Many women reject Jesus as messiah. If they accepted Him they wouldn't be women.The Jews reject Jesus as messiah. If they accepted Him they wouldn't be Jews.
Textbook replacement philosophy.The Jews reject Jesus as messiah. If they accepted Him they wouldn't be Jews.
Many women reject Jesus as messiah. If they accepted Him they wouldn't be women.
For some it is.Being a woman is a religion?
For some it is.
I think biscuit was taking sub's ludicrous statement to it's logical conclusion by making a ludicrous statement. At least that's how I read it.
Almost half the Jews in the nation of Israel are non-religious, secular. There are literally thousands of Jews in every field known to man that excel far beyond what they should since the Jews as a group make up less than 1% of the world’s population. Instead of ridiculing them remember it is only by the grace of God that your eyes have not been blinded and you are not on your way to hell. Some time in the future their eyes will be opened to the truth of who Jesus is. To take Galations 3:28 to prove we are all non-binary is to pervert the text.Being a woman is a religion?
The Muslims reject Jesus as messiah. If they accepted Him they wouldn't be Muslims.The Jews reject Jesus as messiah. If they accepted Him they wouldn't be Jews.
Almost half the Jews in the nation of Israel are non-religious, secular.
If a Chinaman accepted Jesus he would still be a Chinaman.The Muslims reject Jesus as messiah. If they accepted Him they wouldn't be Muslims.
Buddhists reject Jesus as messiah. If they accepted him they wouldn't be Buddhists.
Hindus reject Jesus as messiah. If they accepted Him they wouldn't be Hindus.
The lost reject Jesus as messiah. If they accepted Him they wouldn't be lost.
If a Chinaman accepted Jesus he would still be a Chinaman.
Paul's epistle is to the Hebrews, not the Jews.If a Chinaman accepted Jesus he would still be a Chinaman.
If a European (White) accepted Jesus he would still be a European.
If an African (Black) accepted Jesus he would still be an African.
If an American Indian accepted Jesus he would still be an American Indian.
The apostle Paul was a Jew (Hebrew being the ethnic term) when he accepted Jesus and and he was still a Jew physically after he accepted Jesus. He didn’t quit being a Jew any more than a woman quit being a woman or a slave quit being a slave (Gal 3:28). He gave his credentials in Philippians 3:5 as being an “Hebrew of the Hebrews” and even told us what tribe he came from. In Romans 9:3 Paul was so concerned for his brethren “according to the flesh” that he was willing to go to hell in their place if that is what it would take for them to be saved. In 1 Corinthians 10:13 the apostle talks about the law of love and told the Corinthians to give no offense to the Gentiles, neither to the Jews, nor to the Church of God. Everyone who is saved is part of the Church of God and they are one spiritually but that doesn’t change the fact there are differences.
There is nothing wrong for a Black man honoring his heritage any more than it is wrong for a White man or a Chinaman or anyone else honoring his heritage. It only becomes sinful when one considers himself superior to other people because of racial pride. Acts 17:26 says “God made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation.” All men are equal in the sight of God (spiritually) since all came from one man, Adam. The Greeks believed all non-Greeks were barbarians and this was a blow to their national pride. A Jew may be a Jew outwardly (physically) but according to Romans 2:28- 29 he is not a true Jew (inwardly) until be believes the gospel and becomes a member of the Church of God.
Here's a question for you...If a Chinaman accepted Jesus he would still be a Chinaman.
If a European (White) accepted Jesus he would still be a European.
If an African (Black) accepted Jesus he would still be an African.
If an American Indian accepted Jesus he would still be an American Indian.
The apostle Paul was a Jew (Hebrew being the ethnic term) when he accepted Jesus and and he was still a Jew physically after he accepted Jesus. He didn’t quit being a Jew any more than a woman quit being a woman or a slave quit being a slave (Gal 3:28). He gave his credentials in Philippians 3:5 as being an “Hebrew of the Hebrews” and even told us what tribe he came from. In Romans 9:3 Paul was so concerned for his brethren “according to the flesh” that he was willing to go to hell in their place if that is what it would take for them to be saved. In 1 Corinthians 10:13 the apostle talks about the law of love and told the Corinthians to give no offense to the Gentiles, neither to the Jews, nor to the Church of God. Everyone who is saved is part of the Church of God and they are one spiritually but that doesn’t change the fact there are differences.
There is nothing wrong for a Black man honoring his heritage any more than it is wrong for a White man or a Chinaman or anyone else honoring his heritage. It only becomes sinful when one considers himself superior to other people because of racial pride. Acts 17:26 says “God made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation.” All men are equal in the sight of God (spiritually) since all came from one man, Adam. The Greeks believed all non-Greeks were barbarians and this was a blow to their national pride. A Jew may be a Jew outwardly (physically) but according to Romans 2:28- 29 he is not a true Jew (inwardly) until be believes the gospel and becomes a member of the Church of God.
Hey, @biscuit1953 , at least you make an attempt to support your position. I know where you're coming from, having spent some time in the Premillennial camp. You're not far from the light. I have high hopes you'll see it soon.Since you continue to confuse religion and ethnicity even after being corrected, your opinion is worthless and disregarded.
I’ve always noted that those who lose an argument on the merits resort to name calling.Hey, @biscuit1953 , at least you make an attempt to support your position. I know where you're coming from, having spent some time in the Premillennial camp. You're not far from the light. I have high hopes you'll see it soon.
I'm afraid @saphead...er, I mean,... @Tarheel Baptist is quite beyond hope, ignorantly belching and farting his Israeli nationalism thinking it rises as a sweet savor to the very nostrils of Gawd!![]()
You're suggesting you've engaged an argument?I’ve always noted that those who lose an argument on the merits resort to name calling.
![]()
Oh! The irony!LOL. He won't be confused with the facts. He KNOWS what he believes!