'America First' Means 'After Israel'

Ekklesian said:
Semite:

Semite, obsolete term, popularized in the 19th century, that originally described a member of any people who speak one of the Semitic languages, a family of languages that includes Arabic, Hebrew, Amharic, Aramaic, and Tigrinya, among others. The term was later used in an ethnic sense, even though there has never been a shared Semitic identity among Semitic-speaking peoples. When used in that sense, Semite often referred specifically to people of Jewish origin, regardless of what language they spoke, a reflection of the antisemitism that was concurrent in 19th-century Europe.​
​
Because, comparatively, there weren't a whole heckuvalot of Arabs trapsing about Germany and Saxony at the time.

​
Anti-semitism
The term antisemitism was coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm Marr to designate the anti-Jewish campaigns underway in central Europe at that time.​
​
Which we know were just irrational and baseless. Because of the immaculate conception of every rabbi, no guile could ever issue from any of their lips, and they were all so well-behaved.

Martin Luther was LIAR!
​
​
​
Click to expand...

Once again you just reek vitriol when referencing anything as to Jews.
You just can’t help yourself.
 
Tarheel Baptist said:
Once again you just reek vitriol when referencing anything as to Jews.
You just can’t help yourself.
Click to expand...
No, what you're interpreting as vitriol is a mocking of the myopic and irrational view...one that you evidently hold...that the Jews have never been trouble-makers anywhere they've settled.

I call it The Fiddler on the Roof Syndrome.

Your reactions are visceral, not rational.
 
Iran drew "first blood" with their missile strikes while Israel was engaging Hamas. You think they were just going to let that go, I have some tropical beachfront property overlooking Prudhoe Bay that you might just be interested in.
 
Ekklesian said:
that the Jews have never been trouble-makers anywhere they've settled.
Click to expand...
I think you’ve probably just crossed the line from “leaning antisemitic.” I’d call this not kosher (my advanced apologies for the pun).
 
DrHuk&Duck said:
I think you’ve probably just crossed the line from “leaning antisemitic.” I’d call this not kosher (my advanced apologies for the pun).
Click to expand...
What's antisemitic about that post? He may or may not "lean" but that might be his most innocuous post of the thread.
 
Ekklesian said:
...that the Jews have never been trouble-makers anywhere they've settled.
Click to expand...
You make a good point. The Jews were troublemakers throughout the Old Testament. Babylon was a punishment, not a reward. God Himself called them whores. Does that make Him antisemitic?
 
DrHuk&Duck said:
I think you’ve probably just crossed the line from “leaning antisemitic.” I’d call this not kosher (my advanced apologies for the pun).
Click to expand...
Oh. NOW I've crossed a line?

Where were you here? And the posts following?

I'm not saying anything new.
 
Here's the long and the short of it.

This Israel...

1750381832660.png

...is not this Israel.
1750382313843.png

Neither are these Jews...
1750382478786.png


...these Jews.

1750382649363.png
 
Ekklesian said:
Oh. NOW I've crossed a line?

Where were you here? And the posts following?

I'm not saying anything new.
Click to expand...
That’s how it struck me. Maybe you should clarify when you’re speaking in a historical vs modern context.
 
DrHuk&Duck said:
That’s your read.
Click to expand...
I suppose it would help if someone would define antisemitism.

If being critical of Israel and its actions and policies is antisemitic. And the current state of Israel is the same Israel as that of the Bible. Then God was/is antisemitic.
 
subllibrm said:
I suppose it would help if someone would define antisemitism.

If being critical of Israel and its actions and policies is antisemitic. And the current state of Israel is the same Israel as that of the Bible. Then God was/is antisemitic.
Click to expand...
I’m not doing that. It’s been done ad nauseum. I believe several people on the forum even posted dictionary definitions.
 
DrHuk&Duck said:
I’m not doing that. It’s been done ad nauseum. I believe several people on the forum even posted dictionary definitions.
Click to expand...
Regardless, the accusations of antisemitism have about the same weight as calling someone who believes homosexuality is wrong homophobic. Essentially there seems to be a notion that Israel is absolved from any criticism and only an antisemite would cross that line. Not unlike someone who dares question or criticize Mr. Trump is obviously anti American and suffering from TDS.
 
subllibrm said:
Regardless, the accusations of antisemitism have about the same weight as calling someone who believes homosexuality is wrong homophobic. Essentially there seems to be a notion that Israel is absolved from any criticism and only an antisemite would cross that line. Not unlike someone who dares question or criticize Mr. Trump is obviously anti American and suffering from TDS.
Click to expand...
You’re a real peach 🍑
 
Thanks!

BTW despite our semi agreement on the question of modern Israel, ek hates my opinion of Mr. Trump. So before you go lumping us together.
 
subllibrm said:
Thanks!

BTW despite our semi agreement on the question of modern Israel, ek hates my opinion of Mr. Trump. So before you go lumping us together.
Click to expand...
I don’t care about people agreeing or disagreeing with geopolitics and Israel. Everyone is rightly entitled to their opinions. I just don’t want to feel like I’m logging into the Stormfront Forum every time I log into the Fundamental Forums.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top