The straw that MAY break the camels back.

Bruh

Active member
Doctor
Elect
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
3,069
Reaction score
17
Points
38
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/01/21/make-no-mistake-rush-limbaugh-on-why-he-thinks-establishment-types-have-come-out-for-trump/


Straight up! Whoever the establishment is for I'm against, seriously!

I really don't know, now?
 
The more I read the more I'm shifting to Cruz.

Here's what I don't understand.

It's like this.

I work for a company for 10 years I hate the owner. Come Monday I got a job promised to me for the next 20 years making $180,000 a year from someone else.

So when the boss comes in Friday I tell him everything I couldn't for the last 10 years and how much I hate him and this company and I let him have it for 45 minutes and he says I'll give you $220,000. What I'm saying is, this doesn't happen.

Trump has been calling out the GOP for how many months? And now for some reason they love him?

Something is going on.
 
Bruh said:
The more I read the more I'm shifting to Cruz.

Here's what I don't understand.

It's like this.

I work for a company for 10 years I hate the owner. Come Monday I got a job promised to me for the next 20 years making $180,000 a year from someone else.

So when the boss comes in Friday I tell him everything I couldn't for the last 10 years and how much I hate him and this company and I let him have it for 45 minutes and he says I'll give you $220,000. What I'm saying is, this doesn't happen.

Trump has been calling out the GOP for how many months? And now for some reason they love him?

Something is going on.

Rush is wrong. It's about the nominee. Trump is clearly going to win. They know it. Cruz doesn't have a chance. They have to coalesce around Trump or they are going to lose the party altogether.

I know some conservative are refusing to acknowledge that Ted is a shady character but he is. If Ted gets the nonmination no conservative can honesty keep a straight face and be a constitutional originalist.

Cruz will say and dos anything to get ahead. Yeah we really need another first term senator from a constitutional lawyer background. Yeah... right.
 
If Cruz will say anything to get ahead, why didn't he back subsidies for ethanol, so he could get more Iowa votes?
 
The Rogue Tomato said:
If Cruz will say anything to get ahead, why didn't he back subsidies for ethanol, so he could get more Iowa votes?

He's support by the oil industry. He's rather lose in Iowa than lose his long term support.

He's bought and paid for just like every other politican running. He's owned by special interests.
 
praise_yeshua said:
The Rogue Tomato said:
If Cruz will say anything to get ahead, why didn't he back subsidies for ethanol, so he could get more Iowa votes?

He's support by the oil industry. He's rather lose in Iowa than lose his long term support.

He's bought and paid for just like every other politican running. He's owned by special interests.

I'm in the oil field if he's bought by them, more power to him.

There's a lot of people starving down here right now because the barrel is like $32 right now.
 
Bruh said:
The more I read the more I'm shifting to Cruz.

Here's what I don't understand.

It's like this.

I work for a company for 10 years I hate the owner. Come Monday I got a job promised to me for the next 20 years making $180,000 a year from someone else.

So when the boss comes in Friday I tell him everything I couldn't for the last 10 years and how much I hate him and this company and I let him have it for 45 minutes and he says I'll give you $220,000. What I'm saying is, this doesn't happen.

Trump has been calling out the GOP for how many months? And now for some reason they love him?

Something is going on.
You're wrong.

I told a company something similar:

The Boss I disliked offered me a raise that went back 6 months, a few perks, and etc.
He thought it was a ploy, and he was willing to deal to keep me.

I left anyway, and was paid the back raise anyway, in the form of another month's salary.
In that month, a National Co. bought our Co., and the stock I had been given, as a perk, split.
They held it for the rest of the calendar year, and it doubled.

I was paid 4 times the original stock's worth, 4 times, that is 16 times the original perk.

So, no, you're wrong, if you're valuable, and you voice your frustration in the way out, it is very reasonable to expect the Co to counter.

Earnestly Contend

 
prophet said:
Bruh said:
The more I read the more I'm shifting to Cruz.

Here's what I don't understand.

It's like this.

I work for a company for 10 years I hate the owner. Come Monday I got a job promised to me for the next 20 years making $180,000 a year from someone else.

So when the boss comes in Friday I tell him everything I couldn't for the last 10 years and how much I hate him and this company and I let him have it for 45 minutes and he says I'll give you $220,000. What I'm saying is, this doesn't happen.

Trump has been calling out the GOP for how many months? And now for some reason they love him?

Something is going on.
You're wrong.

I told a company something similar:

The Boss I disliked offered me a raise that went back 6 months, a few perks, and etc.
He thought it was a ploy, and he was willing to deal to keep me.

I left anyway, and was paid the back raise anyway, in the form of another month's salary.
In that month, a National Co. bought our Co., and the stock I had been given, as a perk, split.
They held it for the rest of the calendar year, and it doubled.

I was paid 4 times the original stock's worth, 4 times, that is 16 times the original perk.

So, no, you're wrong, if you're valuable, and you voice your frustration in the way out, it is very reasonable to expect the Co to counter.

Earnestly Contend

I get what you're saying but I was using that as an illustration.

