie was told to obtain employment by said poster?

An open atheist?

Hired at a baptist church school?

Yes, it has occurred to me how this can happen.  If enough interest is generated I shall be glad to oblige in time.

However, in the meantime, isn't it a good thing that an atheist was hired by the Baptist Church School?  Think of it:  the victims and their families have indicated that were it not for me, the victims would not have had the courage to speak out as they did, and a child molester would still be in operation.  Of all those good God-fearing, church-going, Bible-toting, Baptists, not a single one of them had the courage or the morals to speak out, even though many of them knew.  It was left to the atheist to do the right thing.

Thank God he did!

 

[Route_70]

On 5 occasions, I dealt with child molesters.

Of course, the police were involved. Some spent jail time, some I referred to police.

Only one came to full repentance. However, the entire church took action in all of these cases. The victims were treated as victims and given spiritual help and protection. Only 2 of the molesters (1 convicted; 1 not yet) are in churches today. One is doing quite well in a different church than the original molestation, but their world has become smaller (tightened restrictions) than the victim.

One of my children was a target (among many others). You cannot work in a sizable church and never expect to have to deal with this from time-to-time.

The self-righteous Route_70 can stuff it. His approach is actually, immoral. He wants to get glory from a tragic situation from people he never met. What good comes from that?

So now you are the self-righteous one!

 

[Twisted]

It was left to the atheist to do the right thing.

Thank God he did!

Thanking someone you say doesn't exist?

There's probably a term for that but I don't know what it would be.

 

[Smellin Coffee]

My system of morality is remarkably different.

1) I seek to expose the threat
2) I confront the threat following Galatians 6.1
3) I work along the guidelines of Matthew 6 to seek the individual's restoration.

Can you give us an example (not naming any persons, of course) where you enacted this plan involving a child molester? Was the police notified/involved? How was the offender "restored"? Did you see the molester through the entire process from original confrontation through arrest/incarceration/release/restoration?

And would you have done this if the victim was one of your own children?

To be consistent with BLM, before dealing with an accusation of abuse, we would first determine if the victim was black. If not, it doesn't matter.

And yet, it is BLM journalists that point out whites being shot as well including this one. Where was the #AllLivesMatter group concerning these shootings? Nowhere to be seen or heard from.

Keep on spinning!

 

[T-Bone]

There's an "All Life Matters" group...that's a new one on me.

 

[Route_70]

The self-righteous Route_70 can stuff it. His approach is actually, immoral. He wants to get glory from a tragic situation from people he never met. What good comes from that?

Immoral or not it was the right thing to do.  I suppose you would have preferred that I had not interferred in that situation.  I taught at the school.  I was a member of the church.  Besides the pastor and possibly one other person I attended more services than anyone else.