The Comments Tell The Tale

subllibrm said:
Interesting. Gal would be on par with “tranny”? That’s a new one for me. Thanks for the heads up.

Now that we have that out of the way do you have an example of Jesus denigrating the people He was seeking to reach?
Click to expand...
both terms are denigrating to specific groups of people.. ... and that should make them wrong according to your previous logic.... . there is no "on par" measurement to it..... ... ...do you think it only matters if it affects people in your own little circle or limited distance of sight?..... .... or are you trying to tell us it was ok to call them "gals" because they are not the kind of people you are trying to reach?.....

when you said people in other places had called you a bigot i honestly wasn;t sure why.... ... but now i know very well why... ... thanks for getting that out of the way....
 
Last edited:
subllibrm said:
The video is the avenue to the comments. The point I made (as noted in the thread title) is regarding the comments about the video. I figured that folks here could read them for themselves. I can copy and paste some but I have a feeling that I would be accused of cherry picking.
Click to expand...
nah..... just leave it as it is..... you are probably more comfortable making wild accusations while providing obscure and vague evidence anyway..... :rolleyes: .. seems to fit your style....

however... . if if was able to see the entire video or read the full transcript it;s very likely that considering what i have seen so far i would agree with you.... but first impressions of videos are frequently wrong - and i am not going to be lectured or conndemned over an issue when i can;t even see what the lecturer is really talking about.... ..especially by the likes of you....

i was never a member of an ifb church and never attended a fundamental baptist "kawledge" either... . so that kind of condescending - generalized guilt trip and control tactic doesn;t work on me....
 
Last edited:
subllibrm said:
That is a specific response to a specific person about a specific statement that they made.
Click to expand...
i know what you intended it to be.... .. but what you claimed you made in the third sentence is not what you posted in the first one.. ...... did you even look back at it to see?..... or did you just snap into another knee jerk reaction?.....

you want to lecture everyone here on manners - tone - and tactics....while demonstrating that yours are no better... and... in fact... yours have become much worse since you first started all this.... .... the fact you can;t see it in yourself but are more than happy to point it out in everyone else here speaks volumes about who and what you are..... anonymous or not.....
 
Last edited:
subllibrm said:
Then you should have no problem citing Him calling the people pejoratives rather than calling them to repentance.
Click to expand...
But your point was that our alleged lack of civility was the cause of their hate. So again, what wrong things did Jesus do and say that made Him so hated?
 
subllibrm said:
1. While true it is not an excuse. Maybe you should avoid politics if you’re not able to participate with Spirit led self control.

2. They will answer for their actions.

I have not said otherwise about myself. Note the use of “we” above rather than “you”.

Basically you are agreeing with me.
Click to expand...

The more I read of your posts, the more I agree with you about yourself.
You and you alone are standing for truth, virtue, morality and decency.

Hallelujah!
 
AverageJoe said:
Nobody has stated he had done anything wrong. That would be heresy. We know Christ was perfect. Stop trying to play devils advocate, and just admit, you're the son of the devil! We'll accept that admission. LOL
Click to expand...
You kind of missed the point there Joe old buddy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top