You’re correct. Now more importantly, exactly who is going to initiate this civil litigation concerning this libelous comment?It's not slander, it's libel (i.e. published) and he can be sued for it.
His estate?You’re correct. Now more importantly, exactly who is going to initiate this civil litigation concerning this libelous comment?
The dead cannot be defamed. If there was a pending lawsuit at the time of death, the estate might be able to carry this litigation out, but no, it ain’t happening otherwise. Regardless, CK would have had a very difficult time winning this case even alive because he’s a public figure, which makes it far more difficult to win, particularly in his line of work. The burden of proof is much higher with celebrities.His estate?
No he can't. You can't defame the dead. Kirk's estate has no standing to bring suit.It's not slander, it's libel (i.e. published) and he can be sued for it.
Very true. I walked past a TV a couple weeks ago that had a newscast on. They were talking about how the Democratic leaders were discussing the need to change the language they used to sway voters. God forbid that they would change actual policies! In their minds, they just have to change the way they spin things.Lefty Loonies may be dumb but they are not stupid! They will pay attention to the public sentiment and will calibrate their rhetoric accordingly.
I don’t think any historical books would ever be published if living relatives could sue on behalf of a deceased relative.No he can't. You can't defame the dead. Kirk's estate has no standing to bring suit.
Yep.......They were talking about how the Democratic leaders were discussing the need to change the language they used to sway voters. God forbid that they would change actual policies! In their minds, they just have to change the way they spin things.