Just John said:
I had soooo much to say and then the website goes down. Bummer. So a few thoughts:
1. The specific question M Kelly asked was how Trump would answer the question from HILLARY that he was part of the war on women based on his comments. Who doesn't think Trump would not get that question from Hillary or any other Dem in a debate. Better learn how to answer it now.
2. But he couldn't. He went on to prove exactly why that question is a problem for him. He retweeted that M Kelly was a "bimbo", implied she was on her period and that's why she was "unfair" and "mean" to him. (Waaahhhhh!). Someone else here also said M Kelly was a "bimbo"? What makes her a bimbo? (An "attractive but unintelligent women"). She is a lawyer, having represented Experian for nine years as well as other corporate clients and has made it to the top ranks of TV news. But you, Trump and others are calling her a "bimbo" because she gave your guy a legit question he couldn't handle. At least you haven't resorted to alluding to her aggressiveness as being on her period. Yep, good 'ol Donald. LOL
3. Called Frank Luntz a "slob" because he didn't like the results of Luntz' focus group. What a wuss. Actually Luntz is a very capable and sought after pollster and works mostly in the corporate world now because he has soured on the political world and the empty promises.
4. Complained how "overrated"and a lightweight M Kelly is....than posted tweet after tweet after tweet until 4:30 in the morning whining about her! LOL. What a thin-skinned baby. Methinks she really got to the "tough guy".
5. Questions were totally fair and relevant. EVERY candidate had at least one very difficult question. Trump just couldn't handle his. He was asked character issue questions more than policy questions because he hasn't made any policy. Is Fox just supposed to roll over and be easy because they are Rupublicans? That's not fair and balanced. (BTW...I have heard Trump say Ailes has kissed up and apologized. But I haven't heard anything from Ailes himself.
6. Some have been critical of the "raise your hand" question from Bret Bair. He has done the exact same thing in other debates. And when you want to ask 10 people a yes or no question what's wrong with asking for a show of hands....especially when it's the first thing on many people's minds.
7. Who cares what M Kelly said on Howard's Stern's show? She's not running for president. Where is the moral equivalent? (I remind you the question was posed as from Hillary's point of view).
8. More of the man-child's complaining after people hold him accountable: About Carly Fiorina after she told him there was no excuse for the crack he made M Kelly "wasn't fair :'( - Listening to her for 10 mins gives you a headache. About Erik Larson after being dis-invited to the RedState event for the same comments- "A major sleaze and buffoon"
9. Finally, I believe he is a very insecure person. For someone who really has accomplished so much it seems he has so much to prove and an incessant need to brag about EVERYTHING.., who his friends are, what he has, how HE is responsible for the success of everything, yada, yada, yada. He is exceptionally thin-skinned and really does act like a petulant child. Maybe that is what has pushed him to be so successful in business. If the planets were to align, the oceans to part and a fog of stupidity hang over the country on election day and Trump were elected, I sure hope Putin "treats him fair". :
1. Hilary was smoke screen to disguise bimbo's intent. Sure, they will ask the question now that bimbo asked it. Hilary hadn't said one thing about Trump till bimbo started it. Relying on the "it was coming anyway" is rather lame.
Yeah, cause the Democratic party opposition research isn't going to be smart enough to figure out asking asking the question that Trump has multiple examples of the same? Okay.
2. Trump didn't imply anything about "bimbo's" period. You're a moron if you think he's stupid enough to make such a mistake. Your depraved mind filled in the blanks. Its easy to settle it and the media could have settled it. They could have asked what he meant by "where ever". He would have told them what he meant. Instead, the dishonest morons ran with it. Apparently you're running with it.
Yes because we know that Trump is always in control of his mouth and would NEVER say something demeaning to somebody he's mad at. No way. He really meant to say "he saw blood coming out of her "NOSE" (as he later claimed) because that makes so much more sense. Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!
Yes. I did imply you're a moron by association. Its okay. Someone was going to imply it anyway. Maybe your wife or your children!!!
I shall wear your moron badge proudly.
See. See how easy it is to use such stupid logic. Logic that "bimbo" used in asking the question to start with.
I'm still looking.
3. Luntz got it horrible wrong. His polling in the focus group had 3 people that still supported Trump. Trump is STILL LEADING ALL THE POLLS.... POST DEBATE.
Let me help you out some. The focus group was a group of people who actually are engaged and VOTE. And also are together in the same room which affects group dynamics. All of the immediate "polls" following the debate were internet polls. I looked at the Drudge poll before the debate was even half over and Trump was already declared the debate "winner" at 40+%.
The first actual phone polling just came out Tuesday. (The NBC poll was an internet poll btw). Some Trump rose in and some he fell in. But one thing was very clear...his negative numbers went up. Hmmm. Just like in Luntz' group.
Trump explained that Luntz asked him for money and he refused. Luntz created a sku'd focus group to get back at Donald. Slob is a rather good word for him.
That's not what Trump said. He said Luntz wanted to work for him and Trump refused. Now of course this is the same Trump who claims he meant blood was coming from M Kelly's NOSE! LOL You have no proof whatsoever there was a purposely skewed group. And "slob" is a good word why?
4. Trump was mad. I would have been mad. She is overrated. OReilly created her. If he hadn't.... she'd still be wearing braless shirts and flashing skin to get attention. Which, by the way, leads into point 7.
Oh wait...you mean Donald "got mad" so he acted like a spurned little boy late into the morning on Twitter? It's not possible this same Donald would take a shot at "Mean Megyn" suggesting she was hormonal. Oh I forgot...He meant he could "see" blood coming out of her "nose". I am so "depraved" for thinking otherwise. Dear Lord, please forgive me. ;D
5. I hear you. No policy questions since you have no policy. That makes sense. Are you really that dumb? I don't think you are....
I guess I am. I thought you were really agreeing with me. LOL
6. A MAN.... .would have asked Trump directly. He would asked a DIRECT question.... instead of bringing everyone else into the question. If you're going to do that kind of questioning.... then all of the questions should have been given to all the candidates and let everyone answer the same question. They didn't do this. They focused this one question to them all to make Trump look bad.
Dude, how many political debates have you watched? Besides, a good candidate learns how to answer questions without looking bad.
7. Hilary was a smoke screen. "bimbo" used it for cover. Again. Hilary hadn't said one thing about Trump. You have no evidence she would.
Are you really this naive? I don't have proof that the sun will come up tomorrow but based on past history and probability I'm pretty darn sure. And like the sun will most likely come up in the morning the democratic candidate will try to make the "war on woman" issue. You have made many foolish statements but I do believe this takes the cake.
The Stern video is important. So important that 'bimbo' won't even discuss it. She did the interview to get attention. She got attention. NOW!!!!!!!!!!!! she wants to distance herself from it.
She did the debate because it's her job! LOL. All the more reason she shouldn't be the focus of it anymore than the fanboys want to drag it on. The problem is Trump. Not Kelly.
Can I ask you a similar question? "Bimbo" brought up what Trump had said on a TV show where he was famous for being hard on contestants. Why would you accept this form of information and deny that the "bimbo" video had any relevance to a double standard by bimbo?
Hypocrite.
It should be quite evident but I will say it again...because Trump is the one running for president. Not Kelly. And no, his remarks have not only been on his show and that wasn't the question.
8. Erik Larson is a sleazy. He dis-invited Carson because he is racist. He made up a silly excuse to dump him and even lied about him. Fiorina will give you a headache. She talks in circles. She wasn't a very good head of HP. She ran the company into the ground. Something you morons want to point at in Trump but ignore in everyone else.
And if he really is so sleazy ehy was Trump going to appear anyway? Fiorini was fired from HP...but didn't take it into bankruptcy. Even once. ;D
9. Good grief. Why don't you smoke another crack pipe!!!!
Anything is better than what we have NOW!!! You've lived with it for almost 8 years. 8 years of lies. I suppose you're glad when politicians lie to you?
For the record. Trump was rather smart to use the "bimbo" term in reference to "Kelly".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bimbo
Fox definitely uses her as "eye candy" for the news. Just like it uses Kimberly and others. Bimbo fits rather well.
I believe Kelly is a very attractive lady. Some think Guilfoyle is. What you of course ignored is that Kelly was a corporate lawyer for a fortune 500 company for 9 years. You don't get that just by being pretty. Guilfoyle is also a lawyer, graduating magna cum laude from UC Davis and was an Assistant District Attorney in both LA and San Francisco.
