Had a ton of YouTube shorts book-marked.
Wrapping the O's
- Thread starter Ekklesian
- Start date
That's all for today. Don't want to break the spamming rule.
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2013
- Messages
- 5,295
- Reaction score
- 328
- Points
- 83
I’ve always wondered, why would the school begin construction literally that after he was shot?
Isn’t that cause for suspicion of something?
Yeah I know some people on here just wanna call me a conspiracy theorist.
Or some on here will give some kind of simple answer like…..oh that’s an easy one, cheerleading girls had a bake sale so the school needed to hurry up and do construction where Charlie Kirk died from a little boy who had absolutely no help.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 14,000
- Reaction score
- 4,016
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Have you considered alternative activities? For example, exercise, personal hygiene, and girls?
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 14,000
- Reaction score
- 4,016
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Suspicion of what? (Let me guess ... you don't know.
)The crime scene was processed and released. At which point, the school was free to use it again as they wished. They were under no obligation to maintain it as a shrine.
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2013
- Messages
- 5,295
- Reaction score
- 328
- Points
- 83
Suspicion of what? (Let me guess ... you don't know.
The crime scene was processed and released. At which point, the school was free to use it again as they wished. They were under no obligation to maintain it as a shrine.
- Kirk was shot and killed on September 10, 2025.
- Video shows construction workers at the site on Sunday, September 14. That is 4 days later.
- Reuters also documented workers installing pavers at the site on September 15, 5 days after the shooting.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 14,000
- Reaction score
- 4,016
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Proving what? Are you asserting that the crime scene investigators had not processed and released the site by that time? If so, how do you know this?
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2013
- Messages
- 5,295
- Reaction score
- 328
- Points
- 83
I don’t believe it’s that cut and dry when it comes to high power men in politics to be killed and or an assassination attempt. I know you do and that’s fine.
At this point I take you as a person who still believes the reasons they gave us to go into Iraq because George Bush said so.
I understand you believe our government when they say, we’ve conducted a full investigation and we found nothing more.
For example, when Kash Patel was on Rogans podcast he said, with the information we were given there’s nothing left to give to the people and there is no one to arrest. (Epstein)
Notice, the information we were given.
As Ive said in other threads. There’s many moving parts when we are talking politics.
So, just to take the FBI, CIA, Ted Cruz, Little Marco at there word is foolish.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 14,000
- Reaction score
- 4,016
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
In other words, asked "how do you know this," you admit you don't know this. You simply make an assumption based on your other assumptions.
You automatically distrust government figures based on your presuppositions. I neither trust nor distrust government automatically.
And I'll bet you think you're the critical thinker here.
Additionally, when I see you say "I understand," I don't automatically take that to mean you don't understand.
Although it is the null hypothesis.
And? I don't care about Joe Rogan or his podcast.
I don't notice that you gave any information.
Like the little hamster wheel in your head. Squeak squeak squeak!
And while we're dropping names at random, can we take Conrad Bain at his word?
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 14,000
- Reaction score
- 4,016
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
If you meant "I don't know that the crime scene wasn't released back to the college; in fact, I actually know nothing at all about the situation, and I was just talking out of my rear" ... that actually would have saved you a lot of unnecessary writing.