Trumps been calling everyone of them out for how many months? And the ESTABLISHMENT so say like him? No!

They know he's a deal maker and that's not what we need we need someone that's gonna say no it's my way or the highway.
 
Bruh said:
prophet said:
Bruh said:
The more I read the more I'm shifting to Cruz.

Here's what I don't understand.

It's like this.

I work for a company for 10 years I hate the owner. Come Monday I got a job promised to me for the next 20 years making $180,000 a year from someone else.

So when the boss comes in Friday I tell him everything I couldn't for the last 10 years and how much I hate him and this company and I let him have it for 45 minutes and he says I'll give you $220,000. What I'm saying is, this doesn't happen.

Trump has been calling out the GOP for how many months? And now for some reason they love him?

Something is going on.
You're wrong.

I told a company something similar:

The Boss I disliked offered me a raise that went back 6 months, a few perks, and etc.
He thought it was a ploy, and he was willing to deal to keep me.

I left anyway, and was paid the back raise anyway, in the form of another month's salary.
In that month, a National Co. bought our Co., and the stock I had been given, as a perk, split.
They held it for the rest of the calendar year, and it doubled.

I was paid 4 times the original stock's worth, 4 times, that is 16 times the original perk.

So, no, you're wrong, if you're valuable, and you voice your frustration in the way out, it is very reasonable to expect the Co to counter.

Earnestly Contend

I get what you're saying but I was using that as an illustration.

Trumps been calling everyone of them out for how many months? And the ESTABLISHMENT so say like him? No!

They know he's a deal maker and that's not what we need we need someone that's gonna say no it's my way or the highway.
We've had that for 7 years...

Earnestly Contend

 
Bruh said:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/01/21/make-no-mistake-rush-limbaugh-on-why-he-thinks-establishment-types-have-come-out-for-trump/


Straight up! Whoever the establishment is for I'm against, seriously!

I really don't know, now?
Your premise is wrong from the start.  Glenn Beck is for open borders as much as Barack Obama is as is the rest of the Republican establishment.  Trump didn't bring us Obamacare.  President Obama did and the newly elected Republican majority supports it.  Open borders didn't start with President Obama.  It has been going on for years and President Bush did nothing to stop it while encouraging more of it.  After the 2014 election all hopes were dashed when it came to turning the country in a different direction with John Boehner and later Paul Ryan giving President Obama everything he wants on a silver platter. 

In short, many Americans have decided that a loose canon is better than continuing down the yellow brick road of electing Republican politicians when the facts show there is little difference between them and the socialist Democrats.  Even though I like Ted Cruz, most of his Christian values aren't accepted by the majority in this country and the hatred shown to him by the Republican establishment is no surprise at all but the hatred he is receiving is nothing  compared to that which Donald Trump is getting.  It is the selective outrage that National Review spews out that will only increase support for Trump and rightly so. 

Here is the hyprocisy that explains why many Americans are fed up with anything that has to do with the Republican establishment.  National Review which is the poster child of the "establishment" comes out with a desperation issue condemning Trump while rallying behind Paul Ryan. 
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/22/selective-outrage-national-review-trashes-trump-rallies-behind-ryan/

?I think that we need to respect the will of the majority. Republicans ought to be a grassroots party. And the grassroots certainly agree with Donald Trump on most issues, but certainly on the immigration issue? I certainly think he represents everything the grassroots want.? Phyllis Schlafly
 
The link doens't work right.

Trump Spokeswoman: Malcolm X Is ?My Idol,? Republicans Are Racist

Since joining the Trump campaign as a national spokeswoman in November, Katrina Pierson has served as an attack dog of sorts for Donald Trump, attempting to expose his critics and opponents as faux conservatives who are simply pulling the wool over the eyes of the American people.

And yet, Ms. Pierson?s own statements reveal she is a self-proclaimed devotee of Malcolm X (whom she has referred to as her ?idol?) and has a history of attacking conservatives as racists, sneering at Christians who are unable to ?handle the truth? and mocking candidates who open up about their faith on the campaign trail as preachers who would be ?great if we were electing a Jesus.?

Pierson points to Malcolm X as a large source of her ideological founding, much like the leaders of Black Lives Matter do. Pierson has called the radical figure a hero and is open about her literal idolization of him, explaining that ?MLK was too moderate for me.?

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/22/trump-spox-malcolm-x-is-my-idol-republicans-are-racist/
 
Bruh said:
praise_yeshua said:
The Rogue Tomato said:
If Cruz will say anything to get ahead, why didn't he back subsidies for ethanol, so he could get more Iowa votes?

He's support by the oil industry. He's rather lose in Iowa than lose his long term support.

He's bought and paid for just like every other politican running. He's owned by special interests.

I'm in the oil field if he's bought by them, more power to him.

There's a lot of people starving down here right now because the barrel is like $32 right now.

Blame Saudi Arabia.

They hate Iran and Russia. Their refusal to lower production is the single reason for low oil prices.

Not to hurt your feelings.... But your company should have saved all that money they were making when oil was over 100 a barrel.
 
Top