My dear aleshanee,
I think you read emotions into my post that simply aren't there. I care very deeply for those who suffer with schizophrenia. My mother had the illness. She was loved, but the schizophrenia was not. I am so glad that you are doing well and that you post on the forum. On top of it all, you work with the homeless and help others.
Based on my personal experience, there are many people who have schizophrenia who refuse treatment. They tend to think the rest of the world is the problem, and it can become a downward spiral.
Below is a link to a talk by DJ Jaffe. It's short and to the point.
You wrote about Dr. Torrey, "he has not only
not kept up with that new research i mentioned but also still advocates for forcible and mandatory commitment of people with schizophrenia to mental institutions"
I have followed Dr. Torrey through the years. His own sister had schizophrenia.
He is part of an organization called Treatment Advocacy Center.
https://www.treatmentadvocacycenter.org/about-us
His work speaks for itself. Below are some quotes regarding the needs of some of the mentally ill and communities. It is a complex topic, and I won't continue the conversation after this. I admire you, aleshanee, I know you are a frequent poster, and you feel passionate about many things.
For me, every time there is a mass shooting, I think about the fact that many people absolutely refuse the treatment they need. Below are some quotes from the Treatment Advocacy website.
In 2016,
nearly 400,000 inmates in US jails and prisons were estimated to have a mental health condition. Of those inmates, an estimated 90,000 were defendants who had been arrested and jailed but had not come to trial because they were too disordered to understand the charges on which they were detained. All but three states authorize evaluating the mental competency of such offenders within the jails or in the community, and some states authorize treatment to restore competency outside a hospital.
Below are the goals and objectives.
1. identify individuals within the service area who appear to be persistently non-adherent with needed treatment for their mental illness and meet criteria for AOT under state law; 2. ensure that whenever such individuals are identified, the mental health system itself takes the initiative to gather the required evidence and apply to the court for AOT, rather than rely on community members to do so (although community members should not be impeded from initiating an AOT petition or investigation where permitted by state law); 3. safeguard the due process rights of participants at all stages of AOT proceedings; 4. maintain clear lines of communication between the court and the treatment team, such that the court receives the clinical information it needs to exercise its authority appropriately and the treatment team is able to leverage the court’s powers as needed; 5. provide evidence-based treatment services focused on engagement and helping the participant maintain stability and safety in the community; 6. continually evaluate the appropriateness of the participant’s treatment plan throughout the AOT period, and make adjustments as warranted; 7. employ specific protocols to respond in the event that an AOT participant falters in maintaining treatment engagement; 8. evaluate each AOT participant at the end of the commitment period to determine whether it is appropriate to seek renewal of the commitment or allow the participant to transition to voluntary care;
9. ensure that upon transitioning out of the program, each participant remains connected to the treatment services they continue to need to maintain stability and safety.
I am getting older and don't have as much life ahead of me as you do, so I blog on this topic at
https://wordpress.com/home/runningtowardhappy.wordpress.com. I don't have the answers, but I do have a voice.