Would you pastors object to being called "brother" instead?

The Rogue Tomato said:
T-Bone said:
FSSL said:
The Rogue Tomato said:
This time infinity.  People like FSSL, ALAYMAN, T-Bone, etc., shout with pride how they adhere to scriptural authority while picking and re-interpreting scriptures to fit their personal outlook on how things should be.  They give lip service to the authority of scripture in order to support their self-righteous pride, but scripture isn't their final authority at all.  The worst part of it all is that the way they interpret Paul contradicts the clear words of Christ, and somehow they think that's okay.

Wait a minute. Not one of us EVER says that Paul was lying about being an apostle. THAT is not a hermeneutical problem. That is a rejection of Paul's words altogether.

Hyperbole and false claims allows him to make his point...its okay, he does it to Paul, that's pretty good company.

1 Cor 15:9 For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.

Gotta agree with Paul on this point.  And so should you agree, who claim Paul's words are the very words of God.

So.... contrary to Paul......you deserve something?

No one deserves to be called an apostle. You don't deserve to be called "brother"..... Geesh...

Why are you fabricating non sense against the apostle Paul? Do you not realize you'll face God with your claims one day?
 
The Rogue Tomato said:
T-Bone said:
FSSL said:
The Rogue Tomato said:
This time infinity.  People like FSSL, ALAYMAN, T-Bone, etc., shout with pride how they adhere to scriptural authority while picking and re-interpreting scriptures to fit their personal outlook on how things should be.  They give lip service to the authority of scripture in order to support their self-righteous pride, but scripture isn't their final authority at all.  The worst part of it all is that the way they interpret Paul contradicts the clear words of Christ, and somehow they think that's okay.

Wait a minute. Not one of us EVER says that Paul was lying about being an apostle. THAT is not a hermeneutical problem. That is a rejection of Paul's words altogether.

Hyperbole and false claims allows him to make his point...its okay, he does it to Paul, that's pretty good company.

1 Cor 15:9 For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.

Gotta agree with Paul on this point.  And so should you agree, who claim Paul's words are the very words of God.

Of course I agree with Paul...he says he doesn't deserve it...none of us deserve anything.  Are you a Christian?  You don't deserve it...doesn't mean you are not one.
 
T-Bone said:
The Rogue Tomato said:
T-Bone said:
FSSL said:
The Rogue Tomato said:
This time infinity.  People like FSSL, ALAYMAN, T-Bone, etc., shout with pride how they adhere to scriptural authority while picking and re-interpreting scriptures to fit their personal outlook on how things should be.  They give lip service to the authority of scripture in order to support their self-righteous pride, but scripture isn't their final authority at all.  The worst part of it all is that the way they interpret Paul contradicts the clear words of Christ, and somehow they think that's okay.

Wait a minute. Not one of us EVER says that Paul was lying about being an apostle. THAT is not a hermeneutical problem. That is a rejection of Paul's words altogether.

Hyperbole and false claims allows him to make his point...its okay, he does it to Paul, that's pretty good company.

1 Cor 15:9 For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.

Gotta agree with Paul on this point.  And so should you agree, who claim Paul's words are the very words of God.

Of course I agree with Paul...he says he doesn't deserve it...none of us deserve anything.  Are you a Christian?  You don't deserve it...doesn't mean you are not one.

Except he's comparing himself to the rest of the apostles, who he obviously believes deserve to be called apostles. 

 
The Rogue Tomato said:
T-Bone said:
The Rogue Tomato said:
T-Bone said:
FSSL said:
The Rogue Tomato said:
This time infinity.  People like FSSL, ALAYMAN, T-Bone, etc., shout with pride how they adhere to scriptural authority while picking and re-interpreting scriptures to fit their personal outlook on how things should be.  They give lip service to the authority of scripture in order to support their self-righteous pride, but scripture isn't their final authority at all.  The worst part of it all is that the way they interpret Paul contradicts the clear words of Christ, and somehow they think that's okay.

