Trump Believes Putin over US Intelligence Community

LongGone

Active member
Elect
Joined
Oct 15, 2014
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
3
Points
38
Age
67
Location
Winchester, Kentucky
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/11/trump-believe-putin-when-told-me-face-to-face-didnt-meddle-in-elections.html

To me that is a strange one.
 
Maybe because they produce reports like this one.
If this was the best they could do I don't believe them either.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/11/11/the-actual-2016-fbi-report-on-russian-hacking-does-not-show-what-media-claim-it-does/

link to document.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

injustice-league.jpg
 
bgwilkinson said:
Maybe because they produce reports like this one.
If this was the best they could do I don't believe them either.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/11/11/the-actual-2016-fbi-report-on-russian-hacking-does-not-show-what-media-claim-it-does/

link to document.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

injustice-league.jpg

You do realize that Conservative Tree House is not a real news agency. It deliberately has fabricated content to fool readers and subsequently made viral through the internet to crowds that increase dissemnation.
 
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
Maybe because they produce reports like this one.
If this was the best they could do I don't believe them either.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/11/11/the-actual-2016-fbi-report-on-russian-hacking-does-not-show-what-media-claim-it-does/

link to document.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

injustice-league.jpg

You do realize that Conservative Tree House is not a real news agency. It deliberately has fabricated content to fool readers and subsequently made viral through the internet to crowds that increase dissemination.

Am I to understand that you did not read this document from the US government?
You apparently believe it is a fake and has been fabricated by TCTH.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016
 
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
Maybe because they produce reports like this one.
If this was the best they could do I don't believe them either.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/11/11/the-actual-2016-fbi-report-on-russian-hacking-does-not-show-what-media-claim-it-does/

link to document.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

injustice-league.jpg

You do realize that Conservative Tree House is not a real news agency. It deliberately has fabricated content to fool readers and subsequently made viral through the internet to crowds that increase dissemination.

Am I to understand that you did not read this document from the US government?
You apparently believe it is a fake and has been fabricated by TCTH.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

I read the document. I do find it hard to believe anyone remotely wanting to know truth would be using the The Conservative Tree House. The summary of the report is that it gave technical details regarding methods used by Russian intelligence services for affecting the US election. This report is not the only evidence that our intelligence agencies have produced some classified and some is not.

The leaders of our intelligence agencies believe that Russian interfered. It does not matter what the Conservative Tree House states, it matters not what the value you place on this report the truth is that it is ridiculous for the President of the United States to believe Putin at face value over our own Intelligence Agencies. The fact that he is now backing away from these statement further validates the ridiculousness of these statements.
 
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
Maybe because they produce reports like this one.
If this was the best they could do I don't believe them either.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/11/11/the-actual-2016-fbi-report-on-russian-hacking-does-not-show-what-media-claim-it-does/

link to document.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

injustice-league.jpg

You do realize that Conservative Tree House is not a real news agency. It deliberately has fabricated content to fool readers and subsequently made viral through the internet to crowds that increase dissemination.

Am I to understand that you did not read this document from the US government?
You apparently believe it is a fake and has been fabricated by TCTH.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

I read the document. I do find it hard to believe anyone remotely wanting to know truth would be using the The Conservative Tree House. The summary of the report is that it gave technical details regarding methods used by Russian intelligence services for affecting the US election. This report is not the only evidence that our intelligence agencies have produced some classified and some is not.

The leaders of our intelligence agencies believe that Russian interfered. It does not matter what the Conservative Tree House states, it matters not what the value you place on this report the truth is that it is ridiculous for the President of the United States to believe Putin at face value over our own Intelligence Agencies. The fact that he is now backing away from these statement further validates the ridiculousness of these statements.

You have every right to your opinion as I have to mine.
You might be wrong and I might be wrong.
 
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
Maybe because they produce reports like this one.
If this was the best they could do I don't believe them either.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/11/11/the-actual-2016-fbi-report-on-russian-hacking-does-not-show-what-media-claim-it-does/

link to document.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

injustice-league.jpg

You do realize that Conservative Tree House is not a real news agency. It deliberately has fabricated content to fool readers and subsequently made viral through the internet to crowds that increase dissemination.

Am I to understand that you did not read this document from the US government?
You apparently believe it is a fake and has been fabricated by TCTH.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

I read the document. I do find it hard to believe anyone remotely wanting to know truth would be using the The Conservative Tree House. The summary of the report is that it gave technical details regarding methods used by Russian intelligence services for affecting the US election. This report is not the only evidence that our intelligence agencies have produced some classified and some is not.

