Trump's News Ban from the White House...

[Ransom]

The government said it was an honest mistake. So we will go with that. Because they’ve demonstrated how open and honest they are.

When you think you have a point, you parrot other people's talking points.

When you cannot answer my arguments, you parrot (what you think are) my talking points.

Your concession of defeat is noted.

 

[Bruh]

When you think you have a point, you parrot other people's talking points.

When you cannot answer my arguments, you parrot (what you think are) my talking points.

Your concession of defeat is noted.

Nothing you say here has absolutely nothing to do with what I said. Stop changing the subject.

 

[Ransom]

Nothing you say here has absolutely nothing to do with what I said. Stop changing the subject.

Talk about parroting without understanding. Monkey-boy see, monkey-boy do.

I was, in fact, directly addressing what you said.

 

[Bruh]

Talk about parroting without understanding. Monkey-boy see, monkey-boy do.

I was, in fact, directly addressing what you said.

I said, The government said it was an honest mistake. So we will go with that. Because they’ve demonstrated how open and honest they are.

You said,
When you think you have a point, you parrot other people's talking points.

When you cannot answer my arguments, you parrot (what you think are) my talking points.

Your concession of defeat is noted.

I was talking about our government being honest.



Keep to the subject at hand.

 

[Ransom]

I said, The government said it was an honest mistake. So we will go with that. Because they’ve demonstrated how open and honest they are.

And I said,

When you think you have a point, you parrot other people's talking points.

When you cannot answer my arguments, you parrot (what you think are) my talking points.

Your concession of defeat is noted.

 

[ALAYMAN]

Also, I

i said at least no one died.
And you said, So you ain’t for ANY sort of strengthening of our national security, deaths or no? I thought you were America First? Seems like you’re more anti-Trump Pro-Nicky than anything else.

All because I said at least no one died this time. And you said all that.

Again, you and @Ransom accuse me of changing the subject and saying things that y’all didn’t say “if I do that” you definitely did it here.

You BOTH self project a lot.

I really do try to understand how you think and string arguments together, but sometimes it is almost impossible to make your word salads make sense.

 

[Bruh]

I really do try to understand how you think and string arguments together, but sometimes it is almost impossible to make your word salads make sense.

All I said was at least no one died this time.

And you said, So you ain’t for ANY sort of strengthening of our national security, deaths or
no? I thought you were America First? Seems like you’re more anti-Trump Pro-Nicky than anything else.

Now you make that make sense. How did you get all of that from “at least no one died this time”?

It’s sad you try and project yourself as this level headed educated Christian conservative yet you cannot and will not admit a simple wrong.

I won’t even try getting @Ransom to be honest that man cannot even keep a lady happy long enough to marry him.

 

[ALAYMAN]

All I said was at least no one died this time.

And you said, So you ain’t for ANY sort of strengthening of our national security, deaths or
no? I thought you were America First? Seems like you’re more anti-Trump Pro-Nicky than anything else.

Now you make that make sense. How did you get all of that from “at least no one died this time”?

It’s sad you try and project yourself as this level headed educated Christian conservative yet you cannot and will not admit a simple wrong.

I won’t even try getting @Ransom to be honest that man cannot even keep a lady happy long enough to marry him.

Ok, let’s keep it simple. In the context of our conversation, what did “All I said was at least no one died this time” mean?

 

[Bruh]

Ok, let’s keep it simple. In the context of our conversation, what did “All I said was at least no one died this time” mean?

Sub said in pist#3 The longer he's in office the more the predictions of his overreaching and overreaction seem to be coming true.

You said in post#5 Maybe a fair generalization, but Greenland got the message

Sub said in pist#6 America 1st imperialism at its finest

Then I said in post #9 At least no one was murdered……. This time

Then you said in post #10 So you ain’t for ANY sort of strengthening of our national security, deaths or no? I thought you were America First? Seems like you’re more anti-Trump Pro-Nicky than anything else.

This happens all the time with you and that basement dweller. You both ask me questions and your questions have nothing to do with what we’re talking about. But the good sport that am I answer the questions.

I go along with whatever the questions are (even though the question is completely changing the subject) and I’m some point I’m accused of changing the subject bec I don’t know what I’m talking about.

