Search results

This came up on my news feed. The poster says that it would be a war crime if he followed through. I'm not up on the rules of warfare. What say you?

Watch your language.

Justin Amash. I like him.

States and municipalities sue the federal government all the time over these types of issues claiming federal overreach. Is the federal government unable to sue the states to comply when they are out of bounds? Take it to court and let the process work.

My goodness you are old. 😳

The history of our Iranian problem goes back well before 1979. To stop there is to ignore our part in creating the mess.

So now the president's morality matters to you. 🤔 😉

•

And that's how it is supposed to work. Bring on the amendment process. In the meantime, Washington doesn't have the authority to regulate the election process in the several states.

My family loves my dad jokes. I'm a punny guy.

Cool. I'll have an opportunity to help with making biblical applications to life choices. 😉

We are called to live a principled life. Based on policies, not that I have ever seen.

I understand your point but marriage abortion etc are not mentioned in the constitution while elections are. The election dates and terms of office are federal issues but the methodology of the voting is left to the states.

The opposite of irony is wrinkly.

Well, I don't think we have to worry about him coming out.

I'm here for you. 😉

I think he's dead.

Principles over policies is a good place to start.

🤔

What are your thoughts on the Federal Government regulating state election procedures which is charged to the responsibilities of the states?