Wait a minute. Not one of us EVER says that Paul was lying about being an apostle. THAT is not a hermeneutical problem. That is a rejection of Paul's words altogether.

Hyperbole and false claims allows him to make his point...its okay, he does it to Paul, that's pretty good company.

1 Cor 15:9 For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.

Gotta agree with Paul on this point.  And so should you agree, who claim Paul's words are the very words of God.

Of course I agree with Paul...he says he doesn't deserve it...none of us deserve anything.  Are you a Christian?  You don't deserve it...doesn't mean you are not one.

Except he's comparing himself to the rest of the apostles, who he obviously believes deserve to be called apostles.

Well.... you got to give it to him..... he sticks with whatever he says....

Paul also said this...

But by the grace of God I am what I am: and his grace which was bestowed upon me was not in vain; but I laboured more abundantly than they all: yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me.

Is this true?

Why do you mention one without the other?
 
The Rogue Tomato said:
T-Bone said:
The Rogue Tomato said:
T-Bone said:
FSSL said:
The Rogue Tomato said:
This time infinity.  People like FSSL, ALAYMAN, T-Bone, etc., shout with pride how they adhere to scriptural authority while picking and re-interpreting scriptures to fit their personal outlook on how things should be.  They give lip service to the authority of scripture in order to support their self-righteous pride, but scripture isn't their final authority at all.  The worst part of it all is that the way they interpret Paul contradicts the clear words of Christ, and somehow they think that's okay.

Wait a minute. Not one of us EVER says that Paul was lying about being an apostle. THAT is not a hermeneutical problem. That is a rejection of Paul's words altogether.

Hyperbole and false claims allows him to make his point...its okay, he does it to Paul, that's pretty good company.

1 Cor 15:9 For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.

Gotta agree with Paul on this point.  And so should you agree, who claim Paul's words are the very words of God.

Of course I agree with Paul...he says he doesn't deserve it...none of us deserve anything.  Are you a Christian?  You don't deserve it...doesn't mean you are not one.

Except he's comparing himself to the rest of the apostles, who he obviously believes deserve to be called apostles.

Your explanation changes nothing in what I said...Paul  calls himself elsewhere an apostle,  he doesn't need your validation to make it so...he is speaking of not deserving...again you are who you are in Christ, not because you deserve it, no matter how many others are also Christians.
 
The Rogue Tomato said:
1 Cor 15:9 For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.

Gotta agree with Paul on this point.  And so should you agree, who claim Paul's words are the very words of God.

I also agree with Peter who claims Pauls' words are the very words of God.
 
FSSL said:
The Rogue Tomato said:
1 Cor 15:9 For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God.

Gotta agree with Paul on this point.  And so should you agree, who claim Paul's words are the very words of God.

I also agree with Peter who claims Pauls' words are the very words of God.

Except since 2 Peter was most certainly not written by Peter, you are actually agreeing with someone possibly named Fred.  So it should actually be the epistle of the apostle Fred.  Paul established that you can be an apostle simply by calling yourself an apostle, so I'm assuming Fred called himself an apostle, hence my use of the label "apostle Fred". 

 
Apparently you reject 2 Peter as Scripture as well... How many books are in your canon?
 
None of us really care what people say about "pastors" "church" and the likes when they are being challenged by those who reject most of the NT, anyways.
 
FSSL said:
None of us really care what people say about "pastors" "church" and the likes when they are being challenged by those who reject most of the NT, anyways.

So, you don't care what Jesus says, because zombie Paul disagrees.  Got it. 
 
No. I don't care what you say about the NT, any longer. I am saddened by this, but it has become clear that your issue really isn't about the "brother" issue. You reject Scripture.
 
Paul was miraculously and radically changed by Jesus and called by Him to be an apostle... Here we have a forum poster 2000 years later making wild claims about the man Jesus gifted.

So... when you reject Jesus' calling of Paul, you undermine Jesus' own teaching.
 
Back
Top