Trump Defies SCOTUS

Tarheel Baptist said:
I’ll explain it to you…and I’ll type slowly.

Because Trump’s ego driven personality causes him to take any rebuff or disagreement personally and all of them require a response…usually noting that those disagreeing with him are dumb, stupid or idiotic. He can’t help himself.
Click to expand...
Downright presidential wouldn't you say? 😉
 
subllibrm said:
Downright presidential wouldn't you say? 😉
Click to expand...
With Trump, what you see is what you get. I prefer the billionaire playboy who punches back against the fraud of the Left to statesman who is all talk.

His transparency is a double-edged sword now that he's a wholesale Zionist, because it's waking the world and Christians worldwide to the crime of three centuries, Zionism and its demonic, murderous, counterfeit state.
 
subllibrm said:
I suppose it would be best to have a consistent steed of which you can always rely. 😉
Click to expand...
I’m honest about my feelings about Trump. He is what he is and always has been. And given the same choice tomorrow I’d still vote for him.

You on the other hand obviously dislike/hate him. Just be honest about it. And you just can’t abide anyone who doesn’t agree with you…hence your recurring nit picking here.

On that ^^^ I’m perfectly consistent.

Hallelujah and 😉
 
Ekklesian said:
With Trump, what you see is what you get. I prefer the billionaire playboy who punches back against the fraud of the Left to statesman who is all talk.

His transparency is a double-edged sword now that he's a wholesale Zionist, because it's waking the world and Christians worldwide to the crime of three centuries, Zionism and its demonic, murderous, counterfeit state.
Click to expand...
The Jooooos are to you what Trump is to Sub! And you can’t abide anyone who disagrees with your obviously brilliant take.

Brilliant was used with the highest degree of sarcasm I can muster.
 
Tarheel Baptist said:
I’m honest about my feelings about Trump. He is what he is and always has been. And given the same choice tomorrow I’d still vote for him.
Click to expand...
So would I, but that doesn’t mean I can’t call him out for some occasional criticism. “Baaa” silly sheep.
 
DrHuk&Duck said:
So would I, but that doesn’t mean I can’t call him out for some occasional criticism. “Baaa” silly sheep.
Click to expand...
I’m not sure anyone has objected to him being called out.

And I don’t know what baaa silly sheep means.
 
Tarheel Baptist said:
I’m not sure anyone has objected to him being called out.
Click to expand...
I don’t think so either, but there’s a big difference between not objecting “to him being called out” and actually calling him out. 😉

The sheep reference is in relation to the people who blindly follow the leftist or far right propaganda without the ability to step back and see another POV. They’re the people who, no matter what Trump says or does, constantly turn it into a sudden “but how about Biden” moment.
 
DrHuk&Duck said:
I don’t think so either, but there’s a big difference between not objecting “to him being called out” and actually calling him out. 😉

The sheep reference is in relation to the people who blindly follow the leftist or far right propaganda without the ability to step back and see another POV. They’re the people who, no matter what Trump says or does, constantly turn it into a sudden “but how about Biden” moment.
Click to expand...

I think we pretty much agree.
I might add to your sheep list those who, when Trump steps in it, ask for a MAGA response.
 
DrHuk&Duck said:
If it’s such an innocent light little pillow hit from SCOTUS to Trump, I wonder why Trump is having such a complete meltdown over it. 🧐🤔
Click to expand...
Because he’s not getting his way and he’s a big baby. Good look for a leader.
 
FSSL said:
There is no commonality with Biden and student loans... unless you can point to other acts Biden could have pivoted to
Click to expand...
Sub... can you point to other acts Biden could have pivoted to?
 
FSSL said:
Sub... can you point to other acts Biden could have pivoted to?
Click to expand...
He didn't pivot. He just kept making things up. Or rather the folks driving the auto pen. 😉
 
In the 1980s the Democratically controlled Congress (and the UAW) were demanding that Reagan impose tariffs but he adamantly refused, calling them "protectionism". My, how things have changed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top