The leaders of our intelligence agencies believe that Russian interfered. It does not matter what the Conservative Tree House states, it matters not what the value you place on this report the truth is that it is ridiculous for the President of the United States to believe Putin at face value over our own Intelligence Agencies. The fact that he is now backing away from these statement further validates the ridiculousness of these statements.

You have every right to your opinion as I have to mine.
You might be wrong and I might be wrong.

Yes we can disagree and in the end both be partially right and partially wrong even. Do you honestly believe that Trump did what was best for the USA when he publicly stated he believed Putin over the US Intelligence Community?  Was this a prudent and logical way to respond?
 
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
Maybe because they produce reports like this one.
If this was the best they could do I don't believe them either.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/11/11/the-actual-2016-fbi-report-on-russian-hacking-does-not-show-what-media-claim-it-does/

link to document.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

injustice-league.jpg

You do realize that Conservative Tree House is not a real news agency. It deliberately has fabricated content to fool readers and subsequently made viral through the internet to crowds that increase dissemination.

Am I to understand that you did not read this document from the US government?
You apparently believe it is a fake and has been fabricated by TCTH.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

I read the document. I do find it hard to believe anyone remotely wanting to know truth would be using the The Conservative Tree House. The summary of the report is that it gave technical details regarding methods used by Russian intelligence services for affecting the US election. This report is not the only evidence that our intelligence agencies have produced some classified and some is not.

The leaders of our intelligence agencies believe that Russian interfered. It does not matter what the Conservative Tree House states, it matters not what the value you place on this report the truth is that it is ridiculous for the President of the United States to believe Putin at face value over our own Intelligence Agencies. The fact that he is now backing away from these statement further validates the ridiculousness of these statements.

You have every right to your opinion as I have to mine.
You might be wrong and I might be wrong.

Yes we can disagree and in the end both be partially right and partially wrong even. Do you honestly believe that Trump did what was best for the USA when he publicly stated he believed Putin over the US Intelligence Community?  Was this a prudent and logical way to respond?

I take it that you have not heard Trump speak all of the times that are publicly available but rather depend on the media?s interpretation and analyses of what he said. I guess I can understand your view if that is where you get your information.
 
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
Maybe because they produce reports like this one.
If this was the best they could do I don't believe them either.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/11/11/the-actual-2016-fbi-report-on-russian-hacking-does-not-show-what-media-claim-it-does/

link to document.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

injustice-league.jpg

You do realize that Conservative Tree House is not a real news agency. It deliberately has fabricated content to fool readers and subsequently made viral through the internet to crowds that increase dissemination.

Am I to understand that you did not read this document from the US government?
You apparently believe it is a fake and has been fabricated by TCTH.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

I read the document. I do find it hard to believe anyone remotely wanting to know truth would be using the The Conservative Tree House. The summary of the report is that it gave technical details regarding methods used by Russian intelligence services for affecting the US election. This report is not the only evidence that our intelligence agencies have produced some classified and some is not.

The leaders of our intelligence agencies believe that Russian interfered. It does not matter what the Conservative Tree House states, it matters not what the value you place on this report the truth is that it is ridiculous for the President of the United States to believe Putin at face value over our own Intelligence Agencies. The fact that he is now backing away from these statement further validates the ridiculousness of these statements.

You have every right to your opinion as I have to mine.
You might be wrong and I might be wrong.

Yes we can disagree and in the end both be partially right and partially wrong even. Do you honestly believe that Trump did what was best for the USA when he publicly stated he believed Putin over the US Intelligence Community?  Was this a prudent and logical way to respond?

I take it that you have not heard Trump speak all of the times that are publicly available but rather depend on the media?s interpretation and analyses of what he said. I guess I can understand your view if that is where you get your information.

Your take would be wrong.  Why make an assumption of where I get my information rather than answering the question?
 
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
Maybe because they produce reports like this one.
If this was the best they could do I don't believe them either.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/11/11/the-actual-2016-fbi-report-on-russian-hacking-does-not-show-what-media-claim-it-does/

link to document.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

injustice-league.jpg

You do realize that Conservative Tree House is not a real news agency. It deliberately has fabricated content to fool readers and subsequently made viral through the internet to crowds that increase dissemination.

