What a joke of an "administrator".
Christ is insulted by you.
Is the TR Equal to the Autographs?
- Thread starter Ekklesian
- Start date
Christ is insulted by you.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2019
- Messages
- 1,521
- Reaction score
- 676
- Points
- 113
Do we have the "originals" for the AV1611? Where are they? Without the AV1611 original manuscripts, you have nothing with which to verify your claim.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 13,688
- Reaction score
- 3,811
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
The above rebuttal, free of supporting evidence, brought to you by the intellectual bright lights of KJV-onlyism.
So why include the LXX at all in your argument? You try to support your conclusion that translations can be inerrant by making an appeal to Jesus reading from the LXX proving translations can be inerrant. If you don't believe the LXX is real or authentic, then don't make a case using it.
And then you double down.The above rebuttal, free of supporting evidence, brought to you by the intellectual bright lights of KJV-onlyism.
What a maroon.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 13,688
- Reaction score
- 3,811
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
The above was brought to you by the geniuses at KJV-only, Inc., where they don't have evidence in favour of their assertions, but at least they have whining.
How do you know? Did Jesus read from it?
Triple.The above was brought to you by the geniuses at KJV-only, Inc., where they don't have evidence in favour of their assertions, but at least they have whining.
What's the matter with you?
Are you SURE you are saved?
Yep.
Correction my friend.
It appears that you are still misreading my original AND my follow-up comments.
I did not appeal to the LXX nor did I use it to support my claim.
Translations ARE inerrant and there is plenty of Scripture to support that claim.
Eli Eli lamach sabach tani
You were absent from Apologetics class. You have not one scriptural proof that the AV 1611 is inspired. While I have is the direct evidence of 2 Tim 3:16 that the orginal Scriptures aka Autographs, are inspired and inerrant. And logic shows us that if we have a faithful representation of those Autographs, in the Overwhelming Manuscript evidence, that we de facto have the Originals. And faithful translations from those Collated texts, in the NA27 and UBS4, are in fact inerrant as well.You must have been absent for logic class.
You have no logical method for making that claim since you do not have these "originals" to verify your claim.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 13,688
- Reaction score
- 3,811
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
The above insinuations, that I am mentally and spiritually deficient, are presented without evidence, courtesy of KJV-onlyism.
That's quadruple. Hope that helps.
I have found that trying to argue woth the KJVOnly crowd is a waste of my time. I spent 7 or 8 years studying translations, Greek Manuscripts, Koine Greek and I have come to the conclusion that God has been really gracious to us to give us such an overwhelming abundance of manuscripts that it is embarrassing when KJVO'ers say that the AV1611 is inspired, or the only reliable translation.
No you don't.
That passage says NOTHING about your mythical "originals". All it says is "ALL scripture is given by inspiration....". Paul certainly was not talking about autographs since HE never saw them either.
Besides, the Critical Text is based upon proven frauds: Aleph, B, LXX.
It wasn't God who created the current confusion. It started with charlatans like Tischendorf, Westcot, Hort, Nestle, Alund and a multitude of popes.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 13,688
- Reaction score
- 3,811
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
The above assertion, again presented without supporting evidence, is the best "argument" KJV-onlyism has to offer.
That's quintuple.
For the KJV-onlyists reading this, quintuple means five (5). Five is this many:
The translation is given in the scripture. That is not the same as the entirety of the manuscripts being translated into other languages after the originals were written.
It's always something with you guys.
Everytime you post you provide ample evidence of your spiritual deficiency.The above insinuations, that I am mentally and spiritually deficient, are presented without evidence, courtesy of KJV-onlyism.
That's quadruple. Hope that helps.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 13,688
- Reaction score
- 3,811
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
You can always tell a card-carrying member of the KJV cult. It takes them about five seconds to question your "spiritual deficiency" for the mortal sin of questioning their evidence-free assertions rather than just taking their word for it.
Credulity is Christ-likeness, right?
Can't wait for you to start questioning my sexuality, while you're at it.
Sextupling down: