T
.tim
Guest
Biblebeliever said:.tim said:I am not so certain the "KJV Only" stand he promotes is healthy. Naturally, you will defend your conviction - as you should - but, I am not so easily convinced. For one, the Bible is not a member of the trinity - yet people in your line of conviction seem to create a tetralogy line of thinking. This seems dangerous and not found in the Bible. His teachings on inspiration and preservation of the word are narrowly focused on a single translation of God's written word - a promise never made in scripture. I don't believe preservation is dependent on a single translation. Specially when that translation is the language of the ones promoting such a conviction. Maybe God preserved his word in Polish. What then?
Can God's preserved word be found in the Polish language today, or the Latin langauge? Or the French language? Sure it can.
God saw fit to mkae His word available in many languages on the Earth. But His perfect and inerrant word is found in the English language. And it is the Authorized King James Holy Bible.
But you have zero proof of that in the Authorized King James Holy Bible ... ZERO