Am I to understand that you did not read this document from the US government?
You apparently believe it is a fake and has been fabricated by TCTH.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

I read the document. I do find it hard to believe anyone remotely wanting to know truth would be using the The Conservative Tree House. The summary of the report is that it gave technical details regarding methods used by Russian intelligence services for affecting the US election. This report is not the only evidence that our intelligence agencies have produced some classified and some is not.

The leaders of our intelligence agencies believe that Russian interfered. It does not matter what the Conservative Tree House states, it matters not what the value you place on this report the truth is that it is ridiculous for the President of the United States to believe Putin at face value over our own Intelligence Agencies. The fact that he is now backing away from these statement further validates the ridiculousness of these statements.

You have every right to your opinion as I have to mine.
You might be wrong and I might be wrong.

Yes we can disagree and in the end both be partially right and partially wrong even. Do you honestly believe that Trump did what was best for the USA when he publicly stated he believed Putin over the US Intelligence Community?  Was this a prudent and logical way to respond?

I take it that you have not heard Trump speak all of the times that are publicly available but rather depend on the media?s interpretation and analyses of what he said. I guess I can understand your view if that is where you get your information.

Your take would be wrong.  Why make an assumption of where I get my information rather than answering the question?

Yes, we can disagree and in the end both be partially right and partially wrong even. Do you honestly believe that Trump did what was best for the USA when he publicly stated he believed Putin over the US Intelligence Community?  Was this a prudent and logical way to respond?

Yes, it certainly was. It was completely in line with what he has been saying the last two years and especially in line with the things he said on the trip.
If you isolate one sound bite you are not getting the whole story. That is why I was doubting that you had heard him speak every time in the last 11 days.
 
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
LongGone said:
bgwilkinson said:
Maybe because they produce reports like this one.
If this was the best they could do I don't believe them either.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/11/11/the-actual-2016-fbi-report-on-russian-hacking-does-not-show-what-media-claim-it-does/

link to document.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

injustice-league.jpg

You do realize that Conservative Tree House is not a real news agency. It deliberately has fabricated content to fool readers and subsequently made viral through the internet to crowds that increase dissemination.

Am I to understand that you did not read this document from the US government?
You apparently believe it is a fake and has been fabricated by TCTH.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/335307016

I read the document. I do find it hard to believe anyone remotely wanting to know truth would be using the The Conservative Tree House. The summary of the report is that it gave technical details regarding methods used by Russian intelligence services for affecting the US election. This report is not the only evidence that our intelligence agencies have produced some classified and some is not.

The leaders of our intelligence agencies believe that Russian interfered. It does not matter what the Conservative Tree House states, it matters not what the value you place on this report the truth is that it is ridiculous for the President of the United States to believe Putin at face value over our own Intelligence Agencies. The fact that he is now backing away from these statement further validates the ridiculousness of these statements.

You have every right to your opinion as I have to mine.
You might be wrong and I might be wrong.

Yes we can disagree and in the end both be partially right and partially wrong even. Do you honestly believe that Trump did what was best for the USA when he publicly stated he believed Putin over the US Intelligence Community?  Was this a prudent and logical way to respond?

I take it that you have not heard Trump speak all of the times that are publicly available but rather depend on the media?s interpretation and analyses of what he said. I guess I can understand your view if that is where you get your information.

Your take would be wrong.  Why make an assumption of where I get my information rather than answering the question?

Yes, we can disagree and in the end both be partially right and partially wrong even. Do you honestly believe that Trump did what was best for the USA when he publicly stated he believed Putin over the US Intelligence Community?  Was this a prudent and logical way to respond?

Yes, it certainly was. It was completely in line with what he has been saying the last two years and especially in line with the things he said on the trip.
If you isolate one sound bite you are not getting the whole story. That is why I was doubting that you had heard him speak every time in the last 11 days.

I have no problem with us disagreeing. I do think it is lame that you keep barking up the tree that I am limiting this to one sound bite. Truth is that I am somewhat of a news junkie and am retired so I have time to devote to watching. IMHO opinion the President was wrong when he said he believed Putin over the US Intelligence Community is a good move by the President of the United States, calling US intelligence officials political hacks by name and calling investigations a Democratic hit job.  We have a President that have little control over his tongue/twitter and even if one agrees with his ideas he has not demonstrated the ability to lead people in the direction he desires to go.

I consider you one of the more knowledgeable posters on the forum when it comes to things FBCH. I was a student for 5 years so I do not have the insight that you have on that situation. Having said that I see so many correlations between the bullying and intimidation that Hyles used as Pastor and Trump uses as President. 
 
Top