The canon was closed with Deuteronomy

praise_yeshua said:
I'll take that as a compliment. I'll start a few more threads about Revelation and we'll see if you can keep up.

Every argument you have presented on this thread has been decimated. I think you need to define "keep up" because it is not how Webster defined it!
 
FSSL said:
Okay. You should host the show "PY is smarter than the Theologians" I will watch it :D

I notice you're not attending.... that might say something. :)

Hmm.... now that is an interesting conundrum!

The text of Revelation. Not particularly Rev 22:19.

Bwahahahahaha!!!!

THAT is helpful. Start a thread called "PY's Dictionary" and then we can all be on the same page.

Since Metzger defined the system related to the grading and dating of mss, I think I will use his definitions/usages of the terms, not yours.

Sure he did..... Too bad all those that labored before him........ didn't have anything to say about it. Metzger didn't die until 2007. You're so in love with modern scholarship that you fail to realize its weaknesses. It "PRETENDS" to be something its not. Metzger's method isn't canonical. Its an opinion. Nothing more. Nothing less.
 
FSSL said:
praise_yeshua said:
I'll take that as a compliment. I'll start a few more threads about Revelation and we'll see if you can keep up.

Every argument you have presented on this thread has been decimated. I think you need to define "keep up" because it is not how Webster defined it!

Sure it has. That's why you have so many people praising you for "putting me in my place...."
 
praise_yeshua said:
No one in their right mind believes "John the Beloved" lived to 95 AD.

Law of Yeezy #1: Yeezy is never wrong. Ever.
Corollary #1: Anyone who contradicts What Yeezy Thinks is not merely wrong, but morally and/or intellectually deficient.
 
praise_yeshua said:
Sure it has. That's why you have so many people praising you for "putting me in my place...."

What does the word "praise" mean according to PY?

I don't use the praise of others to validate the effectiveness of my posts. I rely on the placing forth of facts that have soundly refuted your assumptions and errors.

The lack of participation by others may be thread fatigue.
 
FSSL: You have ZERO conflicting mss evidence for Rev 22.19.

PY: You have only LATE texts to examine and evidence of corruption early. Don't ignore the evidence.

FSSL: PY has provided zero evidence and uses his own definition for "late." What a canard!!
 
FSSL said:
FSSL: You have ZERO conflicting mss evidence for Rev 22.19.

PY: You have only LATE texts to examine and evidence of corruption early. Don't ignore the evidence.

FSSL: PY has provided zero evidence and uses his own definition for "late." What a canard!!

Do you feel better now?

You sound like Ted Cruz trying to explain why he didn't know he was a Canadian citizen till 18 months ago.
 
Feel better? Nah. Are you imitating Hillary's coughing fit to escape an answer?
 
FSSL said:
Feel better? Nah. Are you imitating Hillary's coughing fit to escape an answer?

Whenever Yeezy posts one of his factoids, Hillary barks like a dog.
 
FSSL said:
Feel better? Nah. Are you imitating Hillary's coughing fit to escape an answer?

Nah.... I've already answered you. You just refuse to acknowledge it.

There are multiple reasons to be the text of Revelation has been altered from its original form.
 
Ransom said:
FSSL said:
Feel better? Nah. Are you imitating Hillary's coughing fit to escape an answer?

Whenever Yeezy posts one of his factoids, Hillary barks like a dog.

I wish it worked that way. I'd "start" posting away...

While, I can't make Hilary bark... I sure can make you howl.
 
Back
Top