This is your chance to prove yourself to me to be an honest man. The other one? He’s lost no chance

 

[ALAYMAN]

Sub said in pist#3 The longer he's in office the more the predictions of his overreaching and overreaction seem to be coming true.

You said in post#5 Maybe a fair generalization, but Greenland got the message

Sub said in pist#6 America 1st imperialism at its finest

Then I said in post #9 At least no one was murdered……. This time

Then you said in post #10 So you ain’t for ANY sort of strengthening of our national security, deaths or no? I thought you were America First? Seems like you’re more anti-Trump Pro-Nicky than anything else.

This happens all the time with you and that basement dweller. You both ask me questions and your questions have nothing to do with what we’re talking about. But the good sport that am I answer the questions.

I go along with whatever the questions are (even though the question is completely changing the subject) and I’m some point I’m accused of changing the subject bec I don’t know what I’m talking about.

This is your chance to prove yourself to me to be an honest man. The other one? He’s lost no chance

I think you have a hard time following trains of thought and conversational context. But the first thing I would say is notice how you didn’t answer my question. Speaking of intellectual honesty, that is a common tactic of yours that has been observed by many people. I had simply asked you what you originally meant with your statement about nobody being killed. It’s a straightforward question. What did you mean when you said that? I’m giving you the chance to clear up any misunderstanding on my part. You never took the time to even answer the question, but rather launched into another senseless rambling mess of word salad.

But to deal with the total context of this thread and how you did not keep in line with it, but I was, what do you think the opening post was about? I’ll answer that question for you. Trump’s alleged overreach in his politics. So in the flow of that context of Trumps overreach, I made a joke about Greenland. The humor there is that people were talking in the news and social media about him overreaching in that scenario by threatening to invade that country. Well, in true Trumpian 4D Chess manner, his posturing managed to broker a historic agreement with Greenland, so that we have greater national security now, and Russia and China are kept away from encroaching upon our international interests in the sub-arctic region. All of that, and not one shot fired and nobody killed.

Now, insert yourself into the conversation, where you sarcastically talked about nobody having to be killed in this situation, presumably because you are against the death of our troops in Iran. I shot back at you as I asked a question about whether or not you ever felt like Trump did anything good in his seeking to strengthen our national interests, including keeping Iran from a nuclear weapon.

So the question again is, what did you mean (in the appropriate context of this conversation ) when you said “At least no one was murdered……. This time”?

 

[Bruh]

I think you have a hard time following trains of thought and conversational context. But the first thing I would say is notice how you didn’t answer my question. Speaking of intellectual honesty, that is a common tactic of yours that has been observed by many people. I had simply asked you what you originally meant with your statement about nobody being killed. It’s a straightforward question. What did you mean when you said that? I’m giving you the chance to clear up any misunderstanding on my part. You never took the time to even answer the question, but rather launched into another senseless rambling mess of word salad.

But to deal with the total context of this thread and how you did not keep in line with it, but I was, what do you think the opening post was about? I’ll answer that question for you. Trump’s alleged overreach in his politics. So in the flow of that context of Trumps overreach, I made a joke about Greenland. The humor there is that people were talking in the news and social media about him overreaching in that scenario by threatening to invade that country. Well, in true Trumpian 4D Chess manner, his posturing managed to broker a historic agreement with Greenland, so that we have greater national security now, and Russia and China are kept away from encroaching upon our international interests in the sub-arctic region. All of that, and not one shot fired and nobody killed.

Now, insert yourself into the conversation, where you sarcastically talked about nobody having to be killed in this situation, presumably because you are against the death of our troops in Iran. I shot back at you as I asked a question about whether or not you ever felt like Trump did anything good in his seeking to strengthen our national interests, including keeping Iran from a nuclear weapon.

So the question again is, what did you mean (in the appropriate context of this conversation ) when you said “At least no one was murdered……. This time”?

It’s that simple, no one died in this specific agreement with Greenland. I stayed within context and didn’t change anything. What is there not to understand? No one died this time. What I mean by that is, no one died this time.

This was actually your first comment after I said, at least no one died this time.

post #10 So you ain’t for ANY sort of strengthening of our national security, deaths or no? I thought you were America First? Seems like you’re more anti-Trump Pro-Nicky than anything else.

You didn’t ask me what it means till post #28. You changed the subject In post#10.

The way you ask me questions is the way CNN ask questions to Trump. I guess I should take it as a compliment.