A little over-produced, but very informative, except for the Dispensational Zionism plugged at the conclusion.
The Antediluvian climate, giantism, and longevity.
The Antediluvian climate, giantism, and longevity.
The Ark and the Darkness: some interesting highlights
- Thread starter Ekklesian
- Start date
The engineering, capacity, and stability of the Ark
The scope of the Flood.
Where did all the water come from, where it went, and the supercontinent.
Coexistence of dinosaurs with 'modern' animals and dinosaur soft tissue
Common human history, the striking similarities that dissappear after the scattering from Babel.
In response to the recent Noah's Ark thread suggesting the Durupinar geological formation as a possible remnants...
It isn't. It's just remnants of a mudflow. Plus the ratios are all wrong. The Ark wasn't a boat, per se. It was box designed to ride out the storm.
For more information on the investigations performed:
It isn't. It's just remnants of a mudflow. Plus the ratios are all wrong. The Ark wasn't a boat, per se. It was box designed to ride out the storm.
For more information on the investigations performed:
True/False?
Radar shows man-made (boat) structure……….FALSE
There is a regular metallic pattern…………FALSE
Lab tests show petrified laminated wood……..FALSE
Turkish scientists found metal rods…………FALSE
Metal artefacts have been proved by lab……..FALSE
There are ‘ship’s ribs’ showing…………….FALSE
There is lots of petrified wood…………….FALSE
Turkish Commission says ‘it’s a boat………..FALSE
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2019
- Messages
- 1,621
- Reaction score
- 709
- Points
- 113
Creation Ministries International has a lengthy article rebutting the claims that Noah's Ark has been found at the Durupinar site. There are actually a number of these boat-shaped formations - so did Noah command an entire fleet?
"This particular boat shape is far from unique. The Turkish Air Force released another photograph (click here to see picture) several years ago showing three similar boat shapes in the mudflow material on the footslopes of nearby Lesser Mount Ararat."
This "discovery" is a fraud perpetrated by the notorious fake "archaeologist" Ron Wyatt:
"Geophysicist Tom Fenner says, 'I was surprised and dismayed to learn that Mr Wyatt was using my name as well as the name of Geophysical Survey Systems Inc. (GSSI) in order to lend credibility to his unsubstantiated claims concerning the so-called "Noah’s Ark site".' Fenner goes on to indicate that neither he nor GSSI believes the formation to be man-made. . . .
"Could Ron Wyatt have found and solved problems that have baffled professional archaeologists for more than a century, or is there another explanation? Ron invariably has an ‘explanation’ of why he can’t direct others to see all this hard evidence for themselves at these ‘sites’. His occasional seemingly convincing ‘documentation’ (including video tape) repeatedly withers under independent scrutiny and/or conflicts with the on-site eye-witness testimony of several of his co-expeditionaries."
[Edit - I just realized this article is the same one previously posted by Ekklesian on September 1. So now you can read it twice.]
"This particular boat shape is far from unique. The Turkish Air Force released another photograph (click here to see picture) several years ago showing three similar boat shapes in the mudflow material on the footslopes of nearby Lesser Mount Ararat."
This "discovery" is a fraud perpetrated by the notorious fake "archaeologist" Ron Wyatt:
"Geophysicist Tom Fenner says, 'I was surprised and dismayed to learn that Mr Wyatt was using my name as well as the name of Geophysical Survey Systems Inc. (GSSI) in order to lend credibility to his unsubstantiated claims concerning the so-called "Noah’s Ark site".' Fenner goes on to indicate that neither he nor GSSI believes the formation to be man-made. . . .
"Could Ron Wyatt have found and solved problems that have baffled professional archaeologists for more than a century, or is there another explanation? Ron invariably has an ‘explanation’ of why he can’t direct others to see all this hard evidence for themselves at these ‘sites’. His occasional seemingly convincing ‘documentation’ (including video tape) repeatedly withers under independent scrutiny and/or conflicts with the on-site eye-witness testimony of several of his co-expeditionaries."
[Edit - I just realized this article is the same one previously posted by Ekklesian on September 1. So now you can read it twice.]
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Messages
- 11,037
- Reaction score
- 2,606
- Points
- 113
Joooooosssssssssssssssss!