People Will Overlook

Justin Amash
And this is exactly my point. One.

Would you agree that if any politician takes money from any lobbyists group, super pac, personal large donations that they will naturally lean to push their agenda and pass laws that these people push for?
 
Ok I believe I’m beginning to understand you and others better. Correct me if I’m wrong.

Something like Epstein and the way he died. The FBI told us that he committed suicide and because of this that is what their documentation reveals.

Therefore, we have the truth?
What?


Are you implying Epstein was deliberately killed because “the government” wanted him dead so he couldn’t reveal who it was “in the government” that was involved with his sex ring?
 
What?


Are you implying Epstein was deliberately killed because “the government” wanted him dead so he couldn’t reveal who it was “in the government” that was involved with his sex ring?
No I’m asking, since the FBI said their investigation said he committed suicide that’s what you believe? In other words, whatever government department does an investigation into whatever they are investigating whatever it yields you believe it?

If so, like I said, I’m understanding the thought process.

For example, the Covid shot. The government said, they believed we needed the shot and because the government said by their investigation you took the shot?

The government told us, it was a pandemic by their highly qualified scientists and as far as I know they have documentation to prove this by their investigation.

If this is your thought process? That’s fine.

I’m asking for future conversations and how to approach it.

Another example, when they shut schools down because of their investigation it was warranted, correct?
 
Last edited:
No I’m asking, since the FBI said their investigation said he committed suicide that’s what you believe? In other words, whatever government department does an investigation into whatever they are investigating whatever it yields you believe it?
No, the type of thinking (and argument) you’re referring to with that question is called an “appeal to authority” and is fallacious. Keeping it short, I am a “trust but verify” sorta guy.
 
Back
Top