Zukerburg's fight against fake news

[qwerty]

What motivation does the CIA have to make up that the Russian government was involved in hacking? At this point I have the choice to believe you or the CIA. I will choose the CIA until proven otherwise.

Of course you would.... Wholly following a government agency without proof just because they said so... Sounds like a cult

You claim there is a big conspiracy between the government and the new media. So now Trump and the Republicans have become the government does that mean that the "collusion" is between the media, Trump and the Republicans?

It could eventually end up that way. Will just have to see if there is any proof. Proof is what one has when trying to substantiate a claim.

Not sure what your beef is with Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act. It is bipartisan and it has nothing to do with Snopes or Facebook.

Weird that they would have to tuck it within another bill that would assure passage and with no scrutiny from the media. If it is supposedly the bipartisan second coming, I would think they would have made more of it.

While on the subject you act as if only Snopes is part of the Facebook plan to check news. They are one of multiple checkers.

The members of the International Fact Checking Network are all upstanding groups that adhere to a strict code of ethics. One of their major funders is the Open Society Foundation (Soros), and is openly partnered with the Tides Foundation which "is a donor advised fund that directs money to politically liberal causes."

Looks like they will be objective....



[emoji16]

No one is "wholly following" a government agency. You made that up so somehow you could link it to a cult. Nice try.

Did you link to the evidence to substantiate their claim the Russians did it and I just missed it or are you still going with the "because they said so"?

So far all I have seen is the attacking of the agencies without examples where they have not accurately fact checked. Don't waste your time pulling some super conservative publication as "fact" they are lying.

Did you link to the evidence to substantiate their claim the Russians did it and I just missed it or are you still going with the "because they said so"?

Surely some liberal website or newspaper has provided you instructions to support the claim the Russians did it... Or has it changed back to the media did it all ready....or was it Comey first, then the media...I forget.  And somewhere wikileaks gets the blame too.

Because I choose to believe the CIA over you until the CIA is proven wrong does not make it cult like. You haven't chosen not to believe because it doesn't fit your love affair with Trump.

Anyone that questions the establishment is a Trump lover.... Liberal talking point#4

Actually, not a big fan, but the lesser of two evils. Check your "fact sheet" and try another.

There is nothing wrong with questioning the establishment. Having logic in doing it rather than assuming a conspiracy will help you understand issues in a more sensible light.

Anyone who questions the norm is a conspiracy theorist. To a liberal it is unfathomable to think independently. Kudos to you for towing the line.

Could you list your liberal talking points or are you just making stuff up as you go along 8). I have never seen them.

They were passing them out at the democratic national convention..... If those white sheets have pockets, it may be in there.

Questioning the norm and buying into conspiracy theories really are two different things. In reality a conservative or a liberal can buy into an agenda without thinking it through. Both sides have reasons while they think the way they do.

Not sure your white sheet comment made sense but I take it you can not come up with your so called numbered talking points.

Question the establishment and again... Conspiracy theorist!

Keep toeing the line. Some day you will be able to keep your own server in the bathroom.