They may be "Valid" but were they right?
Matthew 5:28; But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
His actions weren’t valid, but I have no idea about his feelings. Perhaps to first answer your question, we need to separate feelings from emotions and moods.
online.uwa.edu
But It continues by stating not to let the sun go down while angry. It’s not saying, literally, not to be angry, but rather not to harbor that anger.
Verse 15 [After violating Tamar] Then Amnon hated Tamar with such intensity that his hatred was greater than the love he previously had. “Get up!” he said to her. “Be gone!”
many psychologists?....... what psychologist have you counselled with that told you that?.....
Glad you chimed in. I don’t think it would be proper to name a specific psychologist or counselor, nor would I ever ask the name of yours, but yes, I’ve heard this in person. Moreover, it’s widely available at the click of a mouse, even from more well known publications such as Psychology Today: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...r-feelings-are-valid-because-we-feel-them?amp
Are we conflating feelings with emotions and moods? (See post to ABC above).
I’m a little confused by your correlation here between the contexts of the word today versus yesteryear. Word meanings change over time. If I walk up to a big biker at a bar and tell him he looks gay today, he won’t assume I mean he looks like he’s in a happy mood.
don;t try playing your barrack room lawyer games with me..... you completely ignored parts of my post where i already adressed the questions you bring up in this one...... . and speak for yourself.... you might be conflating all kinds of things in your pontifications here.. but i haven;t conflated or confused anything..... it;s the people who have thrown too many things under one banner word of "feelings" that have done that...... ..
No intentions of playing games. I must be missing your answers. I cannot accept anecdotal evidence from your sister as evidence, although I don’t doubt your veracity.
I think this is the root of our problem. You’re applying the word from a linguistic perspective, while I’m referring to it as an innate experience.
I figured it was a lose-lose situation regardless of whom I quoted, but I knew Psychology Today has a recognizable name, rather than quoting nameless psychologists from a garden variety of blogs.
I didn’t see any profanity. Feel free to correct me. I guess I touched a nerve with the Trump speech….
I agree. We all might have certain thoughts, but acting on those thoughts is the difference between sane and insane, sinning and not sinning, etc.
what you did with the trump speech was a cheap shot .... an attempt to deflect criticism of the way you parroted main stream medias yellow spin on what trump actually said without even watching the actual speech yourself.. .you brushed it off by pointing to the red herring of a few bad words in his speech after i posted it.......... ..
.... the irony of that comment in light of how you have blindly defended what you are loyal to yourself here was almost too much to resist replying to.... ... but i managed to resist anyway because at that point i was fed up with both the conversation and your dishonest methods of discourse.... ..... knowing now that this is your style... and that you will most likely just do it again. - leaves me with no alternate but to ignore this and all other controversial topics in threads you use for bait to serve your purposes.... 
Aleshanee - my Trump comment (two or three weeks ago!) was meant as a poor reflection of the language used by a U.S. president. You chose to personalize it and make it about yourself, which wasn’t the intent.
I never knew we were arguing. I thought we were having a conversation.
There’s a reason I waited a year or two to mention my education. Case in point. In retrospect, I should have said I went to plumbing trade school.
You too, but sincerely.
…