Is the TR Equal to the Autographs?

[JimKnox]

The above evidence-free assertion brought to you by none other than KJV-onlyism.

For all the phony blather about "final authority," it's clear that the KJVers consider themselves their own final authority, which is why this knox-knox joke expects us to just take his word for it always.

What a joke of an "administrator".
Christ is insulted by you.

 

[illinoisguy]

You have no logical method for making that claim since you do not have these "originals" to verify your claim.

Do we have the "originals" for the AV1611? Where are they? Without the AV1611 original manuscripts, you have nothing with which to verify your claim.

 

[Ransom]

What a joke of an "administrator".
Christ is insulted by you.

The above rebuttal, free of supporting evidence, brought to you by the intellectual bright lights of KJV-onlyism.

 

[voicecrying]

I only mention the LXX ( which is a fraud BTW) only for the benefit of my opponents. I have never believed LXX to be inerrant nor authentic.
Please note I said, "Some say..."

So why include the LXX at all in your argument? You try to support your conclusion that translations can be inerrant by making an appeal to Jesus reading from the LXX proving translations can be inerrant. If you don't believe the LXX is real or authentic, then don't make a case using it.

 

[JimKnox]

And t

The above rebuttal, free of supporting evidence, brought to you by the intellectual bright lights of KJV-onlyism.

And then you double down.
What a maroon.

 

[Ransom]

And then you double down.
What a maroon.

The above was brought to you by the geniuses at KJV-only, Inc., where they don't have evidence in favour of their assertions, but at least